![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dale,
Always. I fly from a turf field....stationary runup is bad for the prop. How? If it were dirt, I might understand, but turf? Being on grass the speed doesn't become a big issue...no need to hold brakes during the checks. I disagree, strongly. Going with 2000 rpm, our Tobago would move like a rocket on our turf field. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote: How? If it were dirt, I might understand, but turf? There's dirt under that grass. Even water can erode a prop, imagine what dirt or small stones can do. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote: I disagree, strongly. Going with 2000 rpm, our Tobago would move like a rocket on our turf field. Have you tried it? Sure, you'll be moving faster than a "walking pace" taxi, but not so fast as to be a hazard. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dale" wrote in message ... Have you tried it? Yes. At 2000 rpm I would accelerating at quite a clip. After a couple hundred yards I'd be doing in excess of 30 mph. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Newps wrote: Yes. At 2000 rpm I would accelerating at quite a clip. After a couple hundred yards I'd be doing in excess of 30 mph. If I tried to do my runup with no brakes, I'd be airborne before I finished the mag check. George Patterson None of us is as dumb as all of us. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Newps" wrote: Yes. At 2000 rpm I would accelerating at quite a clip. After a couple hundred yards I'd be doing in excess of 30 mph. Good grief, how long does it take you to cycle a prop? G You're only at that power setting for a few seconds...but by all means do what you're comfortable with. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dale" wrote in message ... In article , "Newps" wrote: Yes. At 2000 rpm I would accelerating at quite a clip. After a couple hundred yards I'd be doing in excess of 30 mph. Good grief, how long does it take you to cycle a prop? G You're only at that power setting for a few seconds...but by all means do what you're comfortable with. Prop, mags and carb heat are done at 1700 rpm in virtually all Cessna's. The exact rpm isn't important. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Newps" wrote: Prop, mags and carb heat are done at 1700 rpm in virtually all Cessna's. The exact rpm isn't important. The Hartzell prop needs 2000 RPM. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dale,
Have you tried it? Sure, you'll be moving faster than a "walking pace" taxi, but not so fast as to be a hazard. Yes. And I disagree. Definitely hazardous. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
C-182 carb-heat causing rough running. | R.T. | Owning | 11 | November 26th 04 10:50 PM |
YAMAHA FZ 750 FZ750 RUNNING GENESIS ENGINE FOR SALE | Karsten | Home Built | 0 | September 3rd 04 07:34 PM |
Rotax 503 won't stop running | Tracy | Home Built | 2 | March 28th 04 04:56 PM |
Leaving all engines running at the gate | John | Piloting | 12 | February 5th 04 03:46 AM |