![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The amazing thing is that none of these guys seem to understand that TFRs do
nothing to defeat terrorism unless we are ready, willing and able to shoot down all violators. Unless we are willing to do that, TFRs are just a nusance to the law abiding. Mike MU-2 "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message link.net... Its election year and, I guess that they have to have something to talk about...more to come we can be certain. Mike MU-2 Disturbing that all the sponsors of this amendment are Democrats, including our own Norm Dicks (whom I rather liked up until now). It appears that rather than making an issue of Republican security hysteria that the 'crats are trying instead to outdo them. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message link.net... The amazing thing is that none of these guys seem to understand that TFRs do nothing to defeat terrorism unless we are ready, willing and able to shoot down all violators. Like not understanding an issue has ever stopped them in the past? Unless we are willing to do that, TFRs are just a nusance to the law abiding. Most laws only target the law abiding...the bunch you don't have to worry about in the first place. (Let's not get a gun control thread going..shall we?) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message link.net... The amazing thing is that none of these guys seem to understand that TFRs do nothing to defeat terrorism unless we are ready, willing and able to shoot down all violators. Unless we are willing to do that, TFRs are just a nusance to the law abiding. Actually, the bill is an excellent example of why the Washington ADIZ should be changed to a prohibited area. We need to be protected from areas of dangerous legislation. Pilots and other members of the productive population cannot risk exposure to the brain-eating stupid waves radiating from such places. Best just to wall the whole place off. I doubt if the mutated inhabitants can be saved, anyway. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rapoport opined
The amazing thing is that none of these guys seem to understand that TFRs do nothing to defeat terrorism unless we are ready, willing and able to shoot down all violators. Unless we are willing to do that, TFRs are just a nusance to the law abiding. Finally, someone has stated the obvious. The bad news id that now the truth is out inthe open, all flights will need a federal marshall on board ![]() -ash Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 04 11:55 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Owning | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Owning | 0 | May 11th 04 10:36 PM |
MSNBC Reporting on GA Security Threat | Scott Schluer | Piloting | 44 | November 23rd 03 02:50 AM |