![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wdtabor" wrote:
We look at the movement of Islamofascism as the enemy, and not just individual governments. Under that view, Iraq is a legitimate strategic target. Iraq did not topple the WTC, but ...Taking Iraq first minimzes the number of Moslems we will have to kill to win this war. I find this argument illogical. Before the war, Saddam had radical Islamists, "Islamofascists," to use your word, under tighter control than in any other predominantly Muslim country - hell, he was exterminating them. Now, the lid is off: we have handed the the radicals a golden opportunity. They are already taking full advantage of it by organizing and proselytizing masses of followers, something unthinkable before the invasion. All this was foreseeable. The invasion was folly; our enemies have been much enriched by it. -- Dan C172RG at BFM (remove pants to reply by email) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|