![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:ITU%b.426694$na.929519@attbi_s04... How does it feel to have turbine time in your logbook? Well, TECHNICALLY, not being multi-engine rated, I suppose I can't legally log the time. And TECHNICALLY, Ron's not a CFI, so I guess I can't legally can't log the time. You can log whatever you want. You just can't use the time toward some FAA requirement. Make sure it's noted/excluded somehow, and otherwise put it in the log book however you want. But you know what? I'm not building hours for anything or anyone. I'm gonna write 'em in the book anyway! :-) I'm still trying to figure out why TECHNICALLY you are permitted to manipulate the controls during a for-pay charter flight, even if the flight is under Part 91. I suspect you broke an FAR somewhere, but I admit that I don't know where that FAR might be. Not in Part 91, I know that. If the flight is part 91 then it is subject to part 91 rules, none of which would forbid even a non-pilot from operating the controls. The flight is not really a charter. A doctor donates the use of his airplane and pilot to fly a mission for a related party. Hardly unusual and certainly well within the limits of part 91. Now, whether the flight violated school sports recruiting standards might be another matter. :-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... If the flight is part 91 then it is subject to part 91 rules, none of which would forbid even a non-pilot from operating the controls. The flight is not really a charter. A doctor donates the use of his airplane and pilot to fly a mission for a related party. Hardly unusual and certainly well within the limits of part 91. Now, whether the flight violated school sports recruiting standards might be another matter. :-) Hey, Jay!! If it was the University of Colorado, they might have had a stripper on-board. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey, Jay!! If it was the University of Colorado, they might have had a
stripper on-board. A true sign that I'm getting older: If I had to choose between having the stripper on board, with me as a passenger -- or me on board, acting as co-pilot in the right seat -- I'd choose the right seat. Sad, ain't it? Actually, now that I think about it, I guess that choice can't be made until we know the ground rules with the stripper, can it? ;-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Honeck wrote: If I had to choose between having the stripper on board, with me as a passenger -- or me on board, acting as co-pilot in the right seat -- I'd choose the right seat. You don't usually get to handle the controls with a stripper. :-( George Patterson A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you look forward to the trip. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Jay Honeck wrote: If I had to choose between having the stripper on board, with me as a passenger -- or me on board, acting as co-pilot in the right seat -- I'd choose the right seat. You don't usually get to handle the controls with a stripper. :-( Which "controls" are you referring to? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tom Sixkiller wrote: You don't usually get to handle the controls with a stripper. :-( Which "controls" are you referring to? The tuning knobs, of course. George Patterson A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you look forward to the trip. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G.R. Patterson III wrote:
You don't usually get to handle the controls with a stripper. :-( Which "controls" are you referring to? The tuning knobs, of course. Reminds me of an old Reader's Digest, Campus Comedy tale... A yound coed was having difficulty opening the drawers of her dorm room bureau, so she put in a request for maintenance. A day later, she was in the midst of changing when a knock came at the door. She quickly through on a robe and answered the door. It was the maintence man, who announced, "Hi, I'm here to fix the knobs on your chest." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C.J.
Jay only handled the controls during the repositioning portion of flight. No passengers/customers were aboard during this time. Is the C90 rated for single pilot? If so, anyone pilot desires can occupy the right seat even a passenger or customer. Am I correct and will this make someone sleep better ![]() Big John For what's it's worth. I used to let none rated fly both Heavy Iron and GA. Even got my Flight Surgeon proficient enough he could have landed the T-33 if I had had a heart attack. Sure made my annual physical easier G Welcome aboard Jay. On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:42:11 -0800, "C J Campbell" wrote: "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:ITU%b.426694$na.929519@attbi_s04... How does it feel to have turbine time in your logbook? Well, TECHNICALLY, not being multi-engine rated, I suppose I can't legally log the time. And TECHNICALLY, Ron's not a CFI, so I guess I can't legally can't log the time. You can log whatever you want. You just can't use the time toward some FAA requirement. Make sure it's noted/excluded somehow, and otherwise put it in the log book however you want. But you know what? I'm not building hours for anything or anyone. I'm gonna write 'em in the book anyway! :-) I'm still trying to figure out why TECHNICALLY you are permitted to manipulate the controls during a for-pay charter flight, even if the flight is under Part 91. I suspect you broke an FAR somewhere, but I admit that I don't know where that FAR might be. Not in Part 91, I know that. If the flight is part 91 then it is subject to part 91 rules, none of which would forbid even a non-pilot from operating the controls. The flight is not really a charter. A doctor donates the use of his airplane and pilot to fly a mission for a related party. Hardly unusual and certainly well within the limits of part 91. Now, whether the flight violated school sports recruiting standards might be another matter. :-) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Big John" wrote in message ... C.J. Jay only handled the controls during the repositioning portion of flight. No passengers/customers were aboard during this time. Is the C90 rated for single pilot? If so, anyone pilot desires can occupy the right seat even a passenger or customer. Am I correct and will this make someone sleep better ![]() Big John For what's it's worth. I used to let none rated fly both Heavy Iron and GA. Even got my Flight Surgeon proficient enough he could have landed the T-33 if I had had a heart attack. Sure made my annual physical easier G Welcome aboard Jay. The C90 is rated for single pilot. In fact, it requires no type rating at all. It is fairly easy to fly, but I still have to think that flying a multi-engine turboprop single pilot IFR has to be one of the most exhausting jobs in aviation. FTR, I was not the one worried about Jay handling the controls. I suspect his biggest problem was a tendency to taxi too fast. Everyone does that first time out in a King Air. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C.J.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:18:02 -0800, "C J Campbell" wrote: ----clip---- The C90 is rated for single pilot. In fact, it requires no type rating at all. It is fairly easy to fly, but I still have to think that flying a multi-engine turboprop single pilot IFR has to be one of the most exhausting jobs in aviation. `````````````````````````````````````````````````` ``````````````````````` All single pilot IFR is exhausting. Most of my IFR was single pilot in single and multi engine birds. Good pre planning helps a lot until all hell breaks loose ![]() `````````````````````````````````````````````````` ```````````````````````` FTR, I was not the one worried about Jay handling the controls. I suspect his biggest problem was a tendency to taxi too fast. Everyone does that first time out in a King Air. `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````` C.J. know that. I just hooked my comments behind yours to try to keep in line on all the comments made. Sorry. If he was in 'ground idle', speed was probably fast without a lot of brake. Does the C90 have 'beta'? I used 'beta' in some of the birds I flew to take some of the prop pitch off taxing so wouldn't wear the brakes out. Long time ago in a land far away ![]() Big John |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I'M GOING TO DIE TODAY. | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | February 4th 04 09:44 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt" WWII Double Feature at Zeno'sDrive-In | Zeno | Aerobatics | 0 | August 2nd 03 07:31 PM |
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt": An Awesome WWII DoubleFeature at Zeno's Drive-In | zeno | Military Aviation | 0 | July 14th 03 07:31 PM |
The Yankee Lady Flew Today | Tom Huxton | Piloting | 0 | July 11th 03 11:57 PM |