|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
February 16th 04, 03:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... Not true. A "remain clear" prior to departure is no different than one in the air. After departure, if the controller of the class C airspace makes radio contact, that is clearance to enter. Wrong. I don't know who told you that but it is simply not correct. It is illogical and unsupported by any documentation. Once instructed to remain clear of Class C airspace you must remain clear until you receive an instruction that permits or requires entry. That is not my opinion, that is a fact. 
|
|
#2
February 16th 04, 04:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net... "Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... Not true. A "remain clear" prior to departure is no different than one in the air. After departure, if the controller of the class C airspace makes radio contact, that is clearance to enter. Wrong. I don't know who told you that but it is simply not correct. It is illogical and unsupported by any documentation. Once instructed to remain clear of Class C airspace you must remain clear until you receive an instruction that permits or requires entry. That is not my opinion, that is a fact. It is common practice and expected behavior. The casual appearance of clearance to enter the class C is documented in the AIM. The paricular sequence of events is not. It is no more illogical than having the controller respond with "Cessna 1234, standby" - which is explicitly documented as clearance to enter class C airspace. ------------------------------- Travis
|
|
#3
February 16th 04, 04:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... It is common practice and expected behavior. The casual appearance of clearance to enter the class C is documented in the AIM. The paricular sequence of events is not. It is no more illogical than having the controller respond with "Cessna 1234, standby" - which is explicitly documented as clearance to enter class C airspace. You're not even trying to understand this.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
| Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
| Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |
| Is a BFR instruction? | Roger Long | Piloting | 11 | December 11th 03 09:58 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Hybrid Mode
