A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Forgot to close flight plan



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 3rd 04, 05:28 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:HPqbc.69612$1I5.51059@fed1read01...

if you are IFR and complete an IFR approach to a "towered" filed,
when the tower is open, the TOWER automatically cancels your
IFR when you taxi clear of the runway


If you are IFR and complete an IFR approach to a "towered" filed, when the
tower is open, the tower does nothing with regard to your IFR when you taxi
clear of the runway.

Mr. Tomblin said he files IFR because somebody else closes the flight plan
that way. Most fields do not have control towers.


  #2  
Old April 3rd 04, 02:29 PM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "Steven P. McNicoll" said:
Mr. Tomblin said he files IFR because somebody else closes the flight plan
that way. Most fields do not have control towers.


The ones I fly IFR to almost all do. And when I'm flying into
podunk-ville, so far the approach controller giving me a phone number is
sufficient memory prod that I haven't failed to call on my cell phone
while taxing to the tie downs.


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
Nazis are part of *every* government, everywhere, in all of human
history. They're just not always called that.
-- J.D. Baldwin
  #3  
Old April 3rd 04, 03:27 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...

The ones I fly IFR to almost all do. And when I'm flying into
podunk-ville, so far the approach controller giving me a phone number is
sufficient memory prod that I haven't failed to call on my cell phone
while taxing to the tie downs.


In other words, your statement is not correct in all cases, which makes it
an incorrect statement.


  #4  
Old April 8th 04, 11:51 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


If you are IFR and complete an IFR approach to a "towered" filed, when the
tower is open, the tower does nothing with regard to your IFR when you taxi
clear of the runway.


in the US, IFR flight plans are closed automatically sometime after the flight
is completed, when the flight is completed at a towered airport when the tower
is open.

How does this happen? (real question)

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #5  
Old April 9th 04, 02:22 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

in the US, IFR flight plans are closed automatically sometime after
the flight is completed, when the flight is completed at a towered
airport when the tower is open.

How does this happen? (real question)


It happens by arriving at your destination. If you didn't arrive at your
destination a search would be initiated. Because you did arrive nothing
needs to be done.


  #6  
Old April 9th 04, 04:20 AM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


It happens by arriving at your destination. If you didn't arrive at your
destination a search would be initiated. Because you did arrive nothing
needs to be done.


By arriving... by when? I ask because until you have arrived, you haven't
arrived. Action is triggered by action, not by inaction. So, if inaction (not
arriving) is the cause, then the proximate cause must be something like a timer
going off.

It is this detail I'm looking for.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #7  
Old April 9th 04, 12:13 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

It happens by arriving at your destination. If you didn't arrive at your
destination a search would be initiated. Because you did arrive nothing
needs to be done.


By arriving... by when?


By the time forwarded to the tower.



I ask because until you have arrived, you haven't arrived.


That's deep.



Action is triggered by action, not by inaction.


Not in this case.



So, if inaction (not arriving) is the cause, then the proximate cause
must be something like a timer going off.


Why?



It is this detail I'm looking for.


There is no more detail.


  #8  
Old April 9th 04, 01:31 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


By arriving... by when?


By the time forwarded to the tower.

So, if inaction (not arriving) is the cause, then the proximate cause
must be something like a timer going off.


Why?


To give meaning to the part that says "by the time forwarded to the tower".

The tower is sent an "expect arrival at 5:34". At 5:36 the plane arrives.
What is different about the two minutes after 5:34 compared to the two minutes
before 5:34? Just that at 5:34, 5:34 happened, and that is special because it
is an expected arrival time that was not consummated.

So, at least in somebody's mind, an alarm went off at 5:34. No? Otherwise
there is nothing special about the two minutes afterwards, and no search would
be initiated.

That is, unless what you mean is that a search begins any time a handoff fails
under IFR. This is another reasonable interpretation, when "handoff" is
expanded to include "expected position report". But then, each ETA (EPRT)
would function as the "alarm" I am talking about... getting reset every time.

Is this pretty much the way it happens?

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #9  
Old April 9th 04, 06:14 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Teacherjh wrote:


The tower is sent an "expect arrival at 5:34".


It will be printed on a flight progress strip.


At 5:36 the plane arrives.
What is different about the two minutes after 5:34 compared to the two minutes
before 5:34?


None. Make it 20 minutes, still no difference.


Just that at 5:34, 5:34 happened, and that is special because it
is an expected arrival time that was not consummated.


But if you landed at 5:36, where were you at 5:34? Say about 3 miles
out? Think the tower might know that? Think the approach controller
might know that?



So, at least in somebody's mind, an alarm went off at 5:34. No?


No, no alarm went off because we knew exactly where you were.


Otherwise
there is nothing special about the two minutes afterwards, and no search would
be initiated.


Right.

That is, unless what you mean is that a search begins any time a handoff fails
under IFR.


Handoffs fail for any number of reasons. Like your cheap ass
transponder isn't sending a signal right now so I can't take the handoff
from the center because my computer won't take handoffs like that.
Modem failure. Other telephone line failure. You're too low for my
radar coverage. If the you are still in radio contact with ATC then we
don't need to go look for you. If all the electrics fail we'll do a
manual handoff. And when you land we will do exactly nothing, except
file the strip. Because nothing needs to be done. You're here and ATC
knows that.


This is another reasonable interpretation, when "handoff" is
expanded to include "expected position report".


That's not a handoff.


But then, each ETA (EPRT)
would function as the "alarm" I am talking about... getting reset every time.


If center has no radar with you they will ask for position reports.
When you fail to report he will call you on the radio. If you don't
answer he will start a search.

  #10  
Old April 9th 04, 06:15 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...
So, at least in somebody's mind, an alarm went off at 5:34. No?

Otherwise
there is nothing special about the two minutes afterwards, and no search

would
be initiated.


AFAIK, the search & rescue aspect is the same for IFR and VFR. ATC has
nothing to do with it, except that when an IFR flight arrives at a towered
airport, the controller contacts the FSS (who is the entity waiting for the
"timer to go off") to close the IFR flight plan on the pilot's behalf.

That is, unless what you mean is that a search begins any time a handoff

fails
under IFR.


AFAIK, a failed handoff doesn't *automatically* start a search. ATC may in
fact prompt a search to begin if the loss of communications is accompanied
by some other evidence that there was an accident. Otherwise, normal lost
comm procedures would prevail, which basically just mean ATC clears the
route filed and/or cleared. Thirty minutes after the filed arrival time, if
the aircraft hasn't shown up and the FSS hasn't been told to close the
flight plan, *then* search & rescue would begin.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan gwengler Instrument Flight Rules 4 August 11th 04 03:55 AM
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk Jehad Internet Military Aviation 0 February 7th 04 04:24 AM
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? Andrew Gideon Piloting 6 February 3rd 04 03:01 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.