![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rick Durden" wrote in message
m... You have got to expand your horizons g. That's always been true. In a number of the Piper singles the gear does come down if the engine takes the day off. But not because of the failure of the hydraulic system. Kyler's comment clearly was based on an assumption that without engine power, there would be no hydraulic pressure, and that without pressure, the gear would drop (the first assumption being the incorrect one, but the second is incorrect in other airplanes as well). And actually, while I haven't flown the Pipers you're referring to, my understanding is that the gear extension was based on airspeed, not engine power. Your comment about the behavior of such systems in icing conditions would seem to reinforce this understanding. Perhaps you could elaborate on why it is you say that engine failure alone will result in the gear extending. Or perhaps you meant that the drop in airspeed that normally results after an engine failure (to achieve best glide) is enough to cause the gear to extend. In which case I'd argue that it wasn't the engine failure, but the airspeed change that caused the gear to extend (I'd also wonder why the system was designed such that the activation airspeed was at or above best glide...seems pretty non-optimal to me). Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
Safety features sometimes spawn new hazards while eliminating old ones. The automatic gear extension system is a good example. "At high density altitudes," relates one owner, "the gear sometimes drops after it has been retracted. This, of course, nullifies any climb!" Indeed, there have been incidents in which the airplane might have been able to climb out safely had the gear not dropped at the wrong moment, causing a stall/mush into the terrain. Then there are Arrow pilots who lose their engines and decide to ditch with the gear up. Unfortunately, some forget to override the automatic extension system. The gear plops out seconds before splash down-sending the Arrow head over heels. Such mishaps are rare-we only counted a few (none fatal) in our five-year survey. But in mid-1987 Piper, then owned by Lear-Siegler, ordered the system deactivated because of concern over liability suits. It sold kits to do so, and told customers it wouldn't provide parts to repair the existing system. Piper sold 1,400 kits. One year later, Piper-then owned by M. Stuart Millar-withdrew its order to deactivate the automatic extension system, provided that pilots "take the necessary actions to assure that any pilot flying these aircraft are fully advised of the system and its proper operation." In part, Piper was responding to the complaints of irate owners who believed the system worked often enough to be desirable. snip *************************************** Throttle coming back to a certain point actuates a microswitch and/or the airspeed dropping to 95 knots drops the gear... There was an override, but you had to remember to actuate it... Every Arrow that I was involved with had the autoextension deactivated, period... Can't have the airplane killing me, I can do a fine job of that all on my own... denny |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Dennis O'Connor" said:
Then there are Arrow pilots who lose their engines and decide to ditch with the gear up. Unfortunately, some forget to override the automatic extension system. The gear plops out seconds before splash down-sending the Arrow head over heels. First item in the emergency checklist is to put the gear override on. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ Microsoft - Where quality is job 1.0.1 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Peter Duniho" said:
And actually, while I haven't flown the Pipers you're referring to, my understanding is that the gear extension was based on airspeed, not engine power. Your comment about the behavior of such systems in icing conditions The POH for the Lance isn't 100% clear on this, but my understanding is that with the emergency gear extension, the gear will come down if you go below a certain manifold pressure at one speed, or will come down regardless of the manifold pressure at a lower speed. The POH says "Some aircraft also incorporate a pressure sensing device in the system which lowers the gear regardless of gear selector position, depending upon airspeed and engine power (propellor slipstream). Gear extension is designed to occur, even if the selector is in the up position, at airspeeds below approximately 103 KIAS with power off. The extension speeds will vary from approximately 91 kts to approximately 103 KIAS depending on power settings and altitude." Actually, reading that again, it's possible that what is happening isn't that it comes on at a lower speed if you have power on, but that the propellor slipstream holds the gear up against the springs if you have power on. Sometimes I learn more answering other people's questions than I do getting answers to my own. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
... The POH for the Lance isn't 100% clear on this, but my understanding is that with the emergency gear extension, the gear will come down if you go below a certain manifold pressure at one speed, or will come down regardless of the manifold pressure at a lower speed. Well, if it's manifold pressure based, then an engine failure would only cause the gear to come down if the failure was caused by a blocked air intake, or if the pilot later pulled the throttle to idle. Again, an engine failure would not, in and of itself, necessarily cause the gear to extend. [...] Actually, reading that again, it's possible that what is happening isn't that it comes on at a lower speed if you have power on, but that the propellor slipstream holds the gear up against the springs if you have power on. I don't know how the "propeller slipstream" could hold the gear up. The only "propeller slipstream" I'm aware of is the helical movement of the air around the fuselage, and compared to the other forces involved I doubt it's all that strong. I think it's interesting that the POH puts "propeller slipstream" in parentheses after "engine power", because to me it's not at all clear what they mean. The two aren't exactly equivalent, so it's odd they would use them as if they were. The parenthetical comment ought to add information, but to me it just confuses things. Pete |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Peter Duniho" said:
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message ... [...] Actually, reading that again, it's possible that what is happening isn't that it comes on at a lower speed if you have power on, but that the propellor slipstream holds the gear up against the springs if you have power on. I don't know how the "propeller slipstream" could hold the gear up. The only "propeller slipstream" I'm aware of is the helical movement of the air around the fuselage, and compared to the other forces involved I doubt it's all that strong. The air coming off the propellor is going faster relative to you than your air speed. If it wasn't, your propellor wouldn't be producing power. It makes perfect sense to me. Being behind the propellor disk, the nose gear (and possibly the mains) is experiencing more dynamic air pressure when the engine is producing power than if you were gliding at the same speed. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ Can I LART an aol'r for attempting to subscribe to a majordomo list with their street address, or should I wait for a second offence? -- Allan Stojanovic |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
... The air coming off the propellor is going faster relative to you than your air speed. If it wasn't, your propellor wouldn't be producing power. It makes perfect sense to me. Being behind the propellor disk, the nose gear (and possibly the mains) is experiencing more dynamic air pressure when the engine is producing power than if you were gliding at the same speed. Hmmm...I suppose so. It still seems to me like the gear enjoys such a small portion of the overall prop thrust, and that the difference in prop thrust airspeed and airframe airspeed is greatly reduced at or near cruise airspeeds. But I admit, I can't imagine what else the POH could be talking about. Still, it doesn't explain why an engine failure would in and of itself cause the gear to extend. Presumably the hydraulic pressure is still holding the gear up; the prop thrust would be a backup for that, not the sole mechanism for holding the gear up. The extension mechanism still would need to be triggered by airspeed or MP changes. Right? Pete |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Peter Duniho" said:
Still, it doesn't explain why an engine failure would in and of itself cause the gear to extend. Presumably the hydraulic pressure is still holding the gear up; the prop thrust would be a backup for that, not the sole mechanism for holding the gear up. The extension mechanism still would need to be triggered by airspeed or MP changes. Right? If the hydraulic system was still holding pressure, then I think you're right. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ What happens if a big asteroid hits the Earth? Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and a common laboratory frog, we can assume it will be pretty bad. -- Dave Barry |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:34:18 +0000 (UTC),
(Paul Tomblin) wrote: big snip Actually, reading that again, it's possible that what is happening isn't that it comes on at a lower speed if you have power on, but that the propellor slipstream holds the gear up against the springs if you have power on. little snip A crude "pitot" head (located within the propeller slipstream) provides the combined airspeed/prop stream pressure input to the "super high tech auto extension device"-which consists of a crude diaphram balanced against a pair of ground adjustable springs attached to a parking brake valve plumbed between the "up" and "down" hydraulic lines. The diaphram sees lower airspeed + higher slipstream the same as it sees higher airspeed + lower slipstream. If the combined "sense" pressure is higher than the spring pressure, the gear stay up. If the sense pressure drops below the spring pressure, the mechanism trips, and the park brake valve opens, allowing hydraulic fluid trapped in the "up" line to flow into the "down" line. The mains fall out via gravity, the nose does the same with a spring assist. As others have mentioned, the trapped "up" pressure is what holds the gear in the wells, there are no mechanical up-locks. There are strictly mechanical spring-loaded down-locks that hold the drag/side braces in an over-center position. With normal or emergency extension, these mechanical downlocks are all that is holding the gear down, there is no "down" pressure in the system with the gear down-and-locked. The switches that turn the green lights on (and turn the electro-hydraulic pump off) are driven directly off of these mechanical down-locks. Turning the auto extension "off" mechanically pins the trip linkage into the park brake valve closed position, irrespective of "sensed" diaphram pressure. The SB to remove the auto extension feature removes the diaphram from the loop, and the valve stays in the closed position during normal operation. The lever that useta be used for auto extension, is now used to mechanically open the valve to allow emergency extension if desired. The really, really neat part is adjusting the balance springs standing on your head in the back of the airplane while the test pilot repeatedly accelerates and decelerates (airspeed pressure), and varies power setting (prop stream pressure) until you get the durn thing adjusted so it works... Hope some of this helps; TC P.S. the "smallest" hydraulic gear airplane that I am aware of with a totally independent back-up emergency extension system is the Cheyenne II XL. It has a secondary set of pneumatic actuators that un-up-lock and assist/extend the gear pneumatically using 4 cute little CO2 bottles (Mr. Laird very likely has a similiar bottle) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, said:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:34:18 +0000 (UTC), (Paul Tomblin) wrote: big snip Actually, reading that again, it's possible that what is happening isn't that it comes on at a lower speed if you have power on, but that the propellor slipstream holds the gear up against the springs if you have power on. little snip A crude "pitot" head (located within the propeller slipstream) Oh duh. Of course. I forgot the pitot was in the slipstream as well. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "It is my prayer that other Americans will fully realize that to condone the whittling away of the rights of any one minority group is to pave the way for us all to lose the guarantees of the Constitution" - Harold L. Ickes |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance | [email protected] | Owning | 5 | July 22nd 03 12:35 AM |