![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With our Mooney F model at best glide speed when I pull the prop control all
the way back (max pitch), it saves me about 300 fpm while maintaining best glide. With a minimum pitch, the blades are one big braking force. "Dale" wrote in message ... In article , wrote: Whether or not the engine is "running" if the rpm is below this range, moving the prop control has no effect on the pitch of the prop. That's what I thought until I tried it on my 182. Idle power, trimmed stable 80 mph glide with the prop control all the way forward. Pulled the blue knob back and watched the airspeed increase about 5MPH...pushed the blue knob in and I slowed again. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 05:49:10 GMT, "Roy Epperson"
wrote: With our Mooney F model at best glide speed when I pull the prop control all the way back (max pitch), it saves me about 300 fpm while maintaining best glide. With a minimum pitch, the blades are one big braking force. I'll gladly take your collective word for it from in-flight observations. Mine were limited to shoving the prop ahead turning final (in every complex aircraft I've ever flown in) at approx 1200-1400 rpm (prop control previously set to 2300 in cruise) with no change in engine rpm/prop noise noted. Have pulled mis-rigged PT6A props to "flat" on short final a couple of times, have the stained shorts to prove it. Before I posted, I called my gov shop buddy to make sure his views coincided with what I remembered from hanging around in his shop. He related same, that the gov bench doesn't indicate useable gov pressure until around 1500-1600 rpm. As I recall, on most engines, the gov drive turns at about 90% of the indicated rpm. I stuff I work on now has a fixed-pitch first stage "prop", and I ain't allowed to drive it, so I can't add anything further. Regards; TC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... Mine were limited to shoving the prop ahead turning final (in every complex aircraft I've ever flown in) at approx 1200-1400 rpm (prop control previously set to 2300 in cruise) with no change in engine rpm/prop noise noted. That's a completely different situation. At that power setting, the engine didn't have enough power to drive the prop at the selected RPM (2300), and so the blades were already at flat pitch. Selecting high RPM would have had no effect, since the governor was already trying to increase RPM, to its limits (maximum flat pitch). Next time, pull the prop to *minimum* RPM and see your glide angle decrease. Have pulled mis-rigged PT6A props to "flat" on short final a couple of times, have the stained shorts to prove it. Not sure how that statement fits in to the discussion, but the PT6 governors work differently from those found on most piston-engine singles. Before I posted, I called my gov shop buddy to make sure his views coincided with what I remembered from hanging around in his shop. He related same, that the gov bench doesn't indicate useable gov pressure until around 1500-1600 rpm. You mentioned "gov pressure" in an earlier post, and I still don't understand what you mean. The force to change the prop blade angle comes from springs and oil pressure, not the governor itself. All the governor does is adjust oil valves to control how the oil moves through the pitch change mechanism. In any case, as with the others, I've had no trouble at all reducing the blade pitch even in low-RPM, idle-power situations. I have no reason to expect I'd have any trouble in an actual engine failure, assuming the engine continued to windmill and run the oil pump. Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:15:11 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote: snip Next time, pull the prop to *minimum* RPM and see your glide angle decrease. It'll likely be years, I don't do GA anymore. Have pulled mis-rigged PT6A props to "flat" on short final a couple of times, have the stained shorts to prove it. Not sure how that statement fits in to the discussion, but the PT6 governors work differently from those found on most piston-engine singles. Doesn't have anything to do with it, this is Usenet. You really owe to yourself to try it once, though. It's similiar to tromping on a non-ABS brake pedal at 40 mph. Gets your attention at 75 feet AGL with the nose down coming-over-the-fence. Before I posted, I called my gov shop buddy to make sure his views coincided with what I remembered from hanging around in his shop. He related same, that the gov bench doesn't indicate useable gov pressure until around 1500-1600 rpm. You mentioned "gov pressure" in an earlier post, and I still don't understand what you mean. The force to change the prop blade angle comes from springs and oil pressure, not the governor itself. All the governor does is adjust oil valves to control how the oil moves through the pitch change mechanism. The base of a governor is another oil pump, stepping up engine oil pressure to over 175 psi. Maximum pressure is limited by a spring-loaded pop-off valve, just like the engine oil pump. http://www.mccauley.textron.com/prop...g03govern.html was the best picture I could find of it in a 30 second Google. In any case, as with the others, I've had no trouble at all reducing the blade pitch even in low-RPM, idle-power situations. I have no reason to expect I'd have any trouble in an actual engine failure, assuming the engine continued to windmill and run the oil pump. Agreed, like I indicated in another post, the oil pump/governor doesn't care what's turning it. TC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... Not sure how that statement fits in to the discussion, but the PT6 governors work differently from those found on most piston-engine singles. Doesn't have anything to do with it, this is Usenet. Okay...just thought I'd ask. The base of a governor is another oil pump, stepping up engine oil pressure to over 175 psi. Maximum pressure is limited by a spring-loaded pop-off valve, just like the engine oil pump. Yes, but as far as I know, that pump will work just as well as the engine pump. Also, even if for some reason that pump failed, my understanding is that it would simply reduce the responsiveness of the governor. It wouldn't cause it to stop working altogether. The engine-supplied oil pressure would be sufficient. Agreed, like I indicated in another post, the oil pump/governor doesn't care what's turning it. Well, color me confused then. I thought we started this thread with you suggesting that if the engine has failed, resulting in low RPM, you wouldn't be able to get the prop to the coarse pitch setting. But, if you agree with what I said, so much the better. ![]() Pete |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ...
wrote in message ... Not sure how that statement fits in to the discussion, but the PT6 governors work differently from those found on most piston-engine singles. Doesn't have anything to do with it, this is Usenet. Okay...just thought I'd ask. Not a problem. The base of a governor is another oil pump, stepping up engine oil pressure to over 175 psi. Maximum pressure is limited by a spring-loaded pop-off valve, just like the engine oil pump. Yes, but as far as I know, that pump will work just as well as the engine pump. Also, even if for some reason that pump failed, my understanding is that it would simply reduce the responsiveness of the governor. It wouldn't cause it to stop working altogether. The engine-supplied oil pressure would be sufficient. I really would like to spend 24 hours in your world. Having spent 20+ years living in aviation, I'm still learning. IMHO it becomes quite obvious from reading your posts that airplane ownership has somehow mysteriously given you insight that mere mortals such as myself are sorely lacking. Where did you obtain the basis for this theory? I somehow doubt that you've ever had to troubleshoot/repair a prop/governor gripe. If you had, and had done your homework, you would have learned that one of the first steps in troubleshooting is verifying adequate oil pressure (also a crude method of determining adequate oil volume) to the prop governor. Please bear in mind, in a lot of engine designs, the prop governor is located at the tail end of the oil system, with a lot of built-in leaks between the engine oil pump and the governor pad. I find it rather funny that while the prop/governor will not function properly without approximately 30-40 psi to "step-up" to over 175 psi, you have determined that the governor oil pump (which initially you apparently doubted even existed) is not a necessary piece of the puzzle. Speaking from direct observation, at higher power settings, reduced/insufficient governor pressure delivered to the propeller dome can limit the ability to reduce engine rpm in a pressure-to-increase pitch system, and failure to obtain maximum rpm in a pressure-to-decrease system. Again, from direct observation, this can be caused by insufficient oil supply to the gov pad (see above), excessive rotor-to-housing clearance/physical gov oil pump damage, a fault in the oil pressure relief valve, or in extreme cases, excessive clearances/oil loss between the main crankshaft bearing and the crankshaft. Agreed, like I indicated in another post, the oil pump/governor doesn't care what's turning it. Well, color me confused then. I thought we started this thread with you suggesting that if the engine has failed, resulting in low RPM, you wouldn't be able to get the prop to the coarse pitch setting. That's entirely correct. I described my personal experiences in-flight, related that they were somewhat limited to the subject, and that I needed clarification. I also contacted two professional GA pilots, and a guy that has been repairing/overhauling prop governors for 20 years prior to posting. After reading subsequent replies, I freely admitted that I was wrong. Now I can factor that information into my personal database for future reference. Seeking new knowledge/other experiences was one of the primary reasons I climbed into the stinking swamp of GA on the internet to begin with. The other primary reason was to share my experiences and knowledge with no intention of financial gain. Over the years in these forums, my chosen profession has been repeatedly attacked, my personal experience and intent questioned. After spirited credentialled discourse with apparently clueless twits, surprisingly enuff I began to receive private communications from lurkers (and posters) who wanted me to maintain their aircraft. As this was never my intention, I had to become the anonymous self-proclaimed hairy mole on the ass that is rec.aviation. You see, I learned a long, long time ago that arguing on the Internet is like getting a gold medal in the Special Olympics. You (figure of speech, by no means a personal attack)may have "won", but you (along with all the other contestants) are still mentally-challenged. But, if you agree with what I said, so much the better. ![]() I share your joy; TC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
om... [...] Again, from direct observation, this can be caused by insufficient oil supply to the gov pad (see above), excessive rotor-to-housing clearance/physical gov oil pump damage, a fault in the oil pressure relief valve, or in extreme cases, excessive clearances/oil loss between the main crankshaft bearing and the crankshaft. Your oh-so-respectful approach to your criticism notwithstanding (full of insults and personal mischaracterizations), I think it's interesting you don't bother to list "low RPM" as a fault that could interfere with prop governing. [...] Over the years in these forums, my chosen profession has been repeatedly attacked, my personal experience and intent questioned. So, you choose to propogate the madness? IMHO, once you start doing it yourself, you lose the right to complain about others doing it to you. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PA28: Difference in constant speed prop vs fixed pitch | Nathan Young | Owning | 25 | October 10th 04 04:41 AM |
Is there a minimum prop speed? | Jim Carter | Owning | 2 | June 29th 04 01:49 AM |
Constant Speed Prop vs Variable Engine Timing | Jay | Home Built | 44 | March 3rd 04 10:08 PM |
Rotax 914 / Constant Speed? | Richard Riley | Home Built | 4 | February 26th 04 03:01 PM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |