A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

when does a "remain clear" instruction end?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 1st 04, 12:59 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


When you establish communications again? Communications are established
just once for any arrival or through flight, thereafter those communications
are maintained.


Well, if some time passes between one transmission and another, then
communications will need to be re-established. How much time? Well, we can
yak all day about that. Certanly if the first transmission is on the ground
before runup, and the next transmission is in the air, it would be reasonable
to conclude that we are no longer talking about "the same conversation", and
(as per the original scenario) he can enter the class C upon the new
establishment of communications.

Jose



--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #2  
Old March 1st 04, 01:13 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

Well, if some time passes between one transmission and another, then
communications will need to be re-established.


Why?



How much time? Well, we can yak all day about that. Certanly
if the first transmission is on the ground before runup, and the next
transmission is in the air, it would be reasonable to conclude that
we are no longer talking about "the same conversation", and (as
per the original scenario) he can enter the class C upon the new
establishment of communications.


But that's not per the original scenario.

Let's say communications have been established and you're transiting Class C
airspace. The controller has spoken with several other aircraft, but hasn't
spoken with you since communications were established. At what point are
you no longer maintaining communications and thus in violation of FAR
91.130(c)(1)?


  #3  
Old March 1st 04, 02:44 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Well, if some time passes between one transmission and another, then
communications will need to be re-established.


Why?


Because if "enough" time passes, the controller will die and be replaced by a
machine.

hmmph

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #4  
Old March 1st 04, 04:31 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

Because if "enough" time passes, the controller will die and be
replaced by a machine.


Class C airspace is 20 miles in diameter at most. How much time is required
for a typical piston single to transit that distance?


  #5  
Old March 2nd 04, 12:26 AM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Class C airspace is 20 miles in diameter at most. How much time is required
for a typical piston single to transit that distance?


Four and a half hours. After that, he may run out of fuel. The pilot might be
able to hold out for six or seven, depending on tanks and power settings.

The pilot is not required to transit in a straight line. The controller is not
required to intercede if the pilot is circling inside the ring. The pilot is
not required to inform the controller (unless asked) of his routing. The
controller is not required to ask.

Pilot takes off, calls the controller and is told to remain clear. Pilot
circles the outer ring for four hours and fifteen minutes. Pilot calls again
and the controller responds with:

N1234 stand by.

Can he enter?

What if he landed and took off again sometime in those last four hours.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #6  
Old March 1st 04, 03:16 PM
Bill Denton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sounds like you guys might be running out of things to argue about, so let
me give you something new.

Steven asked: "Let's say communications have been established and you're
transiting Class C airspace. The controller has spoken with several other
aircraft, but hasn't spoken with you since communications were established.
At what point are you no longer maintaining communications and thus in
violation of FAR 91.130(c)(1)?"

Remember that the controller's initial response to the pilot's first call
is: "PODUNK1234, Standby." The key is "standby". In radio-eze this statement
means: "I am aware of your presence, stay on this frequency and monitor for
any communications from me (controller)." Note that this does not preclude
communications initiated by the pilot.

So, communications are "maintained" until they are specifically ended. Under
normal circumstances, this will involve the controller advising the pilot
that he is leaving the controller's airspace and that a frequency change is
approved. At this point communications are explicitly ended.

Don't remember where I read this, probably one of the flying magazines, so I
won't be supplying any cites.

Have fun!


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
news

"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

Well, if some time passes between one transmission and another, then
communications will need to be re-established.


Why?



How much time? Well, we can yak all day about that. Certanly
if the first transmission is on the ground before runup, and the next
transmission is in the air, it would be reasonable to conclude that
we are no longer talking about "the same conversation", and (as
per the original scenario) he can enter the class C upon the new
establishment of communications.


But that's not per the original scenario.

Let's say communications have been established and you're transiting Class

C
airspace. The controller has spoken with several other aircraft, but

hasn't
spoken with you since communications were established. At what point are
you no longer maintaining communications and thus in violation of FAR
91.130(c)(1)?




  #7  
Old March 1st 04, 04:44 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bill Denton" wrote in message
...

Sounds like you guys might be running out of things to argue about, so let
me give you something new.


There is nothing new. I'ne covered everything.



Steven asked: "Let's say communications have been established and you're
transiting Class C airspace. The controller has spoken with several other
aircraft, but hasn't spoken with you since communications were

established.
At what point are you no longer maintaining communications and thus in
violation of FAR 91.130(c)(1)?"

Remember that the controller's initial response to the pilot's first call
is: "PODUNK1234, Standby."


That's not correct. The controller's initial response to the pilot's first
call is: "N1234, remain outside Charlie airspace and standby."


  #8  
Old March 1st 04, 05:23 PM
Bill Denton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was referring to an example instance wherein the pilot is not told to
remain outside of the airspace.

The misphrasing is the result of trying to keyboard and talk on the phone at
the same time. It should be "N1234, Standby".

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Bill Denton" wrote in message
...

Sounds like you guys might be running out of things to argue about, so

let
me give you something new.


There is nothing new. I'ne covered everything.



Steven asked: "Let's say communications have been established and you're
transiting Class C airspace. The controller has spoken with several

other
aircraft, but hasn't spoken with you since communications were

established.
At what point are you no longer maintaining communications and thus in
violation of FAR 91.130(c)(1)?"

Remember that the controller's initial response to the pilot's first

call
is: "PODUNK1234, Standby."


That's not correct. The controller's initial response to the pilot's

first
call is: "N1234, remain outside Charlie airspace and standby."




  #9  
Old March 1st 04, 05:44 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bill Denton" wrote in message
...

I was referring to an example instance wherein the pilot is not told to
remain outside of the airspace.


We are not discussing the situation where communications are established and
the pilot is not told to remain outside Class C airspace.


  #10  
Old March 1st 04, 05:58 PM
Bill Denton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Perhaps you should reread the following portion of your previous post, which
was quoted in my initial post:

Let's say communications have been established and you're transiting Class C
airspace. The controller has spoken with several other aircraft, but hasn't
spoken with you since communications were established. At what point are
you no longer maintaining communications and thus in violation of FAR
91.130(c)(1)?"

So we are, in fact, discussing: "the situation where communications are
established and the pilot is not told to remain outside Class C airspace."


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net...

"Bill Denton" wrote in message
...

I was referring to an example instance wherein the pilot is not told to
remain outside of the airspace.


We are not discussing the situation where communications are established

and
the pilot is not told to remain outside Class C airspace.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! [email protected] General Aviation 0 March 26th 04 11:24 PM
Windshields - tint or clear? Roger Long Piloting 7 February 10th 04 02:41 AM
Is a BFR instruction? Roger Long Piloting 11 December 11th 03 09:58 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.