![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That would be true, but that would be for ONE year. That is why you need
over a million flight hours before the numbers mean much. Had this sort of thing been what was driving the numbers it would be obvious wouldn't it. They have a big enough fleet now, so this argument isn't winning me over like it did in the beginning. Also, the training they are doing seems to be helping. However, if you believe that the numbers are too small to be valuable, then perhaps we don't know if the training is helping at all do we? Also, its not the number of fatalaties that worries me as much as the number of accidents that result in a fatality. In fact, a valuable number that I have not seen studied would be the ration of survivors for all souls on board for all accidents. That would tell you a lot about the crash worthiness of the design. Except for people that don't believe in statistics. "David Megginson" wrote in message news ![]() Dude wrote: My only agenda is safety, and frankly, Cirrus has a poor rating. That's a tricky conclusion to draw from so little data. After all, if two Cirrus planes have a midair, they might double the Cirrus fatal-accident rate for that year. The Cirrus is a new design, and any new technology is risky until people acquire the experience to use it safely (look at the crashes and midair breakups with the earliest jetliners). Unfortunately, there will have to be many more crashes before people are able to spot the statistically-significant patterns (assuming that any exist) and put out SB's and AD's, design new training methods, etc. All the best, David (a Piper owner, with no axe to grind either way) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In fact, a valuable number that I have not seen studied would be the ration of survivors for all souls on board for all accidents. That would tell you a lot about the crash worthiness of the design. Not really, the parachute is sort of separate, even though it's part of the procedure and the aircraft. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Advice and experts with 400 series Cessnas (414 and 421), purchase and training | [email protected] | Owning | 36 | January 9th 05 02:32 AM |
Air Shares Elite and Cirrus Sr22 | Teranews \(Daily\) | Owning | 4 | September 5th 04 05:28 PM |
Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. | Dennis | Owning | 170 | May 19th 04 04:44 PM |
New Cirrus SR22 Lead Time | Lenny Sawyer | Owning | 4 | March 6th 04 09:22 AM |
Fractional Ownership - Cirrus SR22 | Rich Raine | Owning | 3 | December 24th 03 05:36 AM |