![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
... Instrument meteorological conditions (IMC)
prevailed at the time and an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan was filed... ... the private-rated pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. Private-rated pilot flying IFR in IMC? How does this work? Can/should an IFR student do this? -harry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry M." wrote in message ... ... Instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) prevailed at the time and an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan was filed... ... the private-rated pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. Private-rated pilot flying IFR in IMC? How does this work? Can/should an IFR student do this? No, not supposed to. But the report may be wrong and he might have the instrument rating. I paid more attention to the part about him not trying the alternate static source and about the water between the alternate source valve and the primary static source. From the report it sounded like he got sufficiently flustered that, regardless of the cause or possible trivial remedy, the chute was his best option. If this is the case then I would question his training and currency. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message et... No, not supposed to. But the report may be wrong and he might have the instrument rating. I paid more attention to the part about him not trying "Private rated" in this context means he has a private certificate rather than a commercial or ATP certificate. It does not refer to whether he is IFR-rated. If he were not IFR rated then almost for sure this would have been specifically mentioned by the NTSB and included as part of the probable cause. -------------------- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Kaplan" wrote in message
s.com... If he were not IFR rated then almost for sure this would have been specifically mentioned by the NTSB and included as part of the probable cause. They don't include probable causes in preliminary reports. This is just a statement of facts. A probable cause will come out in a year or two . . . Or perhaps tomorrow on this one since the probable cause kinda smacks you upside the face. -- Jim Fisher |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry M." wrote: Private-rated pilot flying IFR in IMC? How does this work? Can/should an IFR student do this? The reporter obviously meant that the pilot has a private pilot's certificate. I would assume that he also has an instrument rating, since he filed an instrument flight plan. Personally, I think a student pursuing an instrument rating should get some time with an instructor in real IMC, but not solo. George Patterson If you don't tell lies, you never have to remember what you said. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry M." wrote in message ... ... Instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) prevailed at the time and an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan was filed... ... the private-rated pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. Private-rated pilot flying IFR in IMC? How does this work? Can/should an IFR student do this? -harry A private pilot with an instrument rating is still a private pilot. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. | C J Campbell | Piloting | 122 | May 10th 04 11:30 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
Report: Sedatives found in pilot's blood | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 15th 03 11:55 PM |
Senator asks Navy for report on pilot | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | July 17th 03 10:08 PM |