![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Bishop" wrote in message ...
Interested to hear you are doing the IMC and FAA IR. After getting my FAA licence revalidated recently at Luton, I decided to carry on with some training. I am now three hours into my night rating and then will finish the IMC I started ten years ago and move on to the FAA IR. My instructor says that I could even go for a FAA commercial licence, as I have enough hours, but I'll leave that for now, sounds like hard work. Circuit bashing at Luton is hard enough already, imagine Easyjet and Ryanair being told they are number 2 to the cherokee on base! The interesting thing I found out is that if you get the IMC and then the FAA IR, if you fly in a "G" plane, you can use the IR rating once you leave the UK FIR. If it's a "N" reg, then obviously no problem the whole time. Regards John Got the night qualification at Christmas when in the USA. I used to have the IMC which I git straight after the PPL but decided that IMC and my level of experience were not to be mixed. Now a bit older and wiser Ihope, I can make better use of both especially when going to the US. Having the night qualification releases me to fly at night there. Getting the IR will complete the set. The advantage of having the IMC rating is that I can shoot the various instrument procedures with that to satisfy the IR currency even if I dont exercise the privileges of the FAA/IR. after all the book only requires that instrument approaches are carried out, and they will be in my logbook. With the number of approaches available at airports not in controlled airspace it becomes even easier. I reckon I could do 6 different types of approaches from within an hour of where I fly from. The RAF can help out as well. With our weather, then it makes sense to practice them anyway. When I did my IMC, the let down I had to do on the flight test was a VDF/DME in real IMC at Swansea (always was IMC in Swansea as well as very windy). That was fun and required a lot of work as I remember having to continually transmit for the QDM and QDR. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your flight test was similar to my first night lesson. I was told it was to
be "an appreciation of instruments" refresher. My instructor is an IR rated 737 pilot, so we took off in iffy weather, entered cloud at 600ft and didn't see anything but the wings until we popped out of cloud at 700ft on approach! My first instrument flight for ten years and I did quite well. John "Jeb" wrote in message om... "John Bishop" wrote in message ... Interested to hear you are doing the IMC and FAA IR. After getting my FAA licence revalidated recently at Luton, I decided to carry on with some training. I am now three hours into my night rating and then will finish the IMC I started ten years ago and move on to the FAA IR. My instructor says that I could even go for a FAA commercial licence, as I have enough hours, but I'll leave that for now, sounds like hard work. Circuit bashing at Luton is hard enough already, imagine Easyjet and Ryanair being told they are number 2 to the cherokee on base! The interesting thing I found out is that if you get the IMC and then the FAA IR, if you fly in a "G" plane, you can use the IR rating once you leave the UK FIR. If it's a "N" reg, then obviously no problem the whole time. Regards John Got the night qualification at Christmas when in the USA. I used to have the IMC which I git straight after the PPL but decided that IMC and my level of experience were not to be mixed. Now a bit older and wiser Ihope, I can make better use of both especially when going to the US. Having the night qualification releases me to fly at night there. Getting the IR will complete the set. The advantage of having the IMC rating is that I can shoot the various instrument procedures with that to satisfy the IR currency even if I dont exercise the privileges of the FAA/IR. after all the book only requires that instrument approaches are carried out, and they will be in my logbook. With the number of approaches available at airports not in controlled airspace it becomes even easier. I reckon I could do 6 different types of approaches from within an hour of where I fly from. The RAF can help out as well. With our weather, then it makes sense to practice them anyway. When I did my IMC, the let down I had to do on the flight test was a VDF/DME in real IMC at Swansea (always was IMC in Swansea as well as very windy). That was fun and required a lot of work as I remember having to continually transmit for the QDM and QDR. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 02:41 AM |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
Tips on Getting Your Instrument Rating Sooner and at Lower Cost | Fred | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | October 19th 04 07:31 AM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |