A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pattern Entry Procedures - FAA Guidance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 21st 04, 05:13 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Todd Pattist wrote:

But this does not follow. 91.126 says you have to turn left
when "approaching to land," not when you're in the traffic
pattern.


And, once again, the traffic pattern IS the approach at a non-towered field.

George Patterson
Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is
"Hummmmm... That's interesting...."
  #2  
Old January 21st 04, 06:46 PM
Todd Pattist
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote:

91.126 says you have to turn left
when "approaching to land," not when you're in the traffic
pattern.


And, once again, the traffic pattern IS the approach at a non-towered field.


The traffic pattern may be "the approach," but,a gain,
that's not the language in the FAR. It's hard to say that
you're not "approaching to land" when you're less than a
mile away, your aircraft is headed directly at the runway
center, and you're following a prescribed track over the
ground that should only be followed by those intending to
land.

I just find it very hard to conclude that airplanes entering
the 45 leg are not "approaching to land," while those who've
turned parallel to the runway on downwind are. I just don't
see any good distinction. Usually, you're supposed to use
the plain words of the FAR, and give those words their most
common meaning, when interpreting the FAR. Would you argue
the same thing if the FAA did not recommend the 45? Would
you make the same distinction if these words were used in
some other FAR?

The only way out of the plain words that I see is for us or
the Chief Counsel to "interpret" the words to mean something
other than their ordinary meaning. I suspect that's what
the Chief Counsel would do if forced. I've got no problem
with that, and I certainly don't think this interesting
curiosity should prevent anyone from flying the 45. However,
to date, I'm not aware of any interpretation from the Chief
Counsel on this issue. Until there is, there's always the
chance that he'd adopt the plain meaning interpretation. I
suspect that the hot place would freeze over long before
anyone would be violated for flying the 45.
Todd Pattist
(Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.)
___
Make a commitment to learn something from every flight.
Share what you learn.
  #3  
Old January 21st 04, 09:42 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


To me, "approaching to land" means a plane on final. Otherwise you're
approaching to get into the pattern, not to land.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #4  
Old January 21st 04, 09:55 PM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...

To me, "approaching to land" means a plane on final. Otherwise you're
approaching to get into the pattern, not to land.


You fly around the pattern without intending to land? Pretty wierd.


all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com



  #5  
Old January 22nd 04, 10:57 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



I highly recommend Forte Agent as a newsreader. It handles newsgroup
messages far better than any "included" newsreader such as those
bundled with Internet Explorer, Outlook, Netscape, or Opera--all of
which I have tried.

Download the software at www.forteinc.com/agent/download.php

The program includes the latest version of Agent as well as its
freeware version, called Free Agent. This enables you to get the feel
of the software without paying up front.

However, where Agent really shines is in its ability to filter out
objectional subjects or posters: Control+K and you're done! It was to
get that functionality that I upgraded to the paid version a year ago,
and I have never regretted it. The cost to register the software (and
thereby to unlock the full-featured version on your computer) is $29.

(A major revison is in the works. However, if you register the current
version, the upgrade will be free.)



all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #6  
Old January 21st 04, 10:14 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cub Driver" wrote in message ...

To me, "approaching to land" means a plane on final. Otherwise you're
approaching to get into the pattern, not to land.


I don't tend to make any turns on final (of course there are always those who
call the "left final" position report after turning from "left base" but I've never
understood what they were doing.


  #7  
Old January 21st 04, 10:32 PM
Neil Gould
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Recently, Ron Natalie posted:

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...

To me, "approaching to land" means a plane on final. Otherwise you're
approaching to get into the pattern, not to land.


I don't tend to make any turns on final (of course there are always
those who
call the "left final" position report after turning from "left base"
but I've never
understood what they were doing.

Perhaps letting the jerk on "right final" know that they're in violation
of the traffic pattern?

Been there, seen that.

Neil



  #8  
Old January 22nd 04, 11:00 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Perhaps letting the jerk on "right final" know that they're in violation
of the traffic pattern?


I suspect that the "left final" people come from right-traffic
airports and are mostly trying to convince themselves that what they
are doing is correct.

And yes, afraid that someone else might be on the familiar right
final.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #9  
Old January 21st 04, 11:26 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
. ..
|
| "Cub Driver" wrote in message
...
|
| To me, "approaching to land" means a plane on final. Otherwise you're
| approaching to get into the pattern, not to land.
|
| I don't tend to make any turns on final (of course there are always those
who
| call the "left final" position report after turning from "left base" but
I've never
| understood what they were doing.


Now, suppose you are flying the ILS, doing the usual S-turns about the
localizer. You are approaching to land. Do you make all your turns to the
left?


  #10  
Old January 22nd 04, 02:13 PM
Todd Pattist
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cub Driver wrote:


To me, "approaching to land" means a plane on final. Otherwise you're
approaching to get into the pattern, not to land.


If it only applies to planes on final, then FAR 91.126 says
that you can only make left hand turns on final. Of course,
if you're making a turn on final, I suppose you're not
really on final yet .....
Todd Pattist
(Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.)
___
Make a commitment to learn something from every flight.
Share what you learn.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Agent86's List of Misconceptions of FAA Procedures Zero for 15 Putz!!! copertopkiller Military Aviation 11 April 20th 04 02:17 AM
Agent86's List of Misconceptions about FAA Procedures Zero for 15 Putz!!! copertopkiller Military Aviation 9 April 18th 04 06:13 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.