![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() BTIZ wrote: soo... if all those people are in the air.. is the earth suddenly that much lighter?? In an airplane, air is pushed down to support the plane and it's contents, so the pressure on the Earth's surface doesn't change. I'd say that makes it "the same weight". I don't know if one can say the same about people in lighter than air craft. George Patterson Love, n.: A form of temporary insanity afflicting the young. It is curable either by marriage or by removal of the afflicted from the circumstances under which he incurred the condition. It is sometimes fatal, but more often to the physician than to the patient. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
... In an airplane, air is pushed down to support the plane and it's contents, so the pressure on the Earth's surface doesn't change. I'd say that makes it "the same weight". I don't know if one can say the same about people in lighter than air craft. Of course one can. In a lighter-than-air craft, the aircraft is still being supported by the air underneath, which transfers that load to the Earth. There are ways to nitpick the question, considering things like angular momentum and inertia -- after all, it's true that since the air doesn't provide a rigid connection, there are theoretical ways to demonstrate that the Earth's total mass *does* change -- but then in those cases, anything not firmly anchored to the planet could be considered not part of the total mass of the planet, and thus the fact that the hypothetical people are in the air is irrelevant. The Earth would have been "that much lighter" the instant they were not firmly anchored to the planet (say, on the walk across the ramp to the airplane). Pete |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Earl Grieda" wrote in message
ink.net... So, your guesstimate is that for every one person flying there is a cummaltive 10 people in a terminal watching them depart or arrive. That, to me, seems like an inflated estimate. It may be off, but I don't think it's by much. Here at SeaTac they have a billboard with "airport statistics", and I was surprised at the large factor between flying passengers and non-passengers in the airport. Non-passengers beat out the passengers by a huge margin, and it was mostly friends and family, rather than airport workers, that made up the difference. I don't know if it was 10X, but it was some large (greater than 2) factor. Not that whatever the factor is, it has anything to do with the original question. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | November 1st 03 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |