A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Another Frustrated Student Pilot



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 23rd 04, 06:05 PM
OutofRudder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Radios: Yes!--controlled airports. There are two Class D airports in addition
to the one I fly in and out of within a 15-mile radius. I HAVE a hand-held.
Just because I have a hand-held should not mean that a new soloing pilot should
*knowingly* go up with a known intermittent radio because the people
responsible for maintenance who are aware of the intermittent radio are relying
on the fact that I have a hand-held rather than insisting on repairing the
radio (run-on sentence, but you get the gist). The other student currently
flying the airplane does not have a hand-held.

This area is *busy*. No radio in an emergency is one thing; good experience?
IMHO, having that attitude before leaving the ground about an intermittent
radio *in THIS area* would be stupid. As a CFI, do you send a new solo pilot
up, knowing the radio has failed completely and been so garbled that
controllers are annoyed and remember who you are the instant you call Ground to
taxi to the runway, with the idea that if the radio fails, they can then divert
their attention, eyes, and two hands between flying the airplane, looking for
traffic, and dialing frequencies and working their hand-held?

And yes, I realize that I am not flying at night or using the nav lights, but
they're still supposed to be operable. I felt three months was sufficient time
to either change the bulb, replace the switch, or disconnect and label them per
the regs.

I agree that any one or two issues were less significant, and we did fly the
airplane for three months with them. Coming out of the 100-hr, NONE of those
less significant issues had been resolved and there were more significant new
ones as well. One CFI said to me: "Count up how many strikes you have against
you before you leave the ground and weigh them." The sum of ALL these older
minor and new major strikes after the 100-hr tipped the scales for me. Perhaps
I was naive, but their reaction to my stand on safety was the big surprise (and
disappointment) to me!

My point in all this, again, being that students who quit or move to different
CFIs midstream aren't always acting out of fear of soloing, though that seems
to be the most convenient way for people in certain positions to pass the buck
(not referring to anyone here). Thanks for the replies.
AFSP

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots [email protected] Owning 9 April 1st 04 02:54 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM
Enlisted pilots John Randolph Naval Aviation 41 July 21st 03 02:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.