![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Todd Pattist wrote: But this does not follow. 91.126 says you have to turn left when "approaching to land," not when you're in the traffic pattern. And, once again, the traffic pattern IS the approach at a non-towered field. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote:
91.126 says you have to turn left when "approaching to land," not when you're in the traffic pattern. And, once again, the traffic pattern IS the approach at a non-towered field. The traffic pattern may be "the approach," but,a gain, that's not the language in the FAR. It's hard to say that you're not "approaching to land" when you're less than a mile away, your aircraft is headed directly at the runway center, and you're following a prescribed track over the ground that should only be followed by those intending to land. I just find it very hard to conclude that airplanes entering the 45 leg are not "approaching to land," while those who've turned parallel to the runway on downwind are. I just don't see any good distinction. Usually, you're supposed to use the plain words of the FAR, and give those words their most common meaning, when interpreting the FAR. Would you argue the same thing if the FAA did not recommend the 45? Would you make the same distinction if these words were used in some other FAR? The only way out of the plain words that I see is for us or the Chief Counsel to "interpret" the words to mean something other than their ordinary meaning. I suspect that's what the Chief Counsel would do if forced. I've got no problem with that, and I certainly don't think this interesting curiosity should prevent anyone from flying the 45. However, to date, I'm not aware of any interpretation from the Chief Counsel on this issue. Until there is, there's always the chance that he'd adopt the plain meaning interpretation. I suspect that the hot place would freeze over long before anyone would be violated for flying the 45. Todd Pattist (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) ___ Make a commitment to learn something from every flight. Share what you learn. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() To me, "approaching to land" means a plane on final. Otherwise you're approaching to get into the pattern, not to land. all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... To me, "approaching to land" means a plane on final. Otherwise you're approaching to get into the pattern, not to land. You fly around the pattern without intending to land? Pretty wierd. all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I highly recommend Forte Agent as a newsreader. It handles newsgroup messages far better than any "included" newsreader such as those bundled with Internet Explorer, Outlook, Netscape, or Opera--all of which I have tried. Download the software at www.forteinc.com/agent/download.php The program includes the latest version of Agent as well as its freeware version, called Free Agent. This enables you to get the feel of the software without paying up front. However, where Agent really shines is in its ability to filter out objectional subjects or posters: Control+K and you're done! It was to get that functionality that I upgraded to the paid version a year ago, and I have never regretted it. The cost to register the software (and thereby to unlock the full-featured version on your computer) is $29. (A major revison is in the works. However, if you register the current version, the upgrade will be free.) all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... To me, "approaching to land" means a plane on final. Otherwise you're approaching to get into the pattern, not to land. I don't tend to make any turns on final (of course there are always those who call the "left final" position report after turning from "left base" but I've never understood what they were doing. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Ron Natalie posted:
"Cub Driver" wrote in message ... To me, "approaching to land" means a plane on final. Otherwise you're approaching to get into the pattern, not to land. I don't tend to make any turns on final (of course there are always those who call the "left final" position report after turning from "left base" but I've never understood what they were doing. Perhaps letting the jerk on "right final" know that they're in violation of the traffic pattern? Been there, seen that. Neil |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Perhaps letting the jerk on "right final" know that they're in violation of the traffic pattern? I suspect that the "left final" people come from right-traffic airports and are mostly trying to convince themselves that what they are doing is correct. And yes, afraid that someone else might be on the familiar right final. all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Natalie" wrote in message . .. | | "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... | | To me, "approaching to land" means a plane on final. Otherwise you're | approaching to get into the pattern, not to land. | | I don't tend to make any turns on final (of course there are always those who | call the "left final" position report after turning from "left base" but I've never | understood what they were doing. Now, suppose you are flying the ILS, doing the usual S-turns about the localizer. You are approaching to land. Do you make all your turns to the left? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver wrote:
To me, "approaching to land" means a plane on final. Otherwise you're approaching to get into the pattern, not to land. If it only applies to planes on final, then FAR 91.126 says that you can only make left hand turns on final. Of course, if you're making a turn on final, I suppose you're not really on final yet ..... Todd Pattist (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) ___ Make a commitment to learn something from every flight. Share what you learn. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Agent86's List of Misconceptions of FAA Procedures Zero for 15 Putz!!! | copertopkiller | Military Aviation | 11 | April 20th 04 02:17 AM |
Agent86's List of Misconceptions about FAA Procedures Zero for 15 Putz!!! | copertopkiller | Military Aviation | 9 | April 18th 04 06:13 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |