A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Great shot of the Thunderbird F-16 Ejection



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 23rd 04, 09:38 PM
Jim
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ok, somebody smarter than me tell me why they wouldn't set their altimeter's
to 0 before take off to prevent something like that.
--
Jim Burns III

Remove "nospam" to reply

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:5igQb.131182$I06.1149412@attbi_s01...
Over on "alt.binaries.pictures.aviation" someone has posted a terrific,

high
resolution, nearly head-on shot of the Air Force Thunderbird F-16 ejection
sequence from the crash in Idaho a few months ago. It REALLY shows how
close the pilot came to hitting the deck before ejecting.

It turns out the pilot didn't convert his altitude from MSL to AGL
correctly, and thus started the split-S maneuver some 800 feet too low.

For those interested in the accident report, here it is:
************************************************** ***********

Thunderbird accident report released [Updated]
Wednesday, January 21, 2004 - 09:10 PM

A pilot's error caused a Thunderbirds F-16C to crash shortly after
takeoff during a September airshow at Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho.
The pilot ejected just before the aircraft impacted the ground.

On Wednesday, the Air Force Accident Investigation Board held a news
conference at the home of the Thunderbirds - Nellis Air Force Base - to
announce what caused an F-16 to crash last September.

According to the accident investigation board report the pilot,
31-year-old Captain Chris Stricklin, misinterpreted the altitude required

to
complete the "Split S" maneuver. He made his calculation based on an
incorrect mean-sea-level altitude of the airfield. The pilot incorrectly
climbed to 1,670 feet above ground level instead of 2,500 feet before
initiating the pull down to the Split S maneuver.

When he realized something was wrong, the pilot put maximum back

stick
pressure and rolled slightly left to ensure the aircraft would impact away
from the crowd should he have to eject. He ejected when the aircraft was

140
feet above ground - just 0.8 seconds prior to impact. He sustained only
minor injuries from the ejection. There was no other damage to military or
civilian property.

The aircraft, valued at about $20.4 million, was destroyed.

The difference in altitudes at Nellis and Mountain Home may have
contributed to the pilot's error. The airfield at Nellis is at 2,000 feet
whereas the one at Mountain Home is at 3,000 feet. It appears that the

pilot
reverted back to his Nellis habit pattern for s aplit second. Thunderbird
commander Lt. Col. Richard McSpadden said Stricklin had performed the

stunt
around 200 times, at different altitudes during his year as a Thunderbird
pilot.

McSpadden says Stricklin is an exceptional officer. "He is an
extremely talented pilot. He came in here and made an honest mistake,"

says
Lt. Col. McSpadden. But that mistake has cost Stricklin his prestigious

spot
on the Thunderbird team. "He's assigned to Washington D.C.," says

McSpadden.
"He's working in the Pentagon there in one of the agencies."

The maneuver the pilot was trying to complete is called the "Split S
Maneuver." The stunt requires that the pilot climb to 2,500 feet.
Investigators say Stricklin only climbed to 1,670 feet before he went into
the spinning roll.

The board determined other factors substantially contributed to
creating the opportunity for the error including the requirement to

convert
sea level altitude information from the F-16 instruments - to their

altitude
above ground and call out that information to a safety operator below.

But the Air Force has now changed that as a result of the crash.
Thunderbird pilots will now call out the MSL (mean-sea-level) altitudes as
opposed to the AGL (above-ground-level) altitudes.

Thunderbird pilots will now also climb an extra 1000 feet before
performing the Split S Maneuver to prevent another mistake like the one on
Sep.14, 2003 from happening again.

Captain Chris Stricklin has been in the Air Force since 1994 and

flew
with the Thunderbirds since their first season. He has logged a total of
15,000+ flight hours and has received numerous awards. He served as a

flight
examiner, flight instructor and flight commander.

The Thunderbirds will again take to the skies this year. They have

65
air shows scheduled.

The September crash was the second involving a Thunderbirds jet

since
the team began using F-16s in 1983.

Pilot error was blamed for a Feb. 14, 1994, training crash involving
in a maneuver called a spiral descent at the Indian Springs Auxiliary
Airfield, northwest of Las Vegas. The pilot survived, but the maneuver was
discontinued.

The worst crash in Thunderbird history, dubbed the "Diamond Crash,"
came when four pilots crashed Jan. 18, 1982, during training at Indian
Springs. A malfunction in the lead plane was blamed.
************************************************** ***********
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"




  #2  
Old January 23rd 04, 10:12 PM
David Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Ok, somebody smarter than me tell me why they wouldn't set their

altimeter's
to 0 before take off to prevent something like that.


Because KMUO is at 2996 feet, and Air Force planes' altimeters won't go down
to 26.92? Much the same reason that we don't have the convenience of setting
QFE around an airport, which is routine in flat old England.

-- David Brooks


  #3  
Old January 23rd 04, 10:11 PM
Robert Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim" wrote

Ok, somebody smarter than me tell me why they wouldn't set their
altimeter's to 0 before take off to prevent something like that.


I'm with you....that way every show would be exactly the same.

Bob Moore

  #4  
Old January 24th 04, 12:01 AM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default





"Jim" wrote


Ok, somebody smarter than me tell me why they wouldn't set their
altimeter's to 0 before take off to prevent something like that.


Because you can't.

  #5  
Old January 24th 04, 12:22 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

because the MSL altitude of the ground is to high above sea level and it
can't be turned down that far to "zero"..

we have the same problem with flat land sail plane pilots.. if I set my
local altimeter to zero.. which I can't because it's to far to go.. beyond
the adjustment range of the altimeter.. then how do I know I'm high enough
to clear the local mountains.. or if my landing airport is still 2500ft
above the airport I take off from.. I have to do the mental math calculation
to know my AGL altitude.


BT

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Ok, somebody smarter than me tell me why they wouldn't set their

altimeter's
to 0 before take off to prevent something like that.
--
Jim Burns III

Remove "nospam" to reply

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:5igQb.131182$I06.1149412@attbi_s01...
Over on "alt.binaries.pictures.aviation" someone has posted a terrific,

high
resolution, nearly head-on shot of the Air Force Thunderbird F-16

ejection
sequence from the crash in Idaho a few months ago. It REALLY shows how
close the pilot came to hitting the deck before ejecting.

It turns out the pilot didn't convert his altitude from MSL to AGL
correctly, and thus started the split-S maneuver some 800 feet too low.

For those interested in the accident report, here it is:
************************************************** ***********

Thunderbird accident report released [Updated]
Wednesday, January 21, 2004 - 09:10 PM

A pilot's error caused a Thunderbirds F-16C to crash shortly after
takeoff during a September airshow at Mountain Home Air Force Base,

Idaho.
The pilot ejected just before the aircraft impacted the ground.

On Wednesday, the Air Force Accident Investigation Board held a

news
conference at the home of the Thunderbirds - Nellis Air Force Base - to
announce what caused an F-16 to crash last September.

According to the accident investigation board report the pilot,
31-year-old Captain Chris Stricklin, misinterpreted the altitude

required
to
complete the "Split S" maneuver. He made his calculation based on an
incorrect mean-sea-level altitude of the airfield. The pilot incorrectly
climbed to 1,670 feet above ground level instead of 2,500 feet before
initiating the pull down to the Split S maneuver.

When he realized something was wrong, the pilot put maximum back

stick
pressure and rolled slightly left to ensure the aircraft would impact

away
from the crowd should he have to eject. He ejected when the aircraft was

140
feet above ground - just 0.8 seconds prior to impact. He sustained only
minor injuries from the ejection. There was no other damage to military

or
civilian property.

The aircraft, valued at about $20.4 million, was destroyed.

The difference in altitudes at Nellis and Mountain Home may have
contributed to the pilot's error. The airfield at Nellis is at 2,000

feet
whereas the one at Mountain Home is at 3,000 feet. It appears that the

pilot
reverted back to his Nellis habit pattern for s aplit second.

Thunderbird
commander Lt. Col. Richard McSpadden said Stricklin had performed the

stunt
around 200 times, at different altitudes during his year as a

Thunderbird
pilot.

McSpadden says Stricklin is an exceptional officer. "He is an
extremely talented pilot. He came in here and made an honest mistake,"

says
Lt. Col. McSpadden. But that mistake has cost Stricklin his prestigious

spot
on the Thunderbird team. "He's assigned to Washington D.C.," says

McSpadden.
"He's working in the Pentagon there in one of the agencies."

The maneuver the pilot was trying to complete is called the "Split

S
Maneuver." The stunt requires that the pilot climb to 2,500 feet.
Investigators say Stricklin only climbed to 1,670 feet before he went

into
the spinning roll.

The board determined other factors substantially contributed to
creating the opportunity for the error including the requirement to

convert
sea level altitude information from the F-16 instruments - to their

altitude
above ground and call out that information to a safety operator below.

But the Air Force has now changed that as a result of the crash.
Thunderbird pilots will now call out the MSL (mean-sea-level) altitudes

as
opposed to the AGL (above-ground-level) altitudes.

Thunderbird pilots will now also climb an extra 1000 feet before
performing the Split S Maneuver to prevent another mistake like the one

on
Sep.14, 2003 from happening again.

Captain Chris Stricklin has been in the Air Force since 1994 and

flew
with the Thunderbirds since their first season. He has logged a total of
15,000+ flight hours and has received numerous awards. He served as a

flight
examiner, flight instructor and flight commander.

The Thunderbirds will again take to the skies this year. They have

65
air shows scheduled.

The September crash was the second involving a Thunderbirds jet

since
the team began using F-16s in 1983.

Pilot error was blamed for a Feb. 14, 1994, training crash

involving
in a maneuver called a spiral descent at the Indian Springs Auxiliary
Airfield, northwest of Las Vegas. The pilot survived, but the maneuver

was
discontinued.

The worst crash in Thunderbird history, dubbed the "Diamond

Crash,"
came when four pilots crashed Jan. 18, 1982, during training at Indian
Springs. A malfunction in the lead plane was blamed.
************************************************** ***********
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"






  #6  
Old January 24th 04, 06:49 AM
Dale
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article vViQb.58525$zs4.35677@fed1read01,
"BTIZ" wrote:

because the MSL altitude of the ground is to high above sea level and it
can't be turned down that far to "zero"..

we have the same problem with flat land sail plane pilots.. if I set my
local altimeter to zero.. which I can't because it's to far to go.. beyond
the adjustment range of the altimeter.. then how do I know I'm high enough
to clear the local mountains.. or if my landing airport is still 2500ft
above the airport I take off from.. I have to do the mental math calculation
to know my AGL altitude.



He's talking about doing acro over the field...not making a
cross-country.

--
Dale L. Falk

There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing around with airplanes.

http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html
  #7  
Old January 24th 04, 04:59 PM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


He's talking about doing acro over the field...not making a
cross-country.

--
Dale L. Falk


regardless.. you still can't turn the altimeter adjustment that far to get
to zero.. and if the local pilots want to fly at zero.. it sets bad habit
patterns for when they do go cross country

BT


  #8  
Old January 24th 04, 08:38 PM
Pilot Bob \(I am just a great guy!!\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:FvxQb.59482$zs4.11458@fed1read01...

He's talking about doing acro over the field...not making a
cross-country.

--
Dale L. Falk


regardless.. you still can't turn the altimeter adjustment that far to get
to zero.. and if the local pilots want to fly at zero.. it sets bad habit
patterns for when they do go cross country


Well maybe someone ought to think outside the box (or, in this case - inside
the box). It makes sense to have an adjustable altimeter for aerobatics than
can be zero'ed through at least 10,000 MSL.


  #9  
Old January 25th 04, 01:03 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Pilot Bob (I am just a great guy!!)" wrote:

It makes sense to have an adjustable altimeter for aerobatics than
can be zero'ed through at least 10,000 MSL.


And you're going to put this *where* in an F-16?

George Patterson
Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is
"Hummmmm... That's interesting...."
  #10  
Old January 25th 04, 01:26 AM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, said:
"Pilot Bob (I am just a great guy!!)" wrote:

It makes sense to have an adjustable altimeter for aerobatics than
can be zero'ed through at least 10,000 MSL.


And you're going to put this *where* in an F-16?


On an F-16, it will probably be a software patch. They don't call it the
Electric Jet for nothin.


--
Paul Tomblin
http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
Please say this was followed by a very serious discussion on Right and
Wrong involving a blow torch, 220V, a cobra and three East Germans
named Georg... -- Robert Uhl
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
16 Aug 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 17th 04 12:37 AM
Navalized P-38 Lightning? Steven Wagner Military Aviation 51 February 28th 04 10:18 PM
FS: Antique & Vintage Aircraft Gauges, etc TBBlakeley Aviation Marketplace 0 October 16th 03 01:50 PM
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future Jack White Military Aviation 71 September 21st 03 02:58 PM
How I got to Oshkosh (long) Doug Owning 2 August 18th 03 12:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.