A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Are sectional paths correct across "long" distances?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 17th 04, 01:42 PM
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
vincent p. norris wrote:

You've got to go pretty big distances before GC errors start to become
significant. For example, to go from 38N/77W to 38N/122W (roughly
Washington, DC to San Francisco, CA), the rhumbline is 270 and the GC is
284.


I thought a Great Circle is the shortest possible distance between two
points on the earth. Should that read "rhumbline is 284 and GC is
270"?

vince norris


The rhumbline is a straight line drawn on a chart (or at least that's my
intuitive definition; I'm not sure what the formal definition is). Of
course, once you get into the whole concept of representing the surface
of a sphere(oid) on a flat piece of paper, and the different chart
projections used to do it, the definition of "a straight line" becomes a
little hard to pin down. I intentionally picked two points at the same
lattitude to make the rhumbline azimuth calculation trivial.

The GC route is indeed the shortest distance between two points. Try
plugging 38N/77W to 38N/122W into

http://www.aeroplanner.com/calculators/avcalcrhumb.cfm

to get the rhumbline of 2128 nm, and into

http://www.csgnetwork.com/marinegrcircalc.html

to get the GC of 2099 nm.
  #2  
Old March 17th 04, 01:51 PM
vincent p. norris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The rhumbline is a straight line drawn on a chart (or at least that's my
intuitive definition; I'm not sure what the formal definition is).


If I'm not mistaken, a rhumb line is a line that crosses all meridians
at the same angle.

So a rhumb line is not a straight line on a sectional chart, except in
a few special cases (e.g., the equator). Notice that on the chart
Kyler posted, the meridians are closer together at the top of the
chart than at the bottom, so that straight line crosses each meridian
ast a slightly different angle.

Of course, once you get into the whole concept of representing the surface
of a sphere(oid) on a flat piece of paper, and the different chart
projections used to do it, the definition of "a straight line" becomes a
little hard to pin down.


I don't see why. A straight line is one that can be drawn using a
straightedge. As Euclid would say, it's the shortest distance between
to points on the chart. I believe one reason the Lambert chart was
invented was to make it possible to use a straightedge to draw a great
circle route.

vince norris
  #3  
Old March 18th 04, 02:12 AM
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

vincent p. norris wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, a rhumb line is a line that crosses all meridians
at the same angle.


OK, now you gone and done it. You made me go look it up. Bowditch says:

RHUMB LINE. A line on the surface of the earth making the same oblique
angle with all meridians; a loxodrome or loxodromic curve spirals toward
the poles in a constant true direction. Parallels and meridians, which
also maintain constant true directions, may be considered special cases
of the rhumb line. A rhumb line is a straight line on a Mercator
projection. Sometimes shortened to RHUMB. See also FICTITIOUS RHUMB LINE.

So, yup, you're right.

The last time I remember flying a loxodromic spiral, I was practicing
NDB approaches for my CFI-I ride :-)
  #4  
Old March 18th 04, 02:58 PM
vincent p. norris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

RHUMB LINE. A line on the surface of the earth making the same oblique
angle with all meridians; a loxodrome or loxodromic curve spirals toward
the poles in a constant true direction. Parallels and meridians, which
also maintain constant true directions, may be considered special cases
of the rhumb line. A rhumb line is a straight line on a Mercator
projection. Sometimes shortened to RHUMB. See also FICTITIOUS RHUMB LINE.

So, yup, you're right.


Thanks--and thanks for introducing me to the word "loxodromic," which
I had never heard.

And BTW, I do know how to spell "two."

The last time I remember flying a loxodromic spiral, I was practicing
NDB approaches for my CFI-I ride :-)


LOL! I know exactly what you mean!

vince norris

  #5  
Old March 20th 04, 05:04 PM
David Lesher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roy Smith writes:


The GC route is indeed the shortest distance between two points. Try
plugging 38N/77W to 38N/122W into


http://www.aeroplanner.com/calculators/avcalcrhumb.cfm


to get the rhumbline of 2128 nm, and into


http://www.csgnetwork.com/marinegrcircalc.html


to get the GC of 2099 nm.



And http://gc.kls2.com/ as it makes nice visuals.

--
A host is a host from coast to
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) Guy Alcala Military Aviation 3 August 13th 04 12:18 PM
Are sectional paths correct across "long" distances? vincent p. norris General Aviation 32 March 25th 04 02:32 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
AVIATIONTOOLBOX: how I convert sectional maps to map chunks Kyler Laird General Aviation 2 December 4th 03 01:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.