![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Peter Duniho" said:
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message ... [...] Actually, reading that again, it's possible that what is happening isn't that it comes on at a lower speed if you have power on, but that the propellor slipstream holds the gear up against the springs if you have power on. I don't know how the "propeller slipstream" could hold the gear up. The only "propeller slipstream" I'm aware of is the helical movement of the air around the fuselage, and compared to the other forces involved I doubt it's all that strong. The air coming off the propellor is going faster relative to you than your air speed. If it wasn't, your propellor wouldn't be producing power. It makes perfect sense to me. Being behind the propellor disk, the nose gear (and possibly the mains) is experiencing more dynamic air pressure when the engine is producing power than if you were gliding at the same speed. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ Can I LART an aol'r for attempting to subscribe to a majordomo list with their street address, or should I wait for a second offence? -- Allan Stojanovic |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
... The air coming off the propellor is going faster relative to you than your air speed. If it wasn't, your propellor wouldn't be producing power. It makes perfect sense to me. Being behind the propellor disk, the nose gear (and possibly the mains) is experiencing more dynamic air pressure when the engine is producing power than if you were gliding at the same speed. Hmmm...I suppose so. It still seems to me like the gear enjoys such a small portion of the overall prop thrust, and that the difference in prop thrust airspeed and airframe airspeed is greatly reduced at or near cruise airspeeds. But I admit, I can't imagine what else the POH could be talking about. Still, it doesn't explain why an engine failure would in and of itself cause the gear to extend. Presumably the hydraulic pressure is still holding the gear up; the prop thrust would be a backup for that, not the sole mechanism for holding the gear up. The extension mechanism still would need to be triggered by airspeed or MP changes. Right? Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Peter Duniho" said:
Still, it doesn't explain why an engine failure would in and of itself cause the gear to extend. Presumably the hydraulic pressure is still holding the gear up; the prop thrust would be a backup for that, not the sole mechanism for holding the gear up. The extension mechanism still would need to be triggered by airspeed or MP changes. Right? If the hydraulic system was still holding pressure, then I think you're right. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ What happens if a big asteroid hits the Earth? Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and a common laboratory frog, we can assume it will be pretty bad. -- Dave Barry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance | [email protected] | Owning | 5 | July 22nd 03 12:35 AM |