![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G. Burkhart" wrote: Thanks, George, for the detailed information on this. One question I have; what is the fuel burn difference between the models/years? Clarke doesn't have fuel burn figures, but consumption is usually about 0.055 gallons per horsepower. George Patterson I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 May 2004 23:11:53 GMT, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote: "G. Burkhart" wrote: Thanks, George, for the detailed information on this. One question I have; what is the fuel burn difference between the models/years? Clarke doesn't have fuel burn figures, but consumption is usually about 0.055 gallons per horsepower. The old PA28-180, Hershey bar wing Cherokee 180 burns between 8 and 10 GPH, depending on how hard you push it. It may have been physiological, but it seemed like the difference between the 180s and the er... lesser models was like night and day. You can tell I prefer the 180:-)) It was a great short field plane and to me all of the Cherokees ride the bumps much better than the Cessnas of the same size. George Patterson I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in. They're worse 'n ants. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It may have been physiological, but it seemed like the difference
between the 180s and the er... lesser models was like night and day. You can tell I prefer the 180:-)) The only immutable thing I've learned from airplane ownership is this: There is no substitute for horsepower. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article Fpmpc.53004$xw3.3200075@attbi_s04, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: It may have been physiological, but it seemed like the difference between the 180s and the er... lesser models was like night and day. You can tell I prefer the 180:-)) The only immutable thing I've learned from airplane ownership is this: There is no substitute for horsepower. even more important: aerodynamics (compare the twin Comanche to the Apache). and, of course, money -- Bob Noel |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article Fpmpc.53004$xw3.3200075@attbi_s04, Jay Honeck
wrote: It may have been physiological, but it seemed like the difference between the 180s and the er... lesser models was like night and day. You can tell I prefer the 180:-)) The only immutable thing I've learned from airplane ownership is this: There is no substitute for horsepower. .... and horsepower = $$$ And we all know there is no substitute for more $$$! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High wing to low wing converts...or, visa versa? | Jack Allison | Owning | 99 | January 27th 05 11:10 AM |
High wing vs low wing | temp | Owning | 11 | June 10th 04 02:36 AM |
High Wing or Low Wing | Bob Babcock | Home Built | 17 | January 23rd 04 01:34 AM |
End of High wing low wing search for me | dan | Home Built | 7 | January 11th 04 10:57 AM |
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | September 29th 03 03:40 PM |