Military Flight Training

It's all in the public record. He took the physical in 1973; it's
shown even on many of the anti-Bush sites.

References please.

Go to www.warbirdforum.com/bushf102.htm

For my own qualifications as a researcher, see Who's Who in America.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! weblog www.vivabush.org

Cub Driver wrote:


It's all in the public record. He took the physical in 1973; it's
shown even on many of the anti-Bush sites.

References please.

Go to www.warbirdforum.com/bushf102.htm

Insufficient. You claimed MANY sources. Please cite DOCUMENTATION sources
OTHER than your own web page.


For my own qualifications as a researcher, see Who's Who in America.

For your "Qualifications" to have any credibility, you should be able to
quote sources of information OTHER than your own web page. Your
credibility as a "Researcher" is dismal.

Even "All" the information Bush susposedly turned over to the media did NOT
include any physical in 1973. Perhaps you should mail him and the media
your sources - other than your web page.

MOST of us who went through flight training and could afford to fly would
not miss a physical and surrender the opportunity to fly high performance
aircraft - especially if the government were picking up the tab. I am not
current but that is because I can not afford to fly anymore. Bush never
had this problem.

By Bush failing to keep his flight status current he violated his duty and
there are regulations against that. That was pretty darn expensive
training the taxpayers had to pay. It also does not make sense that
someone who took at least some extra effort to get a commercial license out
of the flight training would just walk away from staying current - again
especially since Uncle Sam was paying the bill.

Also please comment on his alleged flying post discharge from the TAG. The
FAA records do not indicate he had an up to date physical at the time.

Dan, just TOO many coincidences - missing military records during THE
critical time interval in the controversy because they were supposedly
destroyed. Microfilm is not that easily destroyed.

Missing SEC files on his Harken stock trading because they supposedly were
"Lost". (His father appointed the SEC commissioners). Even his own
attorney advised against the trade.

Missing Texas drivers record that would have included his criminal record
because he had it expunged and a new license ordered.

Dan, I served TWO involuntary tours in Vietnam. It disgust me that Bush and
those like hime were able to skate and did not even serve ONE tour.
Perhaps if he had, at least one of us who served more than one term would
not have had to go.

It is also disgusting that Bush was able to get into flight training without
the prerequisites that others had to have. He did NOT have ROTC training
and yet was promoted to Lieutenant directly out of Basic training without
going to officer training. He did not have a science degree (He was a
History major) AND he scored one of the lowest possible scores on his exam
to get admitted to flight school. Even after all these breaks, he could
not be bothered to stay current and fulfill his obligation.

Since he will not be 60 when his term of President expires, and since he has
not resigned his commission. maybe he should be recalled back into active
dury in Afghanistan or Iraq. Also, perhaps he - AND all congress people
should have their children enlist and volunteer for duty in Afghanistan or
Iraq.

I do not wish to turn this newsgroup into a political diatribe. I asked a
question and I got my answer. You can email me directly to carry on this
discussion.

"Paul E. Lehmann" wrote in message
...
Cub Driver wrote:


It's all in the public record. He took the physical in 1973; it's
shown even on many of the anti-Bush sites.

References please.

Go to www.warbirdforum.com/bushf102.htm

Insufficient. You claimed MANY sources. Please cite DOCUMENTATION
sources
OTHER than your own web page.


For my own qualifications as a researcher, see Who's Who in America.

For your "Qualifications" to have any credibility, you should be able to
quote sources of information OTHER than your own web page. Your
credibility as a "Researcher" is dismal.

[snip a bunch of punk remarks]
....
I do not wish to turn this newsgroup into a political diatribe. I asked a
question and I got my answer. You can email me directly to carry on this
discussion.

Now we see why Dan is in the "Who's Who" and Paul isn't. (Clue: He's full
of it)

Tom Sixkiller wrote:

...........

Now we see why Dan is in the "Who's Who" and Paul isn't. (Clue: He's full
of it)

Facts, please. Please present the data that Bush took a flight physical in
1973. When an author quotes himself and no others, credibility is missing.