![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dale
wrote: IMO for practice you should leave the prop in the Hi RPM position so that it provides plenty of drag. Regardless of how you simulate the engine failure you will be getting some thrust from the engine which does improve the glide performance. When the real thing happens you could be caught short if expecting the performance you experienced when practicing. Putting the prop to the Low RPM position should provide less drag in an actual engine out situation. The way I do deadstick landings is to put most of the drag out early and stay very tight to the field. My thought is I can always get rid of some drag if needed. The way I've practiced and done them real life is to leave the prop at Hi RPM. I also turn base abeam my intended landing point and put the flaps down full. I fly an extremely tight pattern to prevent coming up short. IF it appear I might be a little short I can reduce RPM on the prop and/or reduce the flap setting some (Cessna 182/206) to reduce drag. It's what I practiced and it's what has worked for me "real life". The best way to simulate an engine failure without producing thrust is to pull the mixture all the way out. When you want to bring the power back, just push the mixture back in and the engine will restart. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One caveat.. this works fine as long as the prop continues to windmill..
if it DOESNT... they you have just turned a training situation into what may be a bonafide emergency. Dave EDR wrote: In article , Dale wrote: IMO for practice you should leave the prop in the Hi RPM position so that it provides plenty of drag. Regardless of how you simulate the engine failure you will be getting some thrust from the engine which does improve the glide performance. When the real thing happens you could be caught short if expecting the performance you experienced when practicing. Putting the prop to the Low RPM position should provide less drag in an actual engine out situation. The way I do deadstick landings is to put most of the drag out early and stay very tight to the field. My thought is I can always get rid of some drag if needed. The way I've practiced and done them real life is to leave the prop at Hi RPM. I also turn base abeam my intended landing point and put the flaps down full. I fly an extremely tight pattern to prevent coming up short. IF it appear I might be a little short I can reduce RPM on the prop and/or reduce the flap setting some (Cessna 182/206) to reduce drag. It's what I practiced and it's what has worked for me "real life". The best way to simulate an engine failure without producing thrust is to pull the mixture all the way out. When you want to bring the power back, just push the mixture back in and the engine will restart. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net, Dave S wrote:
One caveat.. this works fine as long as the prop continues to windmill.. if it DOESNT... they you have just turned a training situation into what may be a bonafide emergency. I believe Highflyer has a story about that in a Taylorcraft...which lacked an electric starter, and the prop had stopped turning. Slope soaring saved the day. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PA28: Difference in constant speed prop vs fixed pitch | Nathan Young | Owning | 25 | October 10th 04 04:41 AM |
Is there a minimum prop speed? | Jim Carter | Owning | 2 | June 29th 04 01:49 AM |
Constant Speed Prop vs Variable Engine Timing | Jay | Home Built | 44 | March 3rd 04 10:08 PM |
Rotax 914 / Constant Speed? | Richard Riley | Home Built | 4 | February 26th 04 03:01 PM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |