![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Everything you see, touch, use, eat, wear or live in was probably produced
by a corporation and could be produced in no other way. I'm always amused when I hear someone spew back the Democratic Party's line against "corporate interests." Mary and I are a corporation -- and we represent small business in every way. I guess that just makes us mean, old "corporate interests"... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Everything you see, touch, use, eat, wear or live in was probably produced by a corporation and could be produced in no other way. Actually major stuff came from sole proprietorship or partnership business. You see, corporations sell the finishing products. Parts within products is bought from sole proprietorship or partnerships business. So, Technically, everything you see, touch, use, eat, wear or live in most likely produced by private business. Only corporations have the power to manipulate financial system. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Toks Desalu" wrote in message news:9541c.166405$uV3.714298@attbi_s51... Everything you see, touch, use, eat, wear or live in was probably produced by a corporation and could be produced in no other way. Actually major stuff came from sole proprietorship or partnership business. You see, corporations sell the finishing products. Parts within products is bought from sole proprietorship or partnerships business. So, Technically, everything you see, touch, use, eat, wear or live in most likely produced by private business. Only corporations have the power to manipulate financial system. You have no idea what you are talking about. The Corporation I work for serves about 100 clients. In many different industries. Number of employees at each range from 3 to around 100. Of our 100 clients only 4 are Sole Props, 10 are LLC (what we here in Arkansas call partnerships and also a type of corporations) and the rest are Corporations. You are under the mistaken assumption that only really big businesses are corporations. This just proves your ignorance on the topic of the economy. GigG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are under the mistaken assumption that only really big businesses are
corporations. This just proves your ignorance on the topic of the economy. "Corporations" and "corporate interests" are code words for "rich guys" and "Republicans". It has nothing to do with reality. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:b851c.28570$PR3.506599@attbi_s03... You are under the mistaken assumption that only really big businesses are corporations. This just proves your ignorance on the topic of the economy. "Corporations" and "corporate interests" are code words for "rich guys" and "Republicans". It has nothing to do with reality. Quite. Take a good look at the Fortune 500 and see how many are "run" by Republicans. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quite. Take a good look at the Fortune 500 and see how many are "run" by
Republicans. That's because they are "productive" -- a concept that the Democratic Party should be embracing, rather than disdaining. Take this to the bank: If the Democratic Party would lose their "I'm-a-victim-and-you-owe-me" wing of their party, they would easily be able to attract a majority of Fortune 500 CEOs, if only as a reaction to the Republican Party's swing toward the Religious Right. In my opinion, the vast majority of Republicans are quite uneasy with the direction their party is going, and are ripe for the picking. As the Democrats stand today, however, few productive members of society can support them. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:4jm1c.30506$ko6.303264@attbi_s02... Quite. Take a good look at the Fortune 500 and see how many are "run" by Republicans. That's because they are "productive" -- a concept that the Democratic Party should be embracing, rather than disdaining. Actually, most Fortune 500's do not have Repub's as CEO's, particularly in the tech and comm sectors. CEO's, by and large, get where they are by politicing, and that's something Repub's don't do worth a damn. Take this to the bank: If the Democratic Party would lose their "I'm-a-victim-and-you-owe-me" wing of their party, they would easily be able to attract a majority of Fortune 500 CEOs, if only as a reaction to the Republican Party's swing toward the Religious Right. In my opinion, the vast majority of Republicans are quite uneasy with the direction their party is going, and are ripe for the picking. The Repub's constituency is in the middle class and with self-employed...the highly denigrated bourgeoisie. As the Democrats stand today, however, few productive members of society can support them. Exactly. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Honeck wrote: "Corporations" and "corporate interests" are code words for "rich guys" .... And "rich" is defined as anyone who makes twice what I do. George Patterson A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you look forward to the trip. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Jay Honeck wrote: "Corporations" and "corporate interests" are code words for "rich guys" ..... And "rich" is defined as anyone who makes twice what I do. Ahhhh...the traditional definition of _rich_ is someone who merely has a dollar more than you. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tom Sixkiller wrote: And "rich" is defined as anyone who makes twice what I do. Ahhhh...the traditional definition of _rich_ is someone who merely has a dollar more than you. Inflation. George Patterson A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you look forward to the trip. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Great shot of the Thunderbird F-16 Ejection | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 51 | February 3rd 04 10:31 PM |
Thunderbird pilot found at fault in Mountain Home AFB crash | Ditch | Military Aviation | 5 | January 27th 04 01:32 AM |
Sunday's Crash in LI Sound | Marco Leon | Piloting | 0 | November 5th 03 04:34 PM |
Thunderbird crash photos | mowkie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 21st 03 04:49 PM |
Thunderbird crash today | John Doe | Military Aviation | 12 | September 16th 03 05:56 AM |