![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the stabilator on the Aztec is the same as that on the Cherokee, the
antiservo tab isn't the sole thing driving the stabilator, although it looks like it. If you take the top half of the tail cone off, you can see a large tubular rod extending forward into the tail from the main pivot for the stabilator. I'm told that this has a counterweight on the end inside the tail, and that the main control (don't know if it's a rod or cables) from the yokes attach to this. The only cables going to the trim jackscrew are the ones from the trim control between the seats. If the trim jackscrew stripped out, you would not lose the ability to move the stabilator with the yoke, but you might lose all antiservo action of the tab, depending on the failure mode. This may or may not be a complete disaster. The reason there is antiservo action is so that the forces on the stabilator don't result in positive feedback as you move the stabilator away from the neutral position. Since the center of pressure moves with AOA, without the antiservo action the normal aerodynamic action would be to push the stabilator farther from neutral the farther you move it, the opposite of what you want. At least that's the way I understand it. Can you fly with it like that? Don't know. Don't want to find out. We're rapidly reaching the conclusion that we should get it sooner rather than later. -- Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways) I don't have to like Bush and Cheney (Or Kerry, for that matter) to love America "pacplyer" wrote in message om... Bob, I'm kinda worried about this. On my snub-nose Aztec the stabilator has a similar "antiservo" surface that "drives" the entire stabilator. By pulling on the yoke you are first moving that tab which in result "flys" the entire tail to a new pitch command position. Loss of control of that tab suface (i.e. trim jackscrew unexpectedly strips) at least on my bird, will not just loose trim, but could, if it shears past the limit, loose all longitudinal pitch control. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Chilcoat wrote...
If the stabilator on the Aztec is the same as that on the Cherokee, the antiservo tab isn't the sole thing driving the stabilator... What Packy described is a servo tab, not an anti-servo tab. A servo tab coming loose will definitely cause loss of control. An anti-servo tab coming loose isn't *necessarily* as catastrophic but I wouldn't push it just the same. Free-floating surfaces that *can* backdrive the control surface aren't a good thing. Dave 'aeroservoelastic' Hyde |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"nauga" wrote in message nk.net...
Bob Chilcoat wrote... If the stabilator on the Aztec is the same as that on the Cherokee, the antiservo tab isn't the sole thing driving the stabilator... What Packy described is a servo tab, not an anti-servo tab. A servo tab coming loose will definitely cause loss of control. An anti-servo tab coming loose isn't *necessarily* as catastrophic but I wouldn't push it just the same. Free-floating surfaces that *can* backdrive the control surface aren't a good thing. Dave 'aeroservoelastic' Hyde Dave 'aeroservoelastic' Hyde is correct. It's a servo tab on my plane not an anti-servo like Bobs. Thanks for the correction. For some reason it didn't occur to me that the Archer has the same system that is on the Warrior. Is that right? So then Bob's system and my system are markedly different. I last instructed in the Warrior in 83'. You'd think I could remember these things. If the trim jackscrew cleans off all the threads kinda like on alaska airlines, you may still have some elevator authority on the archer, that's true. But how stable is it going to be as you slow down for approach and put out flaps? Is it going to slam back and forth against the trim limit positions? Will the trim limit stops hold? The Alaska guys kept dicking with it trying to simulate the trim needed for an approach when it let go. After that accident most of us resolved to not try and free up a jammed stab as procedure dictates. Just head for a lakebed and land flaps up. On the point about the second control tube that comes off the counter balance side, on my airplane this turns into a cable run. But for sure, if my servo tab bolt fell out, my airplane would just turn into a pointed tool box. So you mothers stay away from it, understand? Interesting conversation Bob. pac these are all just my hazy opinons only |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"pacplyer" wrote in message The Alaska guys kept
dicking with it trying to simulate the trim needed for an approach when it let go. So you mothers stay away from it, understand? On my first Azwreck, a C model, I had a runaway trim. I ran the electric for some nose up trim while advancing the power during the take-off roll. I didn't notice that the trim kept running. It ran to the stop and jammed. She rotated much earlier than normal. Turning the overhead crank didn't do anything. It took a lot of muscle but I flew it 20 miles to the next airport (the departure airport being amongst the top ten busiest GA airports). Some pattern nazi started in on my for not using the radio while landing cross-wise to everyone else. After getting the plane on the ground, I went off on him in way that would have made Uncle Bob proud. D. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt.Doug" wrote: Some pattern nazi started in on my for not using the radio while landing cross-wise to everyone else. After getting the plane on the ground, I went off on him in way that would have made Uncle Bob proud. D. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Geez, Capt Doug, kudos to you. You make these tired old eyes moist and put a big lump in my throat. Thanks, Unla' BOb |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt.Doug" wrote in message ...
"pacplyer" wrote in message The Alaska guys kept dicking with it trying to simulate the trim needed for an approach when it let go. So you mothers stay away from it, understand? On my first Azwreck, a C model, I had a runaway trim. I ran the electric for some nose up trim while advancing the power during the take-off roll. I didn't notice that the trim kept running. It ran to the stop and jammed. She rotated much earlier than normal. Turning the overhead crank didn't do anything. It took a lot of muscle but I flew it 20 miles to the next airport (the departure airport being amongst the top ten busiest GA airports). Some pattern nazi started in on my for not using the radio while landing cross-wise to everyone else. After getting the plane on the ground, I went off on him in way that would have made Uncle Bob proud. D. Wow, you must not of had any fat chicks in the back. Interesting to know big tricepts can override full up trim. Different cause, but that's what killed those guys in the diesel-8 as I recall. They gave the S/O a t/o and when he rotated he held on kinda tight and ran the stab to full nose up. (not a runaway trim, just a runaway plumber thumb.) The last thing on the voice recorder was the captain repeatedly yelling for him to "push forward!" Apparently the captain didn't notice the trim running. (it was orig quiet, I think) The tail was so huge on that thing and its a different type (THS) that full down elevator couldn't overcome the stab position. What's with your MD's crooked elevators anyway? Everytime the winds blowing it scares us guys with normal tail feathers. ;-) pac |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"pacplyer" wrote in message What's with your MD's crooked elevators
anyway? Everytime the winds blowing it scares us guys with normal tail feathers. ;-) Ye of little faith.... The elevators float up and down freely and independently of each other. We have no control over that. Direct your attention to the inboard tabs on the elevators for the truth. The tabs are cable operated (the 'dc' in DC-9 stands for 'direct cable'). We can lose all hydraulics and electrical without affecting the primary flight controls. No Sioux City for us! D. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt.Doug" wrote in message ...
"pacplyer" wrote in message What's with your MD's crooked elevators anyway? Everytime the winds blowing it scares us guys with normal tail feathers. ;-) Ye of little faith.... The elevators float up and down freely and independently of each other. We have no control over that. Direct your attention to the inboard tabs on the elevators for the truth. The tabs are cable operated (the 'dc' in DC-9 stands for 'direct cable'). We can lose all hydraulics and electrical without affecting the primary flight controls. No Sioux City for us! D. Yeah, well on mine the 'dc' stands for 'deathcruiser.' My Skydrol worshipping pilots always keep a little statuette of the god Hydralis in their trowser pocket. Legend has it that this ancient custom has also been linked to hopes of good fertility on layovers (only way to keep the gene-line going since the cargo doors and engines always blow up.) pac |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 05:27:35 GMT, "Capt.Doug"
wrote: "pacplyer" wrote in message What's with your MD's crooked elevators anyway? Everytime the winds blowing it scares us guys with normal tail feathers. ;-) Ye of little faith.... The elevators float up and down freely and independently of each other. We have no control over that. Direct your attention to the inboard tabs on the elevators for the truth. The tabs are cable operated (the 'dc' in DC-9 stands for 'direct cable'). We can lose all hydraulics and electrical without affecting the primary flight controls. No Sioux City for us! D. The one and only Douglas Commercial-1 prototype put up to TWA to counter Boeing's 247, was not exactly responsive to TWA's spec for a 3-engine plane. But the DC-1 did lead to 20 orders for the DC-2 Brian W |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:47:43 -0400, "Bob Chilcoat"
wrote: If the stabilator on the Aztec is the same as that on the Cherokee, the antiservo tab isn't the sole thing driving the stabilator, although it looks like it. If you take the top half of the tail cone off, you can see a large tubular rod extending forward into the tail from the main pivot for the stabilator. I'm told that this has a counterweight on the end inside the tail, and that the main control (don't know if it's a rod or cables) from the yokes attach to this. The only cables going to the trim jackscrew are the ones from the trim control between the seats. If the trim jackscrew stripped out, you would not lose the ability to move the stabilator with the yoke, but you might lose all antiservo action of the tab, depending on the failure mode. This may or may not be a complete disaster. The reason there is antiservo action is so that the forces on the stabilator don't result in positive feedback as you move the stabilator away from the neutral position. Since the center of pressure moves with AOA, without the antiservo action the normal aerodynamic action would be to push the stabilator farther from neutral the farther you move it, the opposite of what you want. At least that's the way I understand it. Can you fly with it like that? Don't know. Don't want to find out. We're rapidly reaching the conclusion that we should get it sooner rather than later. I have pulled one of these apart to replace the bobbin. your description is exactly correct. btw when you replace the bobbin, if the trim indicator doesnt seem to be in exactly the old positions you have come to know when you reassemble it all, then old son you have done what we did and put it in upside down. it is almost totally symetrical and the only indication that it is in upside down is that the trim indicator sits out of position. the counterweight is a large lump of cast iron. amazing to think that the entire tailplane is held to the fuselage by two AN3 hinge bolts isnt it :-) Stealth Pilot |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|