![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
... Those who know told me. Has anyone told of a situation where TKS has not worked in a known-ice TKS airplane? If so, then -- very seriously -- I would REALLY like to talk to that pilot. I have never -- repeat never -- heard any concerns whatsoever about TKS performance even among pilots who have clearly pushed TKS beyond the point that is legal and appropriate. I have heard stories about people departing in freezing rain with TKS with no problems at all. Again, I do *NOT* advocate known-ice TKS for anything beyond a climb above light to moderate icing conditions. However, it is helpful to know how a system performs at the boundaries. If you have any negative information whatseover about TKS performance in a known-ice airplane, please let me know; I have yet to hear of a single negative story except in the case of someone who ran out of fluid. Known-ice TKS is there to GET YOU OUT of icing conditions. Why in the world would you intentionally fly into an area where the only purpose of your safety equipment is to get you out? I would do this to depart and climb on top in the winter if I have a planned trip with reported light to moderate rime icing and tops within my airplane's capability. Saying one should fly into actual reporting icing conditions just because you have known-ice TKS installed is like saying I should intentionally spin a Cirrus because I have the safety equipment to recover from the spin installed. No, it's like saying I would spin a Citabria which is certified for spins. The Citabria is certified for spins, but I would use due caution at an appropriate altitude with appropriate training. My airplane is certified for flight into light or moderate known icing conditions; I regularly use that certification to climb through a layer to non-icing conditions. Indeed, rarely is icing more than 3,000 feet thick in winter stratus conditions and the TKS does a great job keeping the plane clean so usually my icing exposure is no more than maybe 10 minutes in the climb since my climb performance does not degrade in icing other than the need to conform to the stated minimum climb airspeed in icing conditions. Keep in mind that "known ice" for the purpose of icing certification means "freezing temperature and visible moisture", while the icing conditions I'm talking about here are those that are truly known to exist (that is, someone has just been there and reported that ice is present). Known icing for the purpose of icing certification means either forecast or observed. If it is wintertime and light to moderate icing is reported by piston airplanes climbing on top and no freezing rain is forecast, I depart all the time in my plane and it is perfectly legal to do so. If jets are reporting moderate icing or if anyone is reporting severe icing or if freezing rain is reported by anyone, then that is a different story. -------------------- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard:
Most of the detractors have simply had no personal experience with TKS, and do not know how well it works. At best, their "knowledge" is based on rumor or hearsay. On the other hand, given an opportunity to actually fly in an airplane with a system installed it immediately becomes apparent how useful it actually is. It has dramatically increased my ability to fly in the icing season (October through June), and has also has decreased my anxiety level when flight planning during the winter. It has any other combination of boots, hot props, alcohol props, hot windshields, etc beat hands down. On our small airport we have a P210, turbine Bonanza, V35 Bonanza, and my Baron all equipped with TKS and we all remain enthusiastic about how great it works. Unless someone has actually flown a TKS equipped plane in icing conditions they simply are not capable of making a rational comparison. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Viperdoc" wrote in message ... Unless someone has actually flown a TKS equipped plane in icing conditions they simply are not capable of making a rational comparison. I agree completely... TKS is one of the most under-appreciated mods to an airplane. In part I think this is because people want to rationalize flying their airplanes in the winter and it is tough to acknowledge, for example, that a 1980s steam gauge Mooney with TKS is a much more capable IFR airplane than a brand new $350K Cirrus.. but it's the truth. -------------------- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin 430 wierd issues | Jon Kraus | Owning | 6 | November 12th 04 02:07 AM |
Back issues of Naval Aviation News | Steve Tobey | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 23rd 04 09:50 PM |
Article: GPS Vehicle Tracking System Issues for the Buyer | Johann Blake | Military Aviation | 0 | January 16th 04 11:26 AM |
How much could I get for these back issues? | Aaron Smith | Home Built | 8 | December 15th 03 12:07 PM |
ISO back issues Combat Aircraft magazine | mark e digby | Military Aviation | 0 | August 12th 03 05:39 PM |