A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Single-engine plane with the best range?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 17th 04, 09:19 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Stealth Pilot" wrote in message
...
[...] it seems to take the same amount of energy to move the aircraft the
distance. all you vary with rpm is the rate of energy conversion and
the air speed.


I don't know how you did your test, or what the specific airspeeds are for
the Tailwind, but generally speaking, Bob's statement was exactly correct.

It does not take the same amount of energy to move the aircraft a given
distance. The amount of energy depends on a variety of things, but the
biggest variable in the equation is airspeed (most other factors are
constant). The least amount of fuel will be used at the airspeed that
corresponds to maximum lift-to-drag ratio, and for most aircraft, this
airspeed is well below the normal cruising airspeed.

This is because in level cruise flight, lift is constant, so at L/Dmax, drag
as at a minimum, and drag is what the fuel you're burning is working
against. Less drag means less fuel required, even for the same distance.

I doubt that the Tailwind's L/Dmax is at or above 114 knots (though, there's
no theoretical reason it couldn't be, I guess), which means that there IS a
speed below 114 knots at which fuel consumption would have been less. Of
course, if 70 knots is below *that* speed, then what you found was the
increase in drag that occurs as you slow down further below L/Dmax.

Another possibility, of course, is that you simply forgot to lean the engine
properly during your test.

Bottom line: maximum range is found at L/Dmax, and this airspeed is almost
always significantly slower than normal cruise speed. In most aircraft, you
can significantly increase your range simply by flying slower.

(The above is all only valid in no-wind conditions...add a tailwind or
headwind and it becomes more complicated, since you need to speed up in a
headwind and slow down in a tailwind in order to achieve best range).

Pete


  #2  
Old February 18th 04, 01:55 PM
Dennis O'Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Good explanantion, Pete... For those interested in these topics I suggest
they start with Alex Strojniks three books on laminar flow aircraft, and
delve into Martin Hollmans series on Modern Aircraft Design... Then they
can google on Kent Phaser, Barnaby Wainfan, and Harry Riblett, for more
information..
denny
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Stealth Pilot" wrote in message
...
[...] it seems to take the same amount of energy to move the aircraft

the
distance. all you vary with rpm is the rate of energy conversion and
the air speed.


I don't know how you did your test, or what the specific airspeeds are for
the Tailwind, but generally speaking, Bob's statement was exactly correct.

It does not take the same amount of energy to move the aircraft a given
distance. The amount of energy depends on a variety of things, but the
biggest variable in the equation is airspeed (most other factors are
constant). The least amount of fuel will be used at the airspeed that
corresponds to maximum lift-to-drag ratio, and for most aircraft, this
airspeed is well below the normal cruising airspeed.

This is because in level cruise flight, lift is constant, so at L/Dmax,

drag
as at a minimum, and drag is what the fuel you're burning is working
against. Less drag means less fuel required, even for the same distance.

I doubt that the Tailwind's L/Dmax is at or above 114 knots (though,

there's
no theoretical reason it couldn't be, I guess), which means that there IS

a
speed below 114 knots at which fuel consumption would have been less. Of
course, if 70 knots is below *that* speed, then what you found was the
increase in drag that occurs as you slow down further below L/Dmax.

Another possibility, of course, is that you simply forgot to lean the

engine
properly during your test.

Bottom line: maximum range is found at L/Dmax, and this airspeed is almost
always significantly slower than normal cruise speed. In most aircraft,

you
can significantly increase your range simply by flying slower.

(The above is all only valid in no-wind conditions...add a tailwind or
headwind and it becomes more complicated, since you need to speed up in a
headwind and slow down in a tailwind in order to achieve best range).

Pete




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should I consider this plane - weird engine history [email protected] Owning 12 February 3rd 05 12:18 AM
ROP masking of engine problems Roger Long Owning 4 September 27th 04 07:36 PM
Lancair Columbia 400: The World's Fastest Certified Piston Single Engine Aircraft! David Ross Aviation Marketplace 0 August 24th 04 07:13 PM
Real stats on engine failures? Captain Wubba Piloting 127 December 8th 03 04:09 PM
The "Lightweight" Fighter is on the verge of overtaking the F-105 as the heaviest single engine fighter of all time. Talk about irony. Scott Ferrin Military Aviation 1 November 24th 03 03:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.