![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm thankful I didn't have to fly one in combat. B-17's are beautiful airplanes but during WWII, they were big slow targets. Particularly for flak. Every B-17 vet I've ever talked to (dozens) said they'd have rather shoot it out with the Luftwaffe than ride through a flak storm on any given day. Over Germany, they generally got both, sometimes simultaneously. All those guys could count the number of people lost and calculate their chances for staying alive till their tour was over, they weren't good. Seven missions was the average, which is about a month. 25, then 30, then 35 were the requirement to rotate. They had the highest casualty percentages for the allies according to some sources, although I know one veteran who nearly completed two tours. (Had a nut shot off.) The B-24 is a magnifent airplane and worthy of a better place in history, but it's sad that the B-17 airframe couldn't stick around longer in greater civilian duties. I think they're one of the most majestic airplanes ever flown. For Christmas, though, I'd settle for a B-25 or even a P-38. BTW, they gave the bomber visit good press on the news last night. -c |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , gatt wrote:
but it's sad that the B-17 airframe couldn't stick around longer in greater civilian duties. I think they're one of the most majestic airplanes ever flown. Well, it was an old design even during the war. B-17's were commonly used in firebombing until the 1970's. Zillions of them were sold as surplus around the world. I, for one, thought it remarkable that people would fly in a plane where the official starting procedure required a crewman to stand next to each engine with a fire extinguisher. I think we should all marvel that there are so many of them still flying. How many other planes designed in the 1930's are still around? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "No Such User" wrote in message news:cavvec$7g6t7 Zillions of them were sold as surplus around the world. That is true. Here in Portland there was a guy who bought one to use as the roof of his gas station. He bought one as surplus for $5000, flew it into Portland and wrecked in on landing. The government felt bad for him, and gave him a second one at no cost. It's still there, except they took the nose off to restore it, so now there's a nose-less B-17 sitting over what used to be gas station pump islands. -c |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
763 Cruising Speed. | [email protected] | General Aviation | 24 | February 9th 04 09:30 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: AP Reveals Series Of Boeing 777 Fires!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 18 | October 16th 03 09:15 PM |