![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Kyler Laird said:
Is there a placard that says "Do not lose engine power in excess of max. gear extension speed."? There would be no need for such a placard. Yeah, it looks like it would need to be "Do not leak hydraulic fluid in excess of max. gear extension speed." On the Lance (which is the only plane I have any experience with), even if you lost hydraulic fluid, air pressure would hold the gear up against the springs until you dropped down to max gear extension speed. I suspect you'd get a bit more drag from the gear drooping slightly into the airstream, though. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ You can be jailed for lying about being good in bed. -- Lionel, paraphrasing the Criminal Code of Canada, 159(3)(b)(i) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Tomblin wrote:
On the Lance (which is the only plane I have any experience with), even if you lost hydraulic fluid, air pressure would hold the gear up against the springs until you dropped down to max gear extension speed. I suspect you'd get a bit more drag from the gear drooping slightly into the airstream, though. Okay Paul, I have to ask you to explain those two statements. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, john smith said:
Paul Tomblin wrote: On the Lance (which is the only plane I have any experience with), even if you lost hydraulic fluid, air pressure would hold the gear up against the springs until you dropped down to max gear extension speed. I suspect you'd get a bit more drag from the gear drooping slightly into the airstream, though. Okay Paul, I have to ask you to explain those two statements. What don't you understand? In the Lance, the hydraulic system is there to raise the gear. Besides manually lowering the gear, there is an automatic gear extension system and a manual emergency gear extension system. If you activate the manual emergency gear extension system, springs and gravity bring the gear down - I'm not entirely clear if hydraulic pressure helps bring them down if you use the normal gear extension. The description of the emergency gear extension system in the POH says that the speed the gear will come down is lower if the plane is developing power because the prop slipstream holds it up. I'm told (I haven't verified it yet) that if you activate the emergency gear extension when you're above max gear speed, the gear won't come down, but will come down slightly into the airstream developing drag. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "The way I see it, unless we each conform, unless we obey orders, unless we follow our leaders blindly, there is no possible way we can remain free." - John Ashcroft^W^WFrank Burns |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, john smith said: Paul Tomblin wrote: On the Lance (which is the only plane I have any experience with), even if you lost hydraulic fluid, air pressure would hold the gear up against the springs until you dropped down to max gear extension speed. I suspect you'd get a bit more drag from the gear drooping slightly into the airstream, though. Okay Paul, I have to ask you to explain those two statements. What don't you understand? In the Lance, the hydraulic system is there to raise the gear. Besides manually lowering the gear, there is an automatic gear extension system and a manual emergency gear extension system. If you activate the manual emergency gear extension system, springs and gravity bring the gear down - I'm not entirely clear if hydraulic pressure helps bring them down if you use the normal gear extension. The description of the emergency gear extension system in the POH says that the speed the gear will come down is lower if the plane is developing power because the prop slipstream holds it up. I'm told (I haven't verified it yet) that if you activate the emergency gear extension when you're above max gear speed, the gear won't come down, but will come down slightly into the airstream developing drag. I do not believe the air flowing under the wings will hold the gear up. If the hydraulic pressure is released, the gear will come down. If you are flying fast, the air may grab the gear doors and possibly rip them off or otherwise torque/twist the gear (whichever comes first). Look up stories about the P-51B (or C?) and the redesign of the gear uplock. Granted, you do not have the Mustang's cruise speed, but the principle is the same if you exceed Vge/Vgo. The override prevents the gear from automatically deploying. You still have to push the lever to release the hydraulic pressure to enable the gear to drop. The POH further says to kick the rudder right and left to create a sideward airload on the gear to lock it into position. In some cases, you must stall the aircraft to get the nosegear to lock by penduluming forward as the nose drops and airload is decreased. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Paul Tomblin) writes:
Yeah, it looks like it would need to be "Do not leak hydraulic fluid in excess of max. gear extension speed." On the Lance (which is the only plane I have any experience with), even if you lost hydraulic fluid, air pressure would hold the gear up against the springs until you dropped down to max gear extension speed. I suspect you'd get a bit more drag from the gear drooping slightly into the airstream, though. Now *that* makes sense. I caught that there was a sensor connected to the pitot tube that interacted with the gear, but it's clever to use airflow to keep it from dropping on its own too soon. Thank you for explaining it. (BTW, some of my confusion with hydraulics is because of my background with farm machinery where the oil flows through the valve when "off" - not because the explanations in this thread were misleading.) --kyler |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance | [email protected] | Owning | 5 | July 22nd 03 12:35 AM |