A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The price of gas



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 23rd 04, 05:24 PM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:Z91sc.99636$xw3.5914852@attbi_s04...
Check out how much it costs to get past the EPA and the rest fo the
government alphabet soup to build refining capacity, to drill, or other
facilities.


You can extend that statement to EVERYTHING nowadays.

You should see the cost of all the various EPA reports just for our

airport
to extend a friggin' runway by a 1000 feet. It's incredible.


You should see the OSHA crap we run through. Our friggin' insurance company
got our accident rate down to a fourth what it was when OSHA was running it
all (and it was still rising).


Best of all, we have paid this fee (really a "hidden" tax) over and over,
because OTHER government agencies have conspired to delay or change the
design of this runway a dozen times, over the last 10 of 15 years.


Don't get me started! :~)

Sometime I'll fly out there and let my boss tell you about the 14.5 acre
mini-mall he was trying to build that cost over $2MILLION just to get past
the EPA crap, and bribes...ahemmm, campaign contributions, before the first
shovel full of dirt was turned. That was in friggin' South Dakota.


And each time the plan is changed, guess what? You need ANOTHER
"environmental impact statement"...


GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!


The company that contracts this service simply massages the old data,
reissues it in new book form, and cashes yet another check.

What a scam.


Bet they got some nice retired gub'mint types working for them.



  #2  
Old May 23rd 04, 06:21 PM
Wdtabor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


You should see the OSHA crap we run through. Our friggin' insurance company
got our accident rate down to a fourth what it was when OSHA was running it
all (and it was still rising).


There is nothing OSHA does that your business insurance underwriter cannot do
better and cheaper.

Likewise, there is nothing that the EPA does that could not be done better
through strict liability for damages to the property of others enforced through
the courts.

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG
  #3  
Old May 23rd 04, 08:52 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Jay Honeck wrote:

You can extend that statement to EVERYTHING nowadays.

You should see the cost of all the various EPA reports just for our airport
to extend a friggin' runway by a 1000 feet. It's incredible.


But you don't have competitors that don't have to deal with the EPA. American oil
companies do.

George Patterson
I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.
  #4  
Old May 23rd 04, 03:31 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

When it is profitable enough then more refining capacity will be built. On
the production side, the market is telling you that it is not very
attractive to drill at recent prices.

Mike
MU-2

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
et...
Wasn't there an article in the WSJ a week or two ago where some oil

company
execs said the regs weren't the primary issue?

I didn't look into it further. What's the problem? Failure of the
marketplace to place sufficient refining capacity on line? The price of
bringing more well capacity online is too high or unpalatable to the

public?
What? Or is it working the way it's supposed to and there are just a

bunch
of people annoyed at higher prices?

Are you an expert in the field (no pun intended) or just going with a gut
feeling? Just curious, because while I would gladly discuss with someone
with significant industry knowledge I really don't have any time to debate
environmental politics or with someone who bases their knowledge on one
party's propaganda (either one). No offense but it's late.


"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
et...
This doesn't sound right. Are you saying the "EPA and others,"

meaning
government regulation, reduced the oil well reserves?


Reserves (from the time) and known resources are much higher than what

we're
extracting.





  #5  
Old May 23rd 04, 01:55 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

When it is profitable enough then more refining capacity will be built.
On
the production side, the market is telling you that it is not very
attractive to drill at recent prices.


I was under the impression that restrictive EPA regulations had essentially
halted new refinery construction?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #6  
Old May 23rd 04, 02:30 PM
Bob Fry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jay Honeck" writes:

When it is profitable enough then more refining capacity will be built.

On
the production side, the market is telling you that it is not very
attractive to drill at recent prices.


I was under the impression that restrictive EPA regulations had essentially
halted new refinery construction?


Caveat: I know as much about the refinery business as Jay ;-)

EPA regulations don't "halt new refinery construction." Their
safeguards no doubt make it more expensive. My guess is the same as
an earlier poster: until the price of gasoline rises enough to pay for
the extra costs, new refineries won't be built. It's pretty simple.
Awww, now we can't fly our toys for cheap.

Don't like it? Write your representatives and vote. Or move to any
3rd world country where the same multi-national corporations regularly
destroy the surrounding environment and have periodic disasters with
their equipment, killing people and causing further damage. It's not
that they're particularly evil or even greedy, they're just doing
business according to the local rules. Ours are tougher.
  #7  
Old May 23rd 04, 02:58 PM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob Fry wrote:

Awww, now we can't fly our toys for cheap.


So now gas is 27% of the cost of ownership instead of 25%?


All the best,


David
  #8  
Old May 23rd 04, 05:17 PM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Fry" wrote in message
...
"Jay Honeck" writes:

When it is profitable enough then more refining capacity will be

built.
On
the production side, the market is telling you that it is not very
attractive to drill at recent prices.


I was under the impression that restrictive EPA regulations had

essentially
halted new refinery construction?


Caveat: I know as much about the refinery business as Jay ;-)

EPA regulations don't "halt new refinery construction." Their
safeguards no doubt make it more expensive.


The cost of the initial PAPERWORK runs into $$$BBBBILLIONS, much less the
actual construction.


  #9  
Old May 23rd 04, 10:12 PM
Bob Fry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tom Sixkiller" writes:

The cost of the initial PAPERWORK runs into $$$BBBBILLIONS, much less the
actual construction.


Wow! Imagine all the paper! Why, I'll bet it reaches from here to my
front door!

Imagine, Tom, if you could post something other than myths from talk
radio...
  #10  
Old May 24th 04, 11:02 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


new refineries won't be built.


We can and do import gasoline already refined. That way we export the
mess elsewhere.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Floridians Are Hit With Price Gouging X98 Military Aviation 0 August 18th 04 04:07 PM
Garmin Price Fixing Post from other newsgroup TripodBill Home Built 17 August 4th 04 10:42 AM
Garmin Price Fixing Post from other newsgroup TripodBill Instrument Flight Rules 8 July 16th 04 04:50 PM
Headsets: "Minimum Advertised Price" Will Thompson Piloting 21 April 10th 04 11:22 AM
Cessna 150 Price Outlook Charles Talleyrand Owning 80 October 16th 03 02:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.