![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wdtabor" wrote:
I tend to agree that the chances of success are not good, but the alternative is a nuclear exchange between our children and theirs that will kill millions of Americans and HUNDREDS of millions of Moslems. A chillingly believable scenario. In Pakistan we are a heartbeat away from a preview of that future. In the event of a coup there by religionists, I believe we would have no alternative but immediate attack. There can be no lasting peace with Islamofascism if they join the nuclear club. With the Soviets we faced a RATIONAL enemy with no expectation of rewards after death. Mutually assured destruction only works with people who want to succeed in this life and not the next. It is probable that the current leaders like Bin Laden and Zawahiri, whom I believe are sincere fanatics, would be replaced by cynical dictators, just as happened in Russia after the revolution. Perhaps such characters would fear MAD. The question is, would the world survive long enough to achieve that uneasy stability? So I think giving cultural change the best chance of working we can is a really good thing to do. For once, Don, I agree with you right down the line. I just think we started in the wrong place in Iraq. -- Dan C172RG at BFM (remove pants to reply by email) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|