![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gene Nygaard" wrote in message ... On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 17:42:25 -0000, "Julian Scarfe" wrote: "Jukka K. Korpela" wrote in message ... In practice, using hPa means being just _nominally_ metric, i.e. using actually millibars but under a different name. The odd thing is that the correct kPa would be more practical. How can you possibly suggest that it would be more "practical" to use kPa? There is an installed base of tens of thousands of altimeters in aircraft out there that are calibrated in mbar. Describing them as hPa makes it clear what the unit is for someone familiar with the SI, without risking accidents through unit confusion. The preference to use powers of 1000 is just a preference because practicality and pragmatism is sometimes more important than an arbitrary recommendation. This is a perfect example of where pragmatism should (and does) win. Oh, good grief. Does anybody use feet for altitude? Do all of the analog instruments show all the digits in those feet? An just to add to the confusion our aircraft uses pieze for manifold pressure |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 AM |
GWB and the Air Guard | JD | Military Aviation | 77 | March 17th 04 10:52 AM |
Crosswind components | James L. Freeman | Piloting | 25 | February 29th 04 01:21 AM |
RV-7a baggage area | David Smith | Home Built | 32 | December 15th 03 04:08 AM |
A-4 / A-7 Question | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 135 | October 25th 03 03:59 AM |