A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ATC: Knots vs. Mach?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 8th 04, 03:29 AM
AES/newspost
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ATC: Knots vs. Mach?

Listening to audio channel 9 on United, at higher altitudes and during
cruise I hear ATC say things like "What's your mach?" and "Maintain
mach 77" and at lower altitudes and during approaches "slow to 180" or
"maintain 250 for spacing".

I appreciate that these are occurring in quite different ranges of
operation and the units involved are very different in scale, but I'm
still curious about the potential confusion, or at least possibility for
same, in using two different sets of units for the same quantity
(especially when you recall incidents where confusion over units has led
to loss of satellites, or airliners running out of gas).

Do different levels of ATC consistently use only one of these units and
not the other? Do cockpit instruments read in both units, or are there
two separate "speedometers" (or a switch that has to be thrown to read
in one or the other)? What's the smallest _civilian_ aircraft that will
have a mach meter? Do prop or turboprop airliners have a mach indicator?
  #2  
Old July 8th 04, 04:28 AM
Really Me
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



AES/newspost wrote:

Listening to audio channel 9 on United, at higher altitudes and during
cruise I hear ATC say things like "What's your mach?" and "Maintain
mach 77" and at lower altitudes and during approaches "slow to 180" or
"maintain 250 for spacing".

I appreciate that these are occurring in quite different ranges of
operation and the units involved are very different in scale, but I'm
still curious about the potential confusion, or at least possibility for
same, in using two different sets of units for the same quantity


I don't think a UA pilot is going to confuse 250 knots with 2.5 Mach or
180 Mach any more then he will confuse mach 77 (.77) with 77 knots.

  #3  
Old July 8th 04, 06:05 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

IIRC.. from controlling traffic more than 25 years go..

Speed control for spacing, must use Mach numbers above FL290.. not Indicated
airspeed in knots.

Below FL290, or was it FL250, use of IAS in knots is standard..

Ref: 7110.65 (which I do not have handy right now)

BT

"AES/newspost" wrote in message
...
Listening to audio channel 9 on United, at higher altitudes and during
cruise I hear ATC say things like "What's your mach?" and "Maintain
mach 77" and at lower altitudes and during approaches "slow to 180" or
"maintain 250 for spacing".

I appreciate that these are occurring in quite different ranges of
operation and the units involved are very different in scale, but I'm
still curious about the potential confusion, or at least possibility for
same, in using two different sets of units for the same quantity
(especially when you recall incidents where confusion over units has led
to loss of satellites, or airliners running out of gas).

Do different levels of ATC consistently use only one of these units and
not the other? Do cockpit instruments read in both units, or are there
two separate "speedometers" (or a switch that has to be thrown to read
in one or the other)? What's the smallest _civilian_ aircraft that will
have a mach meter? Do prop or turboprop airliners have a mach indicator?



  #4  
Old July 8th 04, 06:16 AM
Really Me
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



BTIZ wrote:
IIRC.. from controlling traffic more than 25 years go..

Speed control for spacing, must use Mach numbers above FL290.. not Indicated
airspeed in knots.

Below FL290, or was it FL250, use of IAS in knots is standard..

Ref: 7110.65 (which I do not have handy right now)


At or above FL240, express speed (IAS) in Mach
Below FL 240, express speed in knots

The document I read indicates the unit should still be given, like
"Maintain two eight zero knots" or "Increase speed to Mach point 72"
http://www.faa.gov/atpubs/ATC/Chp5/atc0507.html#5-7-2

  #5  
Old July 8th 04, 09:22 AM
Mark Hewitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Really Me" wrote in message
m...



At or above FL240, express speed (IAS) in Mach
Below FL 240, express speed in knots


Any reason?


  #6  
Old July 8th 04, 02:27 PM
Icebound
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mark Hewitt" wrote in message
...

"Really Me" wrote in message
m...



At or above FL240, express speed (IAS) in Mach
Below FL 240, express speed in knots


Any reason?



high altitude, low air pressu-- knots indication is inaccurate


  #7  
Old July 8th 04, 04:53 PM
Charles Newman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Icebound" wrote in message
able.rogers.com...

"Mark Hewitt" wrote in

message
...

"Really Me" wrote in message
m...



At or above FL240, express speed (IAS) in Mach
Below FL 240, express speed in knots


Any reason?



high altitude, low air pressu-- knots indication is inaccurate


I find, in Flight Simulator, that accuracy starts dropping off at
14,000 feet. MSL.





  #8  
Old July 9th 04, 01:13 AM
Darrell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Some flight guidance and control systems automatically switch from IAS to
Mach at a given Flight Level. Example would be the MD-80 DFGC. If the
IAS/Mach switch is pushed below FL 270 it shows and controls current IAS.
If the same switch is pushed above FL 270 is shows and controls current
Mach.

--

B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/
-

"Mark Hewitt" wrote in message
...

"Really Me" wrote in message
m...



At or above FL240, express speed (IAS) in Mach
Below FL 240, express speed in knots


Any reason?




  #9  
Old July 8th 04, 04:52 PM
Charles Newman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


In Flight Simulator, I use knots below 14,000 and Mach above 14,000.
Below 14,000
true airspeed and indicated speed are pretty close, but above 14000, they
start to drift
apart quite rapidly.


"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:yC4Hc.15044$z81.6157@fed1read01...
IIRC.. from controlling traffic more than 25 years go..

Speed control for spacing, must use Mach numbers above FL290.. not

Indicated
airspeed in knots.

Below FL290, or was it FL250, use of IAS in knots is standard..

Ref: 7110.65 (which I do not have handy right now)

BT

"AES/newspost" wrote in message
...
Listening to audio channel 9 on United, at higher altitudes and during
cruise I hear ATC say things like "What's your mach?" and "Maintain
mach 77" and at lower altitudes and during approaches "slow to 180" or
"maintain 250 for spacing".

I appreciate that these are occurring in quite different ranges of
operation and the units involved are very different in scale, but I'm
still curious about the potential confusion, or at least possibility for
same, in using two different sets of units for the same quantity
(especially when you recall incidents where confusion over units has led
to loss of satellites, or airliners running out of gas).

Do different levels of ATC consistently use only one of these units and
not the other? Do cockpit instruments read in both units, or are there
two separate "speedometers" (or a switch that has to be thrown to read
in one or the other)? What's the smallest _civilian_ aircraft that will
have a mach meter? Do prop or turboprop airliners have a mach

indicator?




  #10  
Old September 1st 04, 01:45 PM
Leopold Hamulczyk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, but remember that Filght Simulator is not a good benchmark. Flight Sim
is "dumb", it doesn't know anything. It uses lookup tables, not aerodynamic
modelling, for aircraft performance.

"Charles Newman" wrote in
message ...

In Flight Simulator, I use knots below 14,000 and Mach above 14,000.
Below 14,000
true airspeed and indicated speed are pretty close, but above 14000, they
start to drift
apart quite rapidly.


"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:yC4Hc.15044$z81.6157@fed1read01...
IIRC.. from controlling traffic more than 25 years go..

Speed control for spacing, must use Mach numbers above FL290.. not

Indicated
airspeed in knots.

Below FL290, or was it FL250, use of IAS in knots is standard..

Ref: 7110.65 (which I do not have handy right now)

BT

"AES/newspost" wrote in message
...
Listening to audio channel 9 on United, at higher altitudes and during
cruise I hear ATC say things like "What's your mach?" and "Maintain
mach 77" and at lower altitudes and during approaches "slow to 180" or
"maintain 250 for spacing".

I appreciate that these are occurring in quite different ranges of
operation and the units involved are very different in scale, but I'm
still curious about the potential confusion, or at least possibility

for
same, in using two different sets of units for the same quantity
(especially when you recall incidents where confusion over units has

led
to loss of satellites, or airliners running out of gas).

Do different levels of ATC consistently use only one of these units

and
not the other? Do cockpit instruments read in both units, or are

there
two separate "speedometers" (or a switch that has to be thrown to read
in one or the other)? What's the smallest _civilian_ aircraft that

will
have a mach meter? Do prop or turboprop airliners have a mach

indicator?






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blackbird v. Mig-25 Vello Kala Military Aviation 79 September 15th 04 04:05 AM
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) Guy Alcala Military Aviation 3 August 13th 04 12:18 PM
Settle a bet: Mach speeds tscottme Military Aviation 27 June 8th 04 10:16 AM
max altitude and Mach 1 Now With Charts John R Weiss Military Aviation 6 May 15th 04 05:49 PM
WWII warplanes vs combat sim realism [email protected] Military Aviation 37 November 27th 03 05:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.