![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas J. Paladino Jr." wrote in message .. . http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4970837/ Exciting stuff! Rutan's SpaceShipOne hit 200,000 feet today over their Mojave test site. That last third of the flight is going to be tough. It took 55% fuel just to reach 211,000 feet. Most of the remainder will be needed just to carry a full load of fuel that high. Plus, there was only one person on board. To get the X Prize, they have to carry three people. Not only that, they have been managing only one Spaceship One flight every couple of months (lately about one a month). They have made only three powered flights. What do they need for the X Prize -- something like one every two weeks, isn't it? It may take a little while for them to get it all together, but they do appear to be a lot closer. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell wrote:
That last third of the flight is going to be tough. I'm sure the first two thirds will be pretty tough as well. It took 55% fuel just to reach 211,000 feet. Most of the remainder will be needed just to carry a full load of fuel that high. Plus, there was only one person on board. To get the X Prize, they have to carry three people. Don't worry about their mileage Mr. Cambell, I'm sure Burt Rutan has a better idea of the fuel requirements than you do. Not only that, Gaaaaasssssssp....... You have more comments. they have been managing only one Spaceship One flight every couple of months (lately about one a month). So what. Will NASA be able to match that this year They have made only three powered flights. So what...... That's three more than you will ever make now isn't it. What do they need for the X Prize -- something like one every two weeks, isn't it? Beats me but I'll bet that Burt Rutan has a much better handle on what the requirements are than you do..... So don't sweat the little details that you will personally never have to be responsible for. It may take a little while for them to get it all together, but they do appear to be a lot closer. How condescendingly generous you are. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Shiver Me Timbers" wrote in message ... C J Campbell wrote: That last third of the flight is going to be tough. How condescendingly generous you are. Somebody step on your tail? It really is going to be tough. If Rutan were attempting something easy, it wouldn't be worth all that attention, would it? What, are you trying to belittle his accomplishments or what he is trying to do? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Somebody step on your tail? It really is going to be tough. If Rutan were attempting something easy, it wouldn't be worth all that attention, would it? What, are you trying to belittle his accomplishments or what he is trying to do? Just what is the point of the whole X-Prize competition anyway? I understand the requirements, but why do it all? The Rutan Voyager flight wasn't particularly useful either, but it was something that hadn't been done before. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Somebody step on your tail? It really is going to be tough. If Rutan were attempting something easy, it wouldn't be worth all that attention, would it? What, are you trying to belittle his accomplishments or what he is trying to do? Just what is the point of the whole X-Prize competition anyway? I understand the requirements, but why do it all? The Rutan Voyager flight wasn't particularly useful either, but it was something that hadn't been done before. Someone might have said the same thing to the Wrights. The idea is to prove that privately financed space travel is both feasible and reasonable. No government has managed to do what Rutan and the others are attempting. The prize has the additional advantage of attracting media attention so that, once it has been won, public interest in space tourism will be generated. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Someone might have said the same thing to the Wrights. Where's the similarity? The Wrights were the first to achieve powered, sustained, controlled heavier-than-air flight. Nobody had accomplished that before the Wrights on December 17, 1903. But manned suborbital flight HAS been accomplished before, four times before, and it was last done over forty years ago. If manned suborbital spaceflight had any real usefulness why did it stop? The idea is to prove that privately financed space travel is both feasible and reasonable. No government has managed to do what Rutan and the others are attempting. The prize has the additional advantage of attracting media attention so that, once it has been won, public interest in space tourism will be generated. So the ultimate goal is passenger hops as a commercial venture? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Someone might have said the same thing to the Wrights. Where's the similarity? The Wrights were the first to achieve powered, sustained, controlled heavier-than-air flight. Nobody had accomplished that before the Wrights on December 17, 1903. But manned suborbital flight HAS been accomplished before, four times before, and it was last done over forty years ago. If manned suborbital spaceflight had any real usefulness why did it stop? The earlier flights were not done in a re-usable spacecraft. The idea is to prove that privately financed space travel is both feasible and reasonable. No government has managed to do what Rutan and the others are attempting. The prize has the additional advantage of attracting media attention so that, once it has been won, public interest in space tourism will be generated. So the ultimate goal is passenger hops as a commercial venture? Yes. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Where's the similarity?
It opens doors - doors that people didn't even think were there. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 May 2004 14:31:20 +0000, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Someone might have said the same thing to the Wrights. Where's the similarity? The Wrights were the first to achieve powered, sustained, controlled heavier-than-air flight. Nobody had accomplished that before the Wrights on December 17, 1903. But manned suborbital flight HAS been accomplished before, four times before, and it was last done over forty years ago. If manned suborbital spaceflight had any real usefulness why did it stop? Actually, I believe they were the first to achieve powered, sustained, controlled, heavier-than-air-flight, which was properly documented and recorded. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: Just what is the point of the whole X-Prize competition anyway? I understand the requirements, but why do it all? What was the point of the first civilian flight across the Atlantic? George Patterson I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rutan hits 200k feet! Almost there! | Thomas J. Paladino Jr. | Military Aviation | 150 | May 22nd 04 07:20 PM |
Spaceship 1 hits 212,000 feet!!!!!! | BlakeleyTB | Home Built | 10 | May 20th 04 10:12 PM |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) | Peter Stickney | Military Aviation | 45 | February 11th 04 04:46 AM |