![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Teacherjh" wrote:
Realistially? None. [snip] Think of it this way. You are being attacked. You have a gun. What do you do with it? Shoot the attacker? (Oh, the attacker is a bacterium and it's been multplying in your system for a while now) Well put. There is no effective defense against determined terrorists who have worldwide support, short of a massive security clampdown at home affecting every phase of life. Every inhabitant of the country would have to be intimately available to the government security apparatus, perhaps via imbedded micro chips or similar technology. Border security would need a colossal budget. Anything short of that (invading other countries, putting TFRs around football stadiums, hiring more airport security, etc.), is vain political window dressing. We are in a religious war. We didn't choose it, but we've got it. These barbarians cannot be appeased, even should we be so foolish as to try. They don't want peace, they want power: they want hegemony over the entire Muslim world, including enclaves like Chechnya and Kashmir; they want the total exclusion of Western cultural influence from every Islamic country. As you said, there is no realistic, i.e. practical, way to defeat these murdering fanatics. We will keep hunting them down and killing them, but there will always be plenty of eager replacements in the pipeline. This is going to be a very ugly period in history. The spokesman claiming responsibility for the Spanish bombings said "You love life, we love death." That pretty neatly sums up the two sides in this war. In such a struggle, the side that loves life is at a tactical disadvantage. -- Dan C172RG at BFM (remove pants to reply by email) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... We are in a religious war. We didn't choose it, but we've got it. Really? Maybe we should take "separation of church and state" more seriously here and break that link. Say what you will about these people attacking us, but they are not stupid and they see the strong Christian leaning of the US government administration. Yes, I blame them for these cowardly acts, and no, I do not think they have any justification for their barbaric acts against innocents, which is against even their own religion. But let's be realistic here - anybody who doesn't see the Bush administration, with its "faith-based" initiatives and connection to the very right wing Church as crossing the line toward making the US a Christian country must be fairly blind or strongly believe that this direction is the Right Thing To Do. There are Islamist extremists who see it very much as a religious war. They twist their religion's desire for "justice" to justify their acts. But the way we respond, and the very nature of our government, affects how Muslims see us and impacts very directly on the extremist's support structure and thus whether this war winds down or grows. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, I blame them for these cowardly acts, and no, I do not think they
have any justification for their barbaric acts against innocents, which is against even their own religion. But let's be realistic here - anybody who doesn't see the Bush administration, with its "faith-based" initiatives and connection to the very right wing Church as crossing the line toward making the US a Christian country must be fairly blind or strongly believe that this direction is the Right Thing To Do. While I am uncomfortable with the religious right wing of the Republican Party, I'm hard-pressed to list anything concrete Bush has done in their favor. I suppose you could list the ban on partial-birth abortion as happening under his watch, but this procedure is so barbaric that most people -- Democrat or Republican -- shudder at this type of abortion. I see that law as being outside of partisan politics -- but that's just me, I suppose. And the Judge who tried to place the Ten Commandments on the front lawn of the town courthouse (down South somewhere -- I forget) was summarily drummed out of office... While it is true that Bush is obviously a devout Christian, which may change the *perception* of the U.S., I don't see that the country -- or the laws of the U.S. -- have changed in any pro-Christian way under his watch. If anything, the country went waaaaay conservative during the Clinton presidency. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I suppose you could list the ban on partial-birth abortion as happening under his watch, but this procedure is so barbaric that most people -- Democrat or Republican -- shudder at this type of abortion. I see that law as being outside of partisan politics -- but that's just me, I suppose. We call the terrorists barbaric for killing innocents? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suppose you could list the ban on partial-birth abortion as happening
under his watch, but this procedure is so barbaric that most people -- Democrat or Republican -- shudder at this type of abortion. I see that law as being outside of partisan politics -- but that's just me, I suppose. We call the terrorists barbaric for killing innocents? Yes. And your point is...? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:y585c.14265$po.186714@attbi_s52... I suppose you could list the ban on partial-birth abortion as happening under his watch, but this procedure is so barbaric that most people -- Democrat or Republican -- shudder at this type of abortion. I see that law as being outside of partisan politics -- but that's just me, I suppose. We call the terrorists barbaric for killing innocents? Yes. And your point is...? -- res ipsa locutor |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Gottlieb" wrote:
We are in a religious war. We didn't choose it, but we've got it. Really? Maybe we should take "separation of church and state" more seriously here and break that link. Say what you will about these people attacking us, but they are not stupid and they see the strong Christian leaning of the US government administration. We can't break that link no matter what we do, short of becoming a fundamentalist Islamic republic. I contend that Al Qaeda would not have changed a thing had Al Gore been elected. - anybody who doesn't see the Bush administration, with its "faith-based" initiatives and connection to the very right wing Church as crossing the line toward making the US a Christian country must be fairly blind In fact I do see that, but it's mostly irrelevant to our terrorism problem. There are Islamist extremists who see it very much as a religious war. They twist their religion's desire for "justice" to justify their acts. But the way we respond, and the very nature of our government, affects how Muslims see us and impacts very directly on the extremist's support structure and thus whether this war winds down or grows. I agree completely. We face the challenge of making shrewdly calculated responses against our enemies, lest we hand them cheap propaganda victories. -- Dan C172RG at BFM (remove pants to reply by email) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke wrote:
We can't break that link no matter what we do, short of becoming a fundamentalist Islamic republic. I contend that Al Qaeda would not have changed a thing had Al Gore been elected. I find it disturbing when the chief executive of our republic proposes a constitutional amendment based upon his faith. However, Dan's assertion is correct. The terrorists would be no more pleased with us were we truly nonsectarian. In fact, I suspect that we'd be considered even more of a threat to the terrorists were we to actually live up to that ideal. - Andrew |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find it disturbing when the chief executive of our republic proposes a
constitutional amendment based upon his faith. Which one is that? The marriage thing? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Peter
Gottlieb" wrote: But let's be realistic here - anybody who doesn't see the Bush administration, with its "faith-based" initiatives and connection to the very right wing Church as crossing the line toward making the US a Christian country must be fairly blind or strongly believe that this direction is the Right Thing To Do. or they don't see boogey men behind the actions of those they hate. -- Bob Noel |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|