![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you don't get much of an "engine out" at 1500RPM
sort of builds a false sense of security of the seemingly good glide ratio BT "BoDEAN" wrote in message ... In small high wing planes (Ie 172, 152, 150) do you do/teach pulling throttle all the back to idel? I've been told bring it to 1500 RPM, 1 notch of flaps. Not as hard on the engine |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm going with BT on this one.... I know the post is about the potential for
engine damage, and I'm guessing that the people using this technique are worried about shock cooling caused by the prop driving the engine and forcing the engine to digest more cool air through it's cylinders than normal.... just a guess... but I'd be more worried about what it teaches the student. Think about it. Even at idle the engine is producing "some" power. However you want to explain it, power either produces lift or extends glide range. I'm not sure that 1 notch of flaps produces enough drag to overcome the increased lift created by the 1500 rpms + flaps configuration. Just a thought. (But I'm on so much cold medicine I might not be thinking to clearly) -- Jim Burns III Remove "nospam" to reply "BTIZ" wrote in message news:nl_Wb.15852$IF1.7345@fed1read01... you don't get much of an "engine out" at 1500RPM sort of builds a false sense of security of the seemingly good glide ratio BT |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can simulate a engine out approach by adding just enough drag to
offset the engine rpm. In the Canadian PTS, this was specifically mentioned as an acceptable practice. However, as others have pointed out there is no clear evidence to support the shock cooling theory in small aircraft. Some believe it exists, and some don't. You have to do whatever you feel is necessary to safely simulate an engine out approach. There is nothing wrong with leaving 1500 RPM and using flaps. Even if you pull the power back completely, one can argue that frequently clearing the engine unrealistically increases the glide range. The effect of power on glide performance is not all that different than the effects of wind. There are too many variables to claim that one way is better than another. It all comes down to what the pilot is comfortable with. "BTIZ" wrote in message news:nl_Wb.15852$IF1.7345@fed1read01... you don't get much of an "engine out" at 1500RPM sort of builds a false sense of security of the seemingly good glide ratio BT "BoDEAN" wrote in message ... In small high wing planes (Ie 172, 152, 150) do you do/teach pulling throttle all the back to idel? I've been told bring it to 1500 RPM, 1 notch of flaps. Not as hard on the engine |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ROP masking of engine problems | Roger Long | Owning | 4 | September 27th 04 07:36 PM |
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 06:42 PM |
What if the germans... | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 119 | January 26th 04 11:20 PM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |