New Sectional and....

In article , Peter Duniho wrote:
Do you still maintain that TFRs being published implies that there is no
plan to eliminate them?

Personally, I don't know - but I think they should quit pussyfooting
around and either get rid of the TFRs or change them to
restricted/prohibited areas.

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"

In article ,
says...

In article , Peter Duniho wrote:
Do you still maintain that TFRs being published implies that there is no
plan to eliminate them?

Personally, I don't know - but I think they should quit pussyfooting
around and either get rid of the TFRs or change them to
restricted/prohibited areas.


I disagree. as long as they remain temporary, they can easily (and quietly) be
removed. Some wounds take time to heal. 911 was a big wound to the country,
and authorities have to show they are doing something - even if it's
sometimes more show than substance. If the TFR's can be removed in time, so
much the better. I don't really know what "freedom" we will have gained by
being able to fly over a nuclear power station, but the Presidential TFR
guessing game is tiresome, and the TFR's in general present a regulatory trap
for pilots - so it would be better if they could be lifted in time. So what if
it takes another three years - better than never, don't you agree?

G Faris

I don't really know what "freedom" we will have gained by
being able to fly over a nuclear power station


The freedom to fly without having to find out where the danged things are. The
freedom to take pictures of them (and of things near them) without being shot
down. The freedom do to many things that most people are not interested in
doing, which is what true freedom is all about.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)