A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The price of gas



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 23rd 04, 02:01 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I agree that refining capacity has been impacted by various enviornmental
regs. These haven't affected drilling (and hence production) much though.

Mike
MU-2
"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
et...
This doesn't sound right. Are you saying the "EPA and others," meaning
government regulation, reduced the oil well reserves?


Reserves (from the time) and known resources are much higher than what

we're
extracting.



"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
news

Production peaked due to interference by EPA and others, not due to
availability or resources. IOW he was right for the wrong reasons.









  #2  
Old May 23rd 04, 05:10 PM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
nk.net...
I agree that refining capacity has been impacted by various enviornmental
regs. These haven't affected drilling (and hence production) much

though.


Environmental regs haven't affected drilling? Are you kidding?


  #3  
Old May 24th 04, 07:05 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
nk.net...
I agree that refining capacity has been impacted by various

enviornmental
regs. These haven't affected drilling (and hence production) much

though.


Environmental regs haven't affected drilling? Are you kidding?



Let's see...where have I been. I was an energy analyst for about a decade
and since then I have made a reasonable living investing in energy
companies. Where have you been? Listening to AM radio?

Mike
MU-2


  #4  
Old May 25th 04, 07:58 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
nk.net...
I agree that refining capacity has been impacted by various

enviornmental
regs. These haven't affected drilling (and hence production) much

though.


Environmental regs haven't affected drilling? Are you kidding?



Let's see...where have I been. I was an energy analyst for about a decade
and since then I have made a reasonable living investing in energy
companies. Where have you been? Listening to AM radio?


I don't get a good AM signal here.

Do your energy companies have to abide by more and more, or less and less
environmental regulation? Is it easier or harder to drill now than it was
back 30 or so years ago?

Ask your energy companies how mush they do new drilling now than they did in
years past.

Are you always so goddamn pompous?


  #5  
Old May 25th 04, 04:41 PM
Peter Gottlieb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

Do your energy companies have to abide by more and more, or less and less
environmental regulation? Is it easier or harder to drill now than it was
back 30 or so years ago?


These don't seem like useful comparisons. Many environmental regulations
came about because of eggregious pollution cases so some of the regulation
is due to their own irresponsibility in the past. I do not believe the
present corporate quarterly-results-driven culture would do much better.
Also, the push to enact legislation limiting their liability makes it look
like they want the profits without the responsibility.

There is virtually no industry which is not more regulated than it was in
the past. This is a fact of life in virtually every country. You can spend
your life complaining about and fighting it or you can adapt and deal with
it. It is left as an exercise to the reader as to which one will work out
better for you.




  #6  
Old May 25th 04, 04:51 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
nk.net...
I agree that refining capacity has been impacted by various

enviornmental
regs. These haven't affected drilling (and hence production) much
though.


Environmental regs haven't affected drilling? Are you kidding?



Let's see...where have I been. I was an energy analyst for about a

decade
and since then I have made a reasonable living investing in energy
companies. Where have you been? Listening to AM radio?


I don't get a good AM signal here.

Do your energy companies have to abide by more and more, or less and less
environmental regulation? Is it easier or harder to drill now than it was
back 30 or so years ago?


That isn't the point. The point is whether or not enviornmental
restrictions have had a meaningful effect on depressing drilling activity.
Obviously they have had some effect. The main depressent on drilling has
been the need to go deeper and deeper to find less and less.

Ask your energy companies how mush they do new drilling now than they did

in
years past.


See above. Budgets are up across the industry due to better pricing but
drilling will never reach the levels of 40 yrs ago simply due to the fact
that the resource has been largely exploited in the US.

Are you always so goddamn pompous?


Only when I am dealing with a jackass who considers himself an expert of
everything.without knowing anything about the subjects he pontificates on.
Face the facts, you have absolutely no idea what the cost or effect of
eviornmental regulations is on O&G drilling. Industrywide they are a
rounding error.


Mike
MU-2


  #7  
Old May 24th 04, 05:53 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
nk.net...

The source you asked for:

http://smartmoney.com/aheadofthecurv...story=20040521

BTW, he's doing a correction that the "Quadrillion" BTU's should have been
"Billion".



  #8  
Old May 24th 04, 07:03 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Luskin is just talking his book. A lot of what's in the article is
distorted half truths like the reserve information.

Mike
MU-2

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
nk.net...

The source you asked for:

http://smartmoney.com/aheadofthecurv...story=20040521

BTW, he's doing a correction that the "Quadrillion" BTU's should have been
"Billion".





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Floridians Are Hit With Price Gouging X98 Military Aviation 0 August 18th 04 04:07 PM
Garmin Price Fixing Post from other newsgroup TripodBill Home Built 17 August 4th 04 10:42 AM
Garmin Price Fixing Post from other newsgroup TripodBill Instrument Flight Rules 8 July 16th 04 04:50 PM
Headsets: "Minimum Advertised Price" Will Thompson Piloting 21 April 10th 04 11:22 AM
Cessna 150 Price Outlook Charles Talleyrand Owning 80 October 16th 03 02:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.