A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Running runup?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 30th 04, 08:00 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dale,

Always. I fly from a turf field....stationary runup is bad for the
prop.


How? If it were dirt, I might understand, but turf?

Being on
grass the speed doesn't become a big issue...no need to hold brakes
during the checks.


I disagree, strongly. Going with 2000 rpm, our Tobago would move like a
rocket on our turf field.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #2  
Old June 30th 04, 05:01 PM
Dale
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote:


How? If it were dirt, I might understand, but turf?


There's dirt under that grass. Even water can erode a prop, imagine
what dirt or small stones can do.

--
Dale L. Falk

There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing around with airplanes.

http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html
  #3  
Old June 30th 04, 05:02 PM
Dale
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote:



I disagree, strongly. Going with 2000 rpm, our Tobago would move like a
rocket on our turf field.


Have you tried it? Sure, you'll be moving faster than a "walking pace"
taxi, but not so fast as to be a hazard.

--
Dale L. Falk

There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing around with airplanes.

http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html
  #4  
Old July 1st 04, 03:01 AM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dale" wrote in message
...

Have you tried it?


Yes. At 2000 rpm I would accelerating at quite a clip. After a couple
hundred yards I'd be doing in excess of 30 mph.


  #5  
Old July 1st 04, 03:34 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Newps wrote:

Yes. At 2000 rpm I would accelerating at quite a clip. After a couple
hundred yards I'd be doing in excess of 30 mph.


If I tried to do my runup with no brakes, I'd be airborne before I finished the mag
check.

George Patterson
None of us is as dumb as all of us.
  #6  
Old July 1st 04, 04:50 PM
Dale
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Newps" wrote:


Yes. At 2000 rpm I would accelerating at quite a clip. After a couple
hundred yards I'd be doing in excess of 30 mph.



Good grief, how long does it take you to cycle a prop? G You're only
at that power setting for a few seconds...but by all means do what
you're comfortable with.

--
Dale L. Falk

There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing around with airplanes.

http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html
  #7  
Old July 1st 04, 10:08 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dale" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Newps" wrote:


Yes. At 2000 rpm I would accelerating at quite a clip. After a couple
hundred yards I'd be doing in excess of 30 mph.



Good grief, how long does it take you to cycle a prop? G You're only
at that power setting for a few seconds...but by all means do what
you're comfortable with.


Prop, mags and carb heat are done at 1700 rpm in virtually all Cessna's.
The exact rpm isn't important.


  #8  
Old July 2nd 04, 05:54 AM
Dale
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Newps" wrote:



Prop, mags and carb heat are done at 1700 rpm in virtually all Cessna's.
The exact rpm isn't important.



The Hartzell prop needs 2000 RPM.

--
Dale L. Falk

There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing around with airplanes.

http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html
  #9  
Old July 1st 04, 10:00 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dale,

Have you tried it? Sure, you'll be moving faster than a "walking pace"
taxi, but not so fast as to be a hazard.


Yes. And I disagree. Definitely hazardous.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
C-182 carb-heat causing rough running. R.T. Owning 11 November 26th 04 10:50 PM
YAMAHA FZ 750 FZ750 RUNNING GENESIS ENGINE FOR SALE Karsten Home Built 0 September 3rd 04 07:34 PM
Rotax 503 won't stop running Tracy Home Built 2 March 28th 04 04:56 PM
Leaving all engines running at the gate John Piloting 12 February 5th 04 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.