Letter to the Editor Response

I appreciate the feedback.

I actually submitted it to the Op-Ed feedback people, who claim that the
typical article is 650-750 words. Mine was about 900, IIRC, so I was hoping
it might still make it...

Of course, if I actually thought it would have gotten published, I would
have waited until then to post it here.

darwin smith wrote in
news
StellaStar wrote:

As a private pilot, I fly a grand total of about 150 hours per year,
in a plane that cruises approximately 135 miles per hour, covering a
grand total of about 20,000 miles per year.

I write this letter, sitting in the coach cabin of a 757 flight from
New York to Seattle, flying 180 people 2500 miles at 500 miles per
hour in about 5 hours.



Absolutely excellent letter! Packed with clear facts, logical
comparisons, reasonable arguments. Send it to a local paper or two (at
each end of your flight) and help educate some folks directly, too.

I agree that this was an excellent letter, but I will be surprised if
it is ever published in
its entirety. Space in a paper is a premium commodity, and editors are
always trying
to compress articles, columns, and the like into a minimal volume.

In an effort to maximize the effect of any "letter to the editor"
that
you write, you should
use the same techniques reporters use when they file their stories. Put
the most important
items at the start of the letter, and sprinkle the supporting
information throughout. Your
goal should be to have your letter written so that if the editor
deletes all but the first 25%,
you've still made your point.

Rich Lemert

"Judah" wrote in message
...
I appreciate the feedback.

I actually submitted it to the Op-Ed feedback people, who claim that the
typical article is 650-750 words. Mine was about 900, IIRC, so I was
hoping
it might still make it...

Of course, if I actually thought it would have gotten published, I would
have waited until then to post it here.

350 words max it save masses of time as they dont have to edit it and ruin
the points you are making.

It is better to be brutal with your own work and any point you think is
weak, take out. Carry on doing this till you have a very pithy and easy to
read piece. Too many stats will have most readers turning to the next
article by the third statistic.