A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Most Visible Color for Aircraft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 7th 04, 12:57 PM
Julian Scarfe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote in message
...
Howdy,

I've been looking all over, and I can't seem to find any discussions on

the
relative visibility of various colors for aircraft. I would guess that

the
best color might be different when viewed against the sky or the ground.


I think white on top (contrast vs ground clutter) and dark on the underside
(contrast vs sky) works well, like, for example, the factory Mooney schemes,
http://www.mooney.com/ .

Julian Scarfe


  #2  
Old March 7th 04, 01:02 PM
Dennis O'Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A study within the military showed that the most visible color for
identifying the shape of a plane against any background, is a solid, dark
blue...
Now, don't shoot the messenger as he has a tender hide... If you don't like
the message, do your own research...
denny
"Julian Scarfe" wrote in message
news:zZE2c.1820$re1.1377@newsfe1-win...
wrote in message
...
Howdy,

I've been looking all over, and I can't seem to find any discussions on

the
relative visibility of various colors for aircraft. I would guess that

the
best color might be different when viewed against the sky or the

ground.

I think white on top (contrast vs ground clutter) and dark on the

underside
(contrast vs sky) works well, like, for example, the factory Mooney

schemes,
http://www.mooney.com/ .

Julian Scarfe




  #3  
Old March 7th 04, 01:24 PM
Julian Scarfe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think white on top (contrast vs ground clutter) and dark on the
underside
(contrast vs sky) works well, like, for example, the factory Mooney

schemes,
http://www.mooney.com/ .


"Dennis O'Connor" wrote in message
...
A study within the military showed that the most visible color for
identifying the shape of a plane against any background, is a solid, dark
blue...
Now, don't shoot the messenger as he has a tender hide... If you don't

like
the message, do your own research...


No shots fired. :-) Do you have a reference for the study?

I remember the RAF Tornados getting painted black all over some years ago
after similar studies. Presumably they get repainted before going into
action.

I'd hesitate to paint a GA aircraft dark on top unless it was going to spend
most of its time in the shade.

Julian


  #4  
Old March 8th 04, 12:11 PM
Dennis O'Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On the reference, Julian, I simply cannot remember where I read that... I
was surfing various government and military web sites when I chanced upon
it, sometime in the past ten years if that helps...

Black planes were normallyused only for night hunters, being too visible
during the day, and that was universal among the combatants of WWII...
Remember, in those days you had to fly up on someone's tail to blast them,
so low visibility was crucial for survival at night... Much of the aircraft
in the battlefield had their paint mostly stripped off and repainted to
match their environment - and too hell with some armchair general's orders
back in the states...

Look at the picture of Yeager's, Glamorous Glennis in actual battle dress,
it is a smudged, dull, grey to match battlefield murky/smoky conditions and
prevent reflections...
In today's battlefields, the ID is made by the electronics and the missile
launched from miles away... Visibility is now an issue for air traffic
control and rescue crews, not air to air combat...
denny

"Julian Scarfe" wrote in message Do you have a
reference for the study?

I remember the RAF Tornados getting painted black all over some years ago
after similar studies.



  #5  
Old March 8th 04, 05:58 PM
Paul Sengupta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Julian Scarfe" wrote in message
news:fnF2c.1824$re1.544@newsfe1-win...
No shots fired. :-) Do you have a reference for the study?

I remember the RAF Tornados getting painted black all over some years ago
after similar studies. Presumably they get repainted before going into
action.


Most of the RAF training fleet is now black. The Tornado GR4s are
being painted black too. Tornados tended to get painted for the job
at hand. For desert camouflage during Desert Storm they were painted
in this colour:
http://www.flyingzone.co.uk/tornadoi...stormunits.htm

RAF black:
http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/hawk.html
http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/tucano.html
http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/griffin.html
http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/ssquirrel.html

I'd hesitate to paint a GA aircraft dark on top unless it was going to

spend
most of its time in the shade.


Mine seems to survive ok out in the sun. Ok, it's based near Andover
in Hampshire rather than Arizona. I've even got a black cover for it.

My plane:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?P6D3256A7

Grey was seen to be the low visibility scheme.

Paul


  #6  
Old March 7th 04, 10:25 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


A study within the military showed that the most visible color for
identifying the shape of a plane against any background, is a solid, dark
blue...


During WWII the RAF painted its photo-recce planes dark blue so they
couldn't be seen.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (requires authentication)

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #7  
Old March 8th 04, 12:01 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Cub Driver wrote:

During WWII the RAF painted its photo-recce planes dark blue so they
couldn't be seen.


First off, it's sort of an electric robin's egg blue - not very dark, and
secondly, very few of us are flying at 40,000'.

George Patterson
Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would
not yield to the tongue.
  #8  
Old March 8th 04, 10:29 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

During WWII the RAF painted its photo-recce planes dark blue so they
couldn't be seen.


First off, it's sort of an electric robin's egg blue - not very dark, and
secondly, very few of us are flying at 40,000'.


Very few Hurricanes did either.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (requires authentication)

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #9  
Old March 8th 04, 03:21 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Cub Driver wrote:

During WWII the RAF painted its photo-recce planes dark blue so they
couldn't be seen.


First off, it's sort of an electric robin's egg blue - not very dark, and
secondly, very few of us are flying at 40,000'.


Very few Hurricanes did either.


That's why they used special Spitfires for the job.

George Patterson
Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would
not yield to the tongue.
  #10  
Old March 8th 04, 06:14 PM
Paul Sengupta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...

Cub Driver wrote:
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote
First off, it's sort of an electric robin's egg blue - not very dark,

and
secondly, very few of us are flying at 40,000'.


Very few Hurricanes did either.


That's why they used special Spitfires for the job.


http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=109363
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=104095
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=145761
http://www.ospreypublishing.com/titl...P6159~ser=SPAV
http://www.littlefriends.co.uk/galle...=14&Group=7prg
http://www.ipmsstockholm.org/magazin...ail_spit19.htm

A PR squadron:
http://www.rafmarham.co.uk/organisat...pruhistory.htm

Paul


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.