|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
July 4th 04, 10:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Ah, that is strange. They must have found some room inside the wing to make
the bladders a little bigger. 88 useable, is that about 92 total? That would be 6 gallons more per side, not just "a little" bit bigger! Lucky you! I used to fly an Arrow that had 92 gallon tanks. Not many people could spend that much time without needing to use the bathroom! Good flights! Jim --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 6/27/2004 
|
|
#2
July 4th 04, 08:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Burns wrote:
Ah, that is strange. They must have found some room inside the wing to make the bladders a little bigger. Shrug Dunno. As I said, I'm astonished at what can change in a year. I used to fly an Arrow that had 92 gallon tanks. Not many people could spend that much time without needing to use the bathroom! Which is why leaving fuel behind for more load is usually no great cost. The real issue (at least for me) is trusting what's in the tanks. - Andrew
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Desktop Wallpaper - "United States Navy Summer Pulse ’04 | T. & D. Gregor, Sr. | Naval Aviation | 3 | October 9th 04 07:44 PM |
| What I did on my summer vacation | Jim Burns | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | July 9th 04 02:52 AM |
Hybrid Mode
