![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... To add to this answer (about how an airplane behavs during turns), most airplanes are designed with dihedral. This means that the wings point up a little bit. If you looked at a plane from in front of the nose, the wings will form a slight V shape. This makes the "lift" that each wing produces point a little bit inward, towards the center of the plane, rather than straight up. Now, if the plane goes into a shallow bank, the wing that is lowered will become more level, and the lift will point straight up, while the wing that is raised will become more tilted, and the lift will point more towards the center of the plane. More of the lift on this "tilted" wing is "wasted" (in the sense of not holding the airplane up). So, since the other wing exerts more upwards force, it causes the plane to return to level flight. This is one of the things that makes an airplane inherently stable in flight. Separate from this, when an airplane is banked in coordinated flight and turning, the outer wing (which is the one that is raised to bank the plane to make the turn) is actually travelling faster than the inner wing. It has to, because that wing is further from the center of the turn. (to see this, imagine the plane turning so sharply that it's just about pivoting on one wingtip) The faster wing will produce more lift, and cause the airplane to bank in the direction of the turn. This is called "overbanking tendency". So, there are two opposite tendencies. Dihedral is more important with shallow banks (and gentle turns), and the overbanking tendency is more important with steeper turns and banks. Somewhere in the middle, they cancel out. Looking at the nose of the plane, we see the V-shape of the wings, the dihedral angle. Lift is always perpendicular to the wings. So in flight, the two lift vectors tilt in and "cross" over the plane itself. In level flight the horizontal components of the two lift vectors are equal and opposite. Thus, they cancel and the plane flies straight. Now, if you bank the plane so that one wing is horizontal, that wing will have no horizonal lift vector component. But, the other wing will have double. The result is a big, net horizontal force on the plane. This forces the plane to the center of the turn the way the force in a string swinging a rock keeps the rock in a circle. That's what makes a plane able to go in a circle, not the rudder. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Now, if you bank the plane so that one wing is horizontal, that wing will have no horizonal lift vector component. But, the other wing will have double. The result is a big, net horizontal force on the plane. This forces the plane to the center of the turn the way the force in a string swinging a rock keeps the rock in a circle. That's what makes a plane able to go in a circle, not the rudder. Not quite. This does not change the direction of the nose, which is essential for turning. By itself, what you post would lead to a slip. The plane would travel in a straight line, at some angle to the nose. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Teacherjh" wrote in message
... Now, if you bank the plane so that one wing is horizontal, that wing will have no horizonal lift vector component. But, the other wing will have double. The result is a big, net horizontal force on the plane. This forces the plane to the center of the turn the way the force in a string swinging a rock keeps the rock in a circle. That's what makes a plane able to go in a circle, not the rudder. Not quite. This does not change the direction of the nose, which is essential for turning. By itself, what you post would lead to a slip. The plane would travel in a straight line, at some angle to the nose. I guess this confuses me a bit. Maybe I'm tired and my brain confuses easily. Isn't it the case, in an earth-centric reference frame, that an object moving in a straight line, when subjected to a horizontal force perpendicular to that motion, will move in a circle? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
when subjected to a horizontal force perpendicular to that motion,
will move in a circle? In a sideslip, lift is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the aircaft, not the direction of motion. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Isn't it the case, in an earth-centric reference frame, that an object moving in a straight line, when subjected to a horizontal force perpendicular to that motion, will move in a circle? If the force is in fact perpendicular to the MOTION (the course) and not to the HEADING. In the case of simply banking, the nose does not move (so the heading remains the same) while the course changes (due to the force you are talking about). But so long as the nose does not change direction, the force will not change direction either and the plane will simply continue in a straight line, in a slip. (Actually, if you simply bank the plane (with alerons), the nose will tend to move in the =opposite= direction, because of the drag induced by the alerons. If your plane uses spoilers, the reverse is true) Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... Isn't it the case, in an earth-centric reference frame, that an object moving in a straight line, when subjected to a horizontal force perpendicular to that motion, will move in a circle? If the force is in fact perpendicular to the MOTION (the course) and not to the HEADING. In the case of simply banking, the nose does not move (so the heading remains the same) while the course changes (due to the force you are talking about). But so long as the nose does not change direction, the force will not change direction either and the plane will simply continue in a straight line, in a slip. I'm having a hard time wrapping my brain around this. Maybe the different reference frames are confusing me. Let's say I put the plane into a 30 degree bank with ailerons yet maintain neutral rudder. To simplify things let's say I do this instantaneously. Right at that moment, the nose is pointing in the original heading. But what happens as this fairly large (earth referenced) horizontal lift force acts on the plane; clearly it moves it sideways. But what happens to the heading, that is messing me up. If the force continues, either it results in an acceleration which causes increasing velocity or it reaches a terminal velocity where the force is balanced by drag. Does the slip result in such large drag so quickly that the net result is similar to a crosswind, or does the plane act in the medium it is flying in (of course ignoring the earth below) and have the nose indeed change heading because the plane is now "climbing" sideways? I know from experience I need a lot of *opposite* rudder to counteract a 30 degree bank and keep the nose on the same heading (as in crosswind landings). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Let's say I put the plane into a 30 degree bank with ailerons yet maintain neutral rudder. To simplify things let's say I do this instantaneously. Right at that moment, the nose is pointing in the original heading. But what happens as this fairly large (earth referenced) horizontal lift force acts on the plane; clearly it moves it sideways. But what happens to the heading, that is messing me up. The heading does not change. The force is pushing the aircraft sideways. Well, ok, the vertical tail will encounter some (sideways) resistance, causing the plane to weathervane a bit into the wind and changing the heading too, but that effect is small for small banks. If the force continues, either it results in an acceleration which causes increasing velocity or it reaches a terminal velocity where the force is balanced by drag. The latter, ultimately. And yes, the plane is then "climbing" sideways. Part of the reason for the heading change you would fight is the tail, which produces down lift, keeping the nose up against gravity. When banked, this results in a turn. But then less is available to keep the nose up, which is why you apply back pressure on the elevators. So all these things are interdependent, and become more so as the amount of bank is increased. Taken to the extreme (an aerobatics pilot might chime in here), if the wings are vertical (a knife edge) the only thing keeping the airplane up is the (once) vertical stabilizer and the fuselage. The (once) horizontal tail will want to keep the nose "up", which is sideways, and the plane will want to turn (do a loop horizontally). Ignoring other effects, of course. ![]() Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Gottlieb wrote: Let's say I put the plane into a 30 degree bank with ailerons yet maintain neutral rudder. To simplify things let's say I do this instantaneously. Right at that moment, the nose is pointing in the original heading. In my aircraft, the nose would swing in the opposite direction to the bank. The plane would continue to fly the original heading. Sideways. George Patterson This marriage is off to a shaky start. The groom just asked the band to play "Your cheatin' heart", and the bride just requested "Don't come home a'drinkin' with lovin' on your mind". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | December 2nd 04 07:00 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |