A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Single-engine plane with the best range?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 17th 04, 08:30 PM
Dennis O'Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Your experience in the first example is due to the wing needing to fly
within a certain L/D for efficiency and your cooling drag... As your speed
goes up so does your cooling drag... As your speed goes down, the airfoil
L/D ratio deteriorates with increasing angle of attack...

A simple look at the manufacturers range curves for fast aircraft shows that
there a peak in the range plot at some point on the power curve... Since
the curve is a mountain (or valley, depending on how the ordinate and
abcissa are set up) there will be two points down from the peak, one at a
higher power setting and one at a lower power setting where the range is
exactly the same, and that is likely what happened to your high power / low
power example...

As far as fuel burn between a fast airplane and a slow one, that is apples
and oranges....

Now range for fast aircraft is strongly affected by the airfoil
characteristics... Slippery airfoils have a sharp rise in the drag as the
AOA is increased to compensate for lower airspeeds and lower lift... Fatter
airfoils have a lower rise in their drag with increasing AOA... My Apache is
a case in point... The lower the power setting the longer the range, mostly
because it's fat airfoil just loves high angles of attack...
- and because cooling drag , goes down rapidly with decreasing speed. and
vice versa -

Example at sea level:
75% = 940 miles
65% = 1040 miles
55% = 1130 miles
45% = 1220 miles

While I don't have a handbook for a Lancair IVP, or a Glasair III, I'm
willing to bet that there is a range peak with decreasing power between
roughly 68% and 63% and then it goes downhill from there because these
laminar flow wings have to fly inside the L/D bucket or the drag goes sky
high......
denny

"Stealth Pilot" wrote in message
bob my experience doesnt support that.

I fly a Wittman W8 tailwind with an O-200.

flying between Ceduna and Forrest via Nullabor Homestead is about 297
nautical miles.
I have made the flight with two settings.
-at reduced rpm (about 1800rpm) and about 70 knots. (in company with a
piper cub)
-at cruise rpm (2500 rpm) and 114 knots.
weight and aircraft trim was just about the same.

believe it or not the fuel consumed was the same.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should I consider this plane - weird engine history [email protected] Owning 12 February 3rd 05 12:18 AM
ROP masking of engine problems Roger Long Owning 4 September 27th 04 07:36 PM
Lancair Columbia 400: The World's Fastest Certified Piston Single Engine Aircraft! David Ross Aviation Marketplace 0 August 24th 04 07:13 PM
Real stats on engine failures? Captain Wubba Piloting 127 December 8th 03 04:09 PM
The "Lightweight" Fighter is on the verge of overtaking the F-105 as the heaviest single engine fighter of all time. Talk about irony. Scott Ferrin Military Aviation 1 November 24th 03 03:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.