A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Stupid Attorney taling about GPS's



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 19th 04, 12:49 PM
Ron Rosenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:10:41 GMT, Peter wrote:

Unaugmented GPS has insufficient integrity monitoring.
http://www.cts.cv.ic.ac.uk/html/Rese...p?seminarID=62
:
"The assessment results also indicated that the current GPS system cannot
meet the RNP in most of the cases and the current integrity monitoring
mechanism is inadequate for providing the necessary integrity monitoring
capability. Therefore, this study suggests that augmentation systems are
needed to support the navigation function for all phases of flight." Jan.
28, 2004, Imperial College, London, Dr. Shaojun.


I looked at the link you posted. It seems to be a summary of what is
intended to be presented at a seminar, with no associated evidence. It is
also not clear as to what Shaojun's definition of "inadequate" is.

It is not clear to me what method of integrity monitoring is going on in
the British airspace to which Shaojun refers, but it seems to be
unaugmented RAIM.

The summary indicates that his study "route" was London to New York. But
my understanding is that trans-oceanic flights have to have multiple
navigation systems, only one of which can be GPS.




Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
  #2  
Old February 19th 04, 03:35 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:10:41 GMT, Peter wrote:

Unaugmented GPS has insufficient integrity monitoring.


http://www.cts.cv.ic.ac.uk/html/Rese...ls.asp?seminar

ID=62
:
"The assessment results also indicated that the current GPS system cannot
meet the RNP in most of the cases and the current integrity monitoring
mechanism is inadequate for providing the necessary integrity monitoring
capability. Therefore, this study suggests that augmentation systems are
needed to support the navigation function for all phases of flight." Jan.
28, 2004, Imperial College, London, Dr. Shaojun.


I looked at the link you posted. It seems to be a summary of what is
intended to be presented at a seminar, with no associated evidence. It is
also not clear as to what Shaojun's definition of "inadequate" is.


What is clear is that Peter has a tad more ego than knowledge.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ ihuvpe Chris Instrument Flight Rules 43 December 19th 04 09:40 PM
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_ unakm Aardvark J. Bandersnatch, MP General Aviation 2 December 17th 04 11:37 PM
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ gitqexec OtisWinslow Owning 9 November 12th 04 06:34 PM
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________ efamf Keith Willshaw Naval Aviation 4 November 11th 04 01:51 AM
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ihuvpe john smith Instrument Flight Rules 1 November 9th 04 03:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.