![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news:uGLXb.186249$U%5.916363@attbi_s03... "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "Gary Drescher" wrote in message news:6idXb.310621$na.463020@attbi_s04... Well, suppose the pilot returns tomorrow and establishes two-way communication with the Class C controller. Yesterday's remain-clear instruction still has not been explicitly rescinded. So is it still in effect, or can the pilot now enter the Class C? What happened yesterday? Why didn't the pilot respond to the controller's calls? Who said the pilot didn't respond? ATC: "Cessna 12345, remain clear of Class C". N12345: "Roger". N12345 flies around the Class C to some destination, then returns the following day and establishes the requisite two-way communication before entering Class C. Is yesterday's "remain clear" instruction still in effect? If not, when did it expire? --Gary It doesn't matter but conceptually, the "remain clear" does not expire. The next day, the pilot will again make contact to gain entry to the class C. The pilot will say, "Cessna 1234, 8 NE, landing Big City, with information Echo." The controller will respond with "Cessna 1234, standby" - which is a clearance to enter the class C, negating any previous instructions to remain clear. Hearing no acknowledgement, or an explicit "remain clear" is a new instruction to remain clear. Whether it is a few minutes later, later the same day, the next day, whatever, there is no explicit cancelation of the "remain clear" necessary. ------------------------------- Travis |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... It doesn't matter but conceptually, the "remain clear" does not expire. The next day, the pilot will again make contact to gain entry to the class C. The pilot will say, "Cessna 1234, 8 NE, landing Big City, with information Echo." The controller will respond with "Cessna 1234, standby" - which is a clearance to enter the class C, negating any previous instructions to remain clear. You're right that he can enter Class C airspace but for the wrong reason. The instruction to remain clear was not carried forward to the next day. The controller tried to contact the aircraft again a couple of times, the pilot didn't respond, the controller watched his target proceed around the Class C airspace, so he concluded the pilot no longer wanted to enter the airspace and discarded the strip. The call the following day is a new flight unrelated to the previous. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |
Is a BFR instruction? | Roger Long | Piloting | 11 | December 11th 03 09:58 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |