Where can I find aircraft videos....

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:zhqpc.53731$z06.7593371@attbi_s01...
Jay, I am flying up to a private strip that is within the newly invented
Missouri Breaks National Monument. The owner wants to sell his land I
think
and the Montana Pilots Assoc is going up this morning to meet with the
guy
and see what our options are for keeping the strip open forever. I'll
have
the video camera with me to film the landing and takeoff. You can have
a
copy after I convert it to a DVD format if you want. I think 30 seconds
of
MPEG II is about 3 MB, so that should email OK.

Sure -- send it along.

Poor Jav may have to buy a bigger server if we keep uploading these files!



I took a bunch of video today. The video of the place I told you about is
2:50 and is 87 MB in the MPEG II format. I'll have to reduce the video to
short final to make it emailable. I'll try MPEG I and see what that does.

"Newps" wrote in message
...
2:50 and is 87 MB in the MPEG II format. I'll have to reduce the video to
short final to make it emailable. I'll try MPEG I and see what that does.

Download free MS Windows Media Encoder, it does a great job and has widest
support

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/win...r/default.aspx

If you want highest quality, yet manageable size, then Quicktime Pro does a
great job at MPEG-4, but less popular install base and isn't free:

http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/

HECTOP
PP-ASEL-IA
http://www.maxho.com
maxho_at_maxho.com

On Sat, 15 May 2004 21:49:39 -0400, HECTOP wrote:

"Newps" wrote in message
...
2:50 and is 87 MB in the MPEG II format. I'll have to reduce the video to
short final to make it emailable. I'll try MPEG I and see what that does.

Download free MS Windows Media Encoder, it does a great job and has widest
support

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/win...r/default.aspx


yes, but it can hardly be viewed with Linux or MAC.

If you want highest quality, yet manageable size, then Quicktime Pro does a
great job at MPEG-4, but less popular install base and isn't free:

http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/

therefore it installs cleaner on the system.

#m

--
If John and Peter get together and take money from Paul at gunpoint,
we call it armed robbery. If two thousand voters get together
and decide to take money from another thousand, we call it taxation.
C J Campbell in rec.aviation.piloting

"Martin Hotze" wrote in message
...




http://www.microsoft.com/windows/win...r/default.aspx


yes, but it can hardly be viewed with Linux or MAC.

I couldn't possibly care less about Linux or Mac, you buy that crap you get
what you deserve.

"Newps" wrote in message
...
I couldn't possibly care less about Linux or Mac, you buy that crap you
get
what you deserve.

Martin!!! Maaaaartiiiin!!! Can you please flame this guy for me?

Thank you

HECTOP
PP-ASEL-IA
http://www.maxho.com
maxho_at_maxho.com

On Sun, 16 May 2004 11:35:57 -0400, HECTOP wrote:

I couldn't possibly care less about Linux or Mac, you buy that crap you
get
what you deserve.

Martin!!! Maaaaartiiiin!!! Can you please flame this guy for me?

why?
because of this?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2120

Thank you

but I'll try.

#m

--
If John and Peter get together and take money from Paul at gunpoint,
we call it armed robbery. If two thousand voters get together
and decide to take money from another thousand, we call it taxation.
C J Campbell in rec.aviation.piloting

"Martin Hotze" wrote in message
...
because of this?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2120

I am a Linux admin and an "evangelist" since 1995, that makes it 9 years
running now, managed thousands of Linux servers by now, including my own
public shell boxen with over 600 nimrods living in it (do you know what it's
like?), and you know what? I fsckin' hate Linux on a desktop, complete with
all the clumsy user-hostile GUI's like Gnome or KDE, and all the stupid
barely functional office implementations like KOffice, OpenOffice and other
pretentious garbage. Linux has no place on a desktop, it is not meant as a
"user-friendly" OS, it is a server platform, great one at that, and desktop
should be left to Microsoft because it's what they do best, and they should
stay the F out of the server market.

Just my humble five cents :-)

HECTOP
PP-ASEL-IA
http://www.maxho.com
maxho_at_maxho.com

"Newps" wrote in message
...

"Martin Hotze" wrote in message
...





http://www.microsoft.com/windows/win...r/default.aspx


yes, but it can hardly be viewed with Linux or MAC.

I couldn't possibly care less about Linux or Mac, you buy that crap you
get
what you deserve.

I would have said the same thing about MiCrashSoft. :~)

On Sun, 16 May 2004 09:07:33 -0600, Newps wrote:

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/win...r/default.aspx


yes, but it can hardly be viewed with Linux or MAC.

I couldn't possibly care less about Linux or Mac, you buy that crap you get
what you deserve.

not wanting to start an OS flame war, but monocultures are bad. everywhere.
It is a matter of letting other people their choice and not TAKING NO CARE
as you put it in not so fine words. This is a "either you are with us"
choice you let to other people.
If you are a good site developer you want to please everybody and not just
the majority. Yes, it takes more time and effort to also please the other
5% than it took to please the first 95%, but it is worth the effort.

#m

--
If John and Peter get together and take money from Paul at gunpoint,
we call it armed robbery. If two thousand voters get together
and decide to take money from another thousand, we call it taxation.
C J Campbell in rec.aviation.piloting

"Martin Hotze" wrote in message
...

not wanting to start an OS flame war, but monocultures are bad.
everywhere.
It is a matter of letting other people their choice and not TAKING NO CARE
as you put it in not so fine words. This is a "either you are with us"
choice you let to other people.

Can't decode this.


If you are a good site developer

I am not a site developer. I put my own and other friends videos onto DVD
or VCD, although I may redo my personal website again for friends and
family.


you want to please everybody

Not even remotely interested.


Yes, it takes more time and effort to also please the other
5% than it took to please the first 95%, but it is worth the effort.


I doubt it.