A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OT (sort of): CBS revisited



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old February 4th 04, 05:14 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Harlow" wrote in message
news | You have to draw the line somewhere. Personally, I think there is way
| too much bare flesh as it is, for both men and women.
|
| That's fine, if the exposed human body freaks you out, then by all means
you
| should shield yourself from it. Ironically, it's the religious zealots
who
| seem to be most afraid of looking at nudes as their bible says man was
| created in his likeness - you'd think they would be the ones promoting us
to
| be in our most god-like state. Then again, what is yet another
| contradiction?

One might point out that God and Jesus Christ generally are depicted as
fully clothed, Michelangelo to the contrary. The Bible, since you brought it
up, makes a point of the fact that the very first thing that Adam and Eve
noticed after they learned the difference between right and wrong was that
they were naked. But then, what is forgetting yet another inconvenient fact
to the anti-religious zealot?


  #52  
Old February 4th 04, 05:15 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Harlow" wrote in message
news |
| The "for what" is for personal gain, as is most exemplified in the USA.
|
| Certainly most citizens don't give a rat's ass what "future generations"
| think (as in saddling them with our debt with our current drunken sailor
at
| the helm) just as we don't care what our global neighbors think.

And this is the funniest point of all -- apparently you think there is no
connection between social licentiousness and that huge debt. I beg to
differ....


  #53  
Old February 4th 04, 06:49 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Fisher" wrote in message
...
Aren't you listening? We don't watch that crap.


I see. Avoidance, eh? That's a handy tool in the pattern. Makes you a
coward in a debate, though.


You don't get it. For me, it's a non-issue simply because I would not have
been in that situation. You were foolish enough to let your kids watch all
the crap that preceded the exposed breast, in spite of the fact that every
minute before that was every bit as offensive as the exposed breast.

What difference would it have made if Janet and Justin had been naked? Even
clothed, their behavior was every bit as offensive.

Answer the question.


Your question is stupid. It's like you asked me how would I feel if, while
at a strip club with my son, two of the strippers started performing
cunnilingus on each other.

Pete


  #54  
Old February 4th 04, 06:51 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Fisher" wrote in message
...
Naw, I suspect (even without knowing whether he drives a low wing or high)
that Andrew actually has balls and would kick my ass.


I would kick your ass if you did anything worth reacting that way. But
waving your naked butt in front of anyone, even my family, just doesn't
qualify. That would have reflected poorly on you (as if the stuff you write
here doesn't already reflect poorly enough on you), but it wouldn't hurt me
or my family any.

Why would I even waste time thinking about it, never mind have somebody's
bloody pulp of a body on my stoop to clean up?

Pete


  #55  
Old February 4th 04, 10:00 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C,

Apparently, any standards of behavior above that of animals are too much for
some people.


Apart from what others have said, do you happen to know where most porn movies
in the world are produced? Yes, it's L.A.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #56  
Old February 4th 04, 10:00 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C,

But I despise the argument that porn is justified because we
have violent videos


Who's talkign about porn? Timberlake and Jackson was porn? Get a grip
on reality!

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #57  
Old February 4th 04, 01:37 PM
Dennis O'Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Take it easy CJ.... You are not the only person on this ng who has to deal
with medicaid mommas, derelict kids, teen pregnancy, drug addiction, etc.,
etc., every working day... Once you lose your objectivity you cease to be a
part of the solution...
And, this is not a disease exclusive to the USA... Much of europe has it in
varying forms.. Even lofty Canada, who delights in looking down her nose at
the USA, is developing the disease... And, I won't even begin to enumerate
the problems of the third world...
So CJ, you and the missus go back to patching the cracks and leaks in your
section of the dike and the rest of us will continue to do ours and perhaps
together we can stave off the flood a bit longer...
cheers ... denny

"C J Campbell" . Sanity is a rare commodity in these days. A sane person
knows that there are consequences to what you do. A sane person knows that
whatever people do affects everybody else.



  #58  
Old February 4th 04, 03:25 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dennis,

teen pregnancy


That, one might argue, is - among other factors - connected to how kids
are introduced to sex and how open a society deals with sex. Which
nicely brings us back to the topic.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oshkosh RAH RAP Frequencies (Final ... sort of) Jim Weir Home Built 4 July 22nd 04 03:38 PM
A D Day Reflection Revisited Dudley Henriques Naval Aviation 2 June 5th 04 05:01 AM
A D Day Reflection Revisited Dudley Henriques Military Aviation 1 June 4th 04 12:38 AM
Concorde Revisited sandpebble General Aviation 0 December 7th 03 05:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.