![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "darwin smith" wrote in message link.net... how much of the money spent on highway maintanance due to damage from trucks, and how much is from damage by cars? How much damage do you think a car is going to do to a highway that was built to support trucks? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How much damage do you think a car is going to do to a highway that was
built to support trucks? Actually for ALL practical purposes....heavy trucks DO ALL the damage to a properly engineered roadway.... The same is true for heavy aircraft vs little light ones on runways...I know because I worked in a runway/pavement engineering group for a few years.... Another interesting tidbid is the damage done is VERY non-linear..... A road/runway can take millions and millions of load cycles at say 90 percent of its design load, virtually an infinite number at say 50 percent or less, and somelike only a few hundred at 100 percent...and only a few at 105 percent.... So, truckers can bitch all they want about paying all those "taxes" but I guarantee you they do ALL the damage as well...(same goes for heavy airplanes)... And this brings up a few more points....if cheap/stupid politicians would just make the damn roads a smidgen thicker (and costing a smidgen more) the roads would last so long the'd generally need no repairs until it was time to tear them up because they had become outdated and need to be redesigned... And legal Folks need to be REALLY tough (as in cut your balls off and take the truck away) for overloaded trucks...because it only takes a few or even one to exceed the load limit of a road and once that road is "broken", further road cycles at MUCH less than the design limit will rapidly and continously cause further degradation... take care Blll |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BllFs6" wrote in message ... Actually for ALL practical purposes....heavy trucks DO ALL the damage to a properly engineered roadway.... The same is true for heavy aircraft vs little light ones on runways... I know because I worked in a runway/pavement engineering group for a few years.... My point exactly. The only difference with regard to the vehicle/highway versus aircraft/runway comparison is in numbers. If there were no cars we'd need far fewer multi-lane superhighways in heavily trafficked areas. We'd still need the same heavy-duty runways if general aviation did not exist. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
Pilot's Political Orientation | Chicken Bone | Owning | 314 | June 21st 04 06:10 PM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |