A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pilot's Political Orientation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 19th 04, 09:42 PM
Michael 182
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dan,

Look up Tarver on Google. He is a long time troll who never bothers to back
up any of his arguments except with rambling non-sensical "statements of
fact". Give it up.

Michael


"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:
Another lie.


I have science on my side


Another lie.

and no reason to lie.


Then apparently it's just your nature.

Try posting there again. If what you just said is the truth,
you should get little or no response.


I cross post to talk.origins every few months. It
is a kook bin full of retards spewing 150 year old
dog breeder science and an ocasional qualified
biologist. The biologist usually admits that there are
big problems with Darwin's "Origin of Species",
but "it demonstrates how one thing might
replace another". Although demonstrating a
concept has value, theaching religion as science is
not the way to do it.


More lies. You're afraid.




  #2  
Old April 19th 04, 10:07 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael 182" wrote in message
news:uQWgc.161786$gA5.1908220@attbi_s03...
"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:
Another lie.

I have science on my side


Another lie.

and no reason to lie.


Then apparently it's just your nature.

Try posting there again. If what you just said is the truth,
you should get little or no response.

I cross post to talk.origins every few months. It
is a kook bin full of retards spewing 150 year old
dog breeder science and an ocasional qualified
biologist. The biologist usually admits that there are
big problems with Darwin's "Origin of Species",
but "it demonstrates how one thing might
replace another". Although demonstrating a
concept has value, theaching religion as science is
not the way to do it.


More lies. You're afraid.

Dan,

Look up Tarver on Google.


You will find an archive troll which has been largely ineffective. There
was a second archive troll, but the paradox in that one has been revealed.

He is a long time troll who never bothers to back
up any of his arguments except with rambling non-sensical "statements of
fact". Give it up.


I have provided Dan with enough information to do his own google search. It
doesn't really matter to me whether Dan has an interest in the scientific
truth of the matter, or not. Jay Gould spent a number of years trying to
reconcile the hard physical Geological evidence through a notional
hypothesis similar to Darwin's, except Gould's rapid evolution might have
happened; while Darwin's evolution into a new species slowly over a long
period of time is false.


  #3  
Old April 21st 04, 03:26 AM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Michael 182" wrote in message
news:uQWgc.161786$gA5.1908220@attbi_s03...
"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:
Another lie.

I have science on my side

Another lie.

and no reason to lie.

Then apparently it's just your nature.

Try posting there again. If what you just said is the truth,
you should get little or no response.

I cross post to talk.origins every few months. It
is a kook bin full of retards spewing 150 year old
dog breeder science and an ocasional qualified
biologist. The biologist usually admits that there are
big problems with Darwin's "Origin of Species",
but "it demonstrates how one thing might
replace another". Although demonstrating a
concept has value, theaching religion as science is
not the way to do it.

More lies. You're afraid.

Dan,

Look up Tarver on Google.


You will find an archive troll which has been largely ineffective. There
was a second archive troll, but the paradox in that one has been revealed.


ineffective in what? archiving your crap. on one needs to show you
for the prick you are. you do a stand up job of that yourself.
  #4  
Old April 20th 04, 12:41 AM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael 182" wrote:
Dan,

Look up Tarver on Google. He is a long time troll who never:
bothers to back up any of his arguments except with rambling
non-sensical "statements of fact".


I know, I know. Hell, *everyone* knows Tarver is the dizziest loon on
usenet.

Give it up.


I guess I'll have to; he's gun-shy now. I sure did want to see him get
shredded on talk.origins again, though; it's pure entertainment.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM


  #5  
Old April 20th 04, 12:51 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

I guess I'll have to; he's gun-shy now. I sure did want to see him get
shredded on talk.origins again, though; it's pure entertainment.


I told you all you have to do is make a crosspost. I wouldn't post to a
Mormon newsgroup eiither. I enjoy mopping the floor with the uneducated
crew that hangs out at talk.origins. It upsets the biologists to see you
make such a fool of yourself though and I do not want to run off the
competent.


  #6  
Old April 21st 04, 03:25 AM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Michael 182" wrote in message news:uQWgc.161786$gA5.1908220@attbi_s03...
Dan,

Look up Tarver on Google. He is a long time troll who never bothers to back
up any of his arguments except with rambling non-sensical "statements of
fact". Give it up.

Michael



nah he's not a troll, he believes his utter garbage.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Dover short pilots since vaccine order Roman Bystrianyk Naval Aviation 0 December 29th 04 12:47 AM
Pilot's Political Orientation Chicken Bone Owning 314 June 21st 04 06:10 PM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! General Aviation 3 December 23rd 03 08:53 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.