Stupid Attorney taling about GPS's

Tarver Engineering wrote:

All the prosecution needs is a Professional Land Surveyor, as registered by
the State of California. At that point Scott's Attorney would be well on
his way to giving testimony illegally.

1. Attorneys do not "give testimony".
2. There's no law against attorneys making false statements. They aren't under
oath.

George Patterson
A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that
you look forward to the trip.

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...

2. There's no law against attorneys making false statements.

If there was, courtrooms would become awfully quiet all over the country.

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Tarver Engineering wrote:

All the prosecution needs is a Professional Land Surveyor, as registered
by
the State of California. At that point Scott's Attorney would be well
on
his way to giving testimony illegally.

1. Attorneys do not "give testimony".

Clinton was disbarred over his attorny giving false testimony before the
court.

2. There's no law against attorneys making false statements. They aren't
under
oath.

you are mistaken.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Tarver Engineering wrote:

All the prosecution needs is a Professional Land Surveyor, as
registered
by
the State of California. At that point Scott's Attorney would be well
on
his way to giving testimony illegally.

1. Attorneys do not "give testimony".

Clinton was disbarred over his attorny [sic] giving false testimony before
the
court.

You are inaccurate in several respects. Clinton's license was suspended
for a specific period of time; he was not disbarred. He negotiated a
settlement with the Arkansas bar which had served him with a grievance
complaint for giving false testimony in a _Jones v. Clinton_ deposition.

2. There's no law against attorneys making false statements. They aren't
under
oath.

you are mistaken.

An attorney who knowingly misleads a court violates the canons of
professional ethics and is subject to discipline by the court and the bar.
He does not have to be under oath. However, if an attorney gives
materially false testimony while under oath he is also guilty of perjury,
ordinarily a felony.

" jls" wrote in message
. ..

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Tarver Engineering wrote:

All the prosecution needs is a Professional Land Surveyor, as
registered
by
the State of California. At that point Scott's Attorney would be
well
on
his way to giving testimony illegally.

1. Attorneys do not "give testimony".

Clinton was disbarred over his attorny [sic] giving false testimony
before
the
court.

You are inaccurate in several respects. Clinton's license was suspended
for a specific period of time; he was not disbarred. He negotiated a
settlement with the Arkansas bar which had served him with a grievance
complaint for giving false testimony in a _Jones v. Clinton_ deposition.

No, Clinton was disbarred for his Attorney giving false testimony in Federal
District Court. If the Jones v clinton lawsuit had been reopened, clinto
would have forfeited his Attorney client rights.

2. There's no law against attorneys making false statements. They
aren't under
oath.

you are mistaken.

An attorney who knowingly misleads a court violates the canons of
professional ethics and is subject to discipline by the court and the bar.
He does not have to be under oath. However, if an attorney gives
materially false testimony while under oath he is also guilty of perjury,
ordinarily a felony.

If your Attorney gives false information before the Court and you are aware
of it, Arkansas Law holds the client liable.

" jls" wrote

However, if an attorney gives
materially false testimony while under oath he is also guilty of perjury,
ordinarily a felony.

Unless your name is Bill Clinton. I still can't believe we didn't throw
that clown out on his ear, then throw him in jail. Now, unless you stick
yur "dickie" in someone, it isn't sex. Jeeesh .
--
Jim in NC


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 2/6/04

"Morgans" wrote in message
...
Unless your name is Bill Clinton. I still can't believe we didn't throw
that clown out on his ear, then throw him in jail.

I still can't believe you're not in my killfile yet.

As far as Clinton goes, it's ancient history. Get over it. Move on. Get
on with your life, assuming you have one.

As far as Clinton goes, it's ancient history.

And you've forgiven Nixon, right?

Clinton, like Nixon, was among the worst blots ever to stain the
American presidency.

Far from "getting over it" or "moving on," I would say: "Those who do
not study history are condemned to repeat it."


all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...

As far as Clinton goes, it's ancient history.

And you've forgiven Nixon, right?

That's a preposterous analogy, for a couple of reasons:

1) How many off-topic posts do you see on this newsgroup spontaneously
complaining about Nixon? I can't think of any.

2) Nixon slaughtered hundreds of thousands of South Vietnamese because they
had the temerity to defend themselves against a US invasion, as they had
done previously against the French and the Japanese. He subverted the US
constitution by using federal agencies to commit crimes against his
political opponents. He resigned the presidency in the face of imminent
overwhelming votes for impeachment and conviction. He would have gone to
prison (as did 25 members of his administration, including four cabinet
members), had he not been preemptively pardoned by his own former vice
president.

Far from "getting over it" or "moving on," I would say: "Those who do
not study history are condemned to repeat it."

Good principle, preposterous instantiation. You think it's important for
people to continue to complain to an aviation newsgroup about Clinton's sex
scandal in order to protect the Republic from the possibility that another
president will get a blow job and lie about it?

--Gary

Our system of lifetime professional politicians attracts those with huge
egos and a burning desire to forego gainful employment.. The public feed
trough attracts these types like moths to a burning flame... It will only
end if we 'ever' put strict term limits on every elected position above dog
catcher..
denny
"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...

As far as Clinton goes, it's ancient history.

And you've forgiven Nixon, right?

Clinton, like Nixon, was among the worst blots ever to stain the
American presidency.

Far from "getting over it" or "moving on," I would say: "Those who do
not study history are condemned to repeat it."


all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com