![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net... Any airways at all from this VOR? Use your protractor to measure the angle between the radial defining the charted airway and the line you just drew. Or even better, just drop the plotter on top of the existing airways and line up the appropriate degree markings with the airways. Then just read the magnetic course from the drawn course line underneath the plotter. No need to measure any angles at all. This will be better than applying the local variation, since VOR radials are not kept 100% up-to-date with changes in variation. Using existing airway headings will ensure that the drawn course matches the radio indication, even if not the magnetic compass. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This week's AW&ST: apparently THAAD will have some ABM (as in anti- *ICBM*) capability. | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 29 | August 31st 04 04:20 AM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Enroute chart question.. | chris priest | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | August 10th 04 01:05 AM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |