A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Got to land a King Air 90 today...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 28th 04, 06:42 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:ITU%b.426694$na.929519@attbi_s04...
How does it feel to have turbine time in your logbook?


Well, TECHNICALLY, not being multi-engine rated, I suppose I can't

legally
log the time.

And TECHNICALLY, Ron's not a CFI, so I guess I can't legally can't log

the
time.


You can log whatever you want. You just can't use the time toward some

FAA
requirement. Make sure it's noted/excluded somehow, and otherwise put it

in
the log book however you want.

But you know what? I'm not building hours for anything or anyone. I'm
gonna write 'em in the book anyway! :-)


I'm still trying to figure out why TECHNICALLY you are permitted to
manipulate the controls during a for-pay charter flight, even if the

flight
is under Part 91.

I suspect you broke an FAR somewhere, but I admit that I don't know where
that FAR might be. Not in Part 91, I know that.


If the flight is part 91 then it is subject to part 91 rules, none of which
would forbid even a non-pilot from operating the controls.

The flight is not really a charter. A doctor donates the use of his airplane
and pilot to fly a mission for a related party. Hardly unusual and certainly
well within the limits of part 91. Now, whether the flight violated school
sports recruiting standards might be another matter. :-)


  #2  
Old February 28th 04, 07:39 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

If the flight is part 91 then it is subject to part 91 rules, none of

which
would forbid even a non-pilot from operating the controls.

The flight is not really a charter. A doctor donates the use of his

airplane
and pilot to fly a mission for a related party. Hardly unusual and

certainly
well within the limits of part 91. Now, whether the flight violated school
sports recruiting standards might be another matter. :-)


Hey, Jay!! If it was the University of Colorado, they might have had a
stripper on-board.



  #3  
Old February 28th 04, 01:48 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hey, Jay!! If it was the University of Colorado, they might have had a
stripper on-board.


A true sign that I'm getting older:

If I had to choose between having the stripper on board, with me as a
passenger -- or me on board, acting as co-pilot in the right seat -- I'd
choose the right seat.

Sad, ain't it?

Actually, now that I think about it, I guess that choice can't be made until
we know the ground rules with the stripper, can it?

;-)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #4  
Old February 28th 04, 04:12 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Jay Honeck wrote:

If I had to choose between having the stripper on board, with me as a
passenger -- or me on board, acting as co-pilot in the right seat -- I'd
choose the right seat.


You don't usually get to handle the controls with a stripper. :-(

George Patterson
A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that
you look forward to the trip.
  #5  
Old February 29th 04, 06:44 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Jay Honeck wrote:

If I had to choose between having the stripper on board, with me as a
passenger -- or me on board, acting as co-pilot in the right seat -- I'd
choose the right seat.


You don't usually get to handle the controls with a stripper. :-(


Which "controls" are you referring to?


  #6  
Old February 29th 04, 03:52 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Tom Sixkiller wrote:

You don't usually get to handle the controls with a stripper. :-(


Which "controls" are you referring to?


The tuning knobs, of course.

George Patterson
A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that
you look forward to the trip.
  #7  
Old February 29th 04, 06:08 PM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

G.R. Patterson III wrote:
You don't usually get to handle the controls with a stripper. :-(


Which "controls" are you referring to?


The tuning knobs, of course.


Reminds me of an old Reader's Digest, Campus Comedy tale...

A yound coed was having difficulty opening the drawers of her dorm room
bureau, so she put in a request for maintenance.

A day later, she was in the midst of changing when a knock came at the
door. She quickly through on a robe and answered the door.

It was the maintence man, who announced, "Hi, I'm here to fix the knobs
on your chest."

  #8  
Old February 28th 04, 03:41 PM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C.J.

Jay only handled the controls during the repositioning portion of
flight. No passengers/customers were aboard during this time.

Is the C90 rated for single pilot? If so, anyone pilot desires can
occupy the right seat even a passenger or customer.

Am I correct and will this make someone sleep better )

Big John

For what's it's worth. I used to let none rated fly both Heavy Iron
and GA. Even got my Flight Surgeon proficient enough he could have
landed the T-33 if I had had a heart attack. Sure made my annual
physical easier G

Welcome aboard Jay.


On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:42:11 -0800, "C J Campbell"
wrote:


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:ITU%b.426694$na.929519@attbi_s04...
How does it feel to have turbine time in your logbook?

Well, TECHNICALLY, not being multi-engine rated, I suppose I can't

legally
log the time.

And TECHNICALLY, Ron's not a CFI, so I guess I can't legally can't log

the
time.


You can log whatever you want. You just can't use the time toward some

FAA
requirement. Make sure it's noted/excluded somehow, and otherwise put it

in
the log book however you want.

But you know what? I'm not building hours for anything or anyone. I'm
gonna write 'em in the book anyway! :-)


I'm still trying to figure out why TECHNICALLY you are permitted to
manipulate the controls during a for-pay charter flight, even if the

flight
is under Part 91.

I suspect you broke an FAR somewhere, but I admit that I don't know where
that FAR might be. Not in Part 91, I know that.


If the flight is part 91 then it is subject to part 91 rules, none of which
would forbid even a non-pilot from operating the controls.

The flight is not really a charter. A doctor donates the use of his airplane
and pilot to fly a mission for a related party. Hardly unusual and certainly
well within the limits of part 91. Now, whether the flight violated school
sports recruiting standards might be another matter. :-)


  #9  
Old February 28th 04, 04:18 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Big John" wrote in message
...
C.J.

Jay only handled the controls during the repositioning portion of
flight. No passengers/customers were aboard during this time.

Is the C90 rated for single pilot? If so, anyone pilot desires can
occupy the right seat even a passenger or customer.

Am I correct and will this make someone sleep better )

Big John

For what's it's worth. I used to let none rated fly both Heavy Iron
and GA. Even got my Flight Surgeon proficient enough he could have
landed the T-33 if I had had a heart attack. Sure made my annual
physical easier G

Welcome aboard Jay.


The C90 is rated for single pilot. In fact, it requires no type rating at
all. It is fairly easy to fly, but I still have to think that flying a
multi-engine turboprop single pilot IFR has to be one of the most exhausting
jobs in aviation.

FTR, I was not the one worried about Jay handling the controls. I suspect
his biggest problem was a tendency to taxi too fast. Everyone does that
first time out in a King Air.


  #10  
Old February 28th 04, 06:24 PM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C.J.


On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:18:02 -0800, "C J Campbell"
wrote:

----clip----

The C90 is rated for single pilot. In fact, it requires no type rating at
all. It is fairly easy to fly, but I still have to think that flying a
multi-engine turboprop single pilot IFR has to be one of the most exhausting
jobs in aviation.

`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ```````````````````````
All single pilot IFR is exhausting. Most of my IFR was single pilot in
single and multi engine birds. Good pre planning helps a lot until all
hell breaks loose (
`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ````````````````````````
FTR, I was not the one worried about Jay handling the controls. I suspect
his biggest problem was a tendency to taxi too fast. Everyone does that
first time out in a King Air.

`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ``````````````````````````
C.J. know that. I just hooked my comments behind yours to try to keep
in line on all the comments made. Sorry.

If he was in 'ground idle', speed was probably fast without a lot of
brake. Does the C90 have 'beta'? I used 'beta' in some of the birds I
flew to take some of the prop pitch off taxing so wouldn't wear the
brakes out.

Long time ago in a land far away )

Big John

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I'M GOING TO DIE TODAY. ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 February 4th 04 09:44 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt" WWII Double Feature at Zeno'sDrive-In Zeno Aerobatics 0 August 2nd 03 07:31 PM
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt": An Awesome WWII DoubleFeature at Zeno's Drive-In zeno Military Aviation 0 July 14th 03 07:31 PM
The Yankee Lady Flew Today Tom Huxton Piloting 0 July 11th 03 11:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.