![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
om... Learn how to quickly get best power during the takeoff roll, using your mixture control for any higher altitude takeoffs[...] Some use a full power runup to adjust for max RPM before starting the roll but I always hesitated to do that to an engine just before takeoff. There's a good reason for doing it BEFORE starting your takeoff roll, and frankly, adding "fiddling with the mixture" to the things a pilot has to deal with DURING the takeoff roll seems unwise to me. Never mind the fact that once the airplane is moving, you will have a much harder time identifying the point at which the engine is developing maximum power, since RPM will be increasing as the airplane accelerates. I have no idea why you'd hesitate to do something proven to be safe, and which is much less hazardous than your personal procedure, but I hope that no one else applies your advice to their flights. [...] Having an EGT gage really helps. I think it should be mandatory on any carburated engine but that is just the engineer in me showing I guess.... The EGT gauge is not necessary, nor useful, for the purpose of obtaining maximum power for takeoff. Your RPM gauge will give you a 100% reliable indication of maximum power, since maximum power will result in maximum RPM every time. Using the EGT gauge adds an additional layer of indirection, and you may or may not wind up with the actual maximum power mixture setting using it. Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To each his own I guess.
I have gotten used to glancing at the EGT on my takeoff rolls just to make sure things are feeding fuel and air, and also running right. I look for something about 50 to 100 deg F on the rich side of peak. EGT also tells me if I have loaded up the things with carb ice while waiting for takeoff. It is the only cross-check that I have to figure out if the air/fuel metering system is behaving right, and that the engine is properly extracting energy from the combustion process. Personally I feel that any new engine installation (such as in a homebuilt) should have at least a temporary EGT until the idiosyncracies (sp?) of the air intake system are proven out. I've seen/heard of several aircraft that have been excessively lean (especially in the winter) or rich to the point of stumbling when carb heat is added. The technique of getting a badly iced engine back requires aggressive leaning, but I don't see that taught anywhere. How do you lean a constant speed prop aircraft without EGT? I agree that leaning a fixed pitch prop on the run without an EGT is not good practice unless you know the engine. Maybe I am more into this because I am using autofuel. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
om... I have gotten used to glancing at the EGT on my takeoff rolls just to make sure things are feeding fuel and air, and also running right. Monitoring engine gauges is fine. Trying to adjust mixture while rolling on takeoff is not. I look for something about 50 to 100 deg F on the rich side of peak. Like I said, the EGT (at any time) does not give you nearly as accurate an indication of maximum power as RPM does during a static runup. Given that you're happy with a range of 50 degrees, that's doubly true. EGT also tells me if I have loaded up the things with carb ice while waiting for takeoff. It is the only cross-check that I have to figure out if the air/fuel metering system is behaving right, and that the engine is properly extracting energy from the combustion process. Firstly, you can easily do that cross-check during a static full-power run-up just before takeoff. Secondly, huh? You could easily have carb ice and still get a normal EGT reading, albeit at a different mixture setting than normal. [...] How do you lean a constant speed prop aircraft without EGT? Funny you should ask. First of all, this thread is about a 150, and you did mention your TriPacer as well. Both fixed-pitched props. Secondly, during a static run-up, even a constant speed prop is usually going to be able to show you maximum power. Keep the prop control to maximum RPM and for most installations, there won't be enough engine power to bring the prop to the actual maximum RPM. This is true even at sea level, but especially true if you're at high density altitude (the situation we're talking about here), even for higher-powered engines. I agree that leaning a fixed pitch prop on the run without an EGT is not good practice unless you know the engine. I don't think that adjusting the mixture during the takeoff roll is a good practice under any circumstance. The takeoff roll is a time during which you should be trying to minimize workload, not introducing new, optional items to add to your workload. On top of everything else, it's my personal practice to keep my hand on the throttle throughout the takeoff. This is a common technique used by many pilots and helps ensure that the throttle doesn't accidently vibrate off the full-power setting, and of course in a twin, makes sure your hands are in the right place in case of an engine failure below Vmc (in airplanes where that's an issue). It would be hard to keep one's hand on the throttle at the same time you're fiddling with the mixture. Maybe I am more into this because I am using autofuel. I don't see what the type of fuel has to do with it. Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Around here (Western Canada) most of the neophytes who get into
trouble in the mountains crash because of weather considerations or by entering an upsloping valley that the airplane can't outclimb and the pilot waits too long before turning around. Mountain weather is treacherous and can change very rapidly. Pay attention to the weather briefers. Mountain clouds usually have rocks in them. Mountain valleys can be confusing, especially if there's no highway to follow, and it's easy to turn into a wrong canyon and get lost real quick. The route should be marked on the map, with compass headings penciled in on each leg. For anemic airplanes like the 150, wind direction over the hills can make the difference between climbing and sinking, as can lift or sink generated by solar heating or shade on the slopes. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
4800nm trip complete! | SeeAndAvoid | Piloting | 2 | June 19th 04 05:58 PM |
Coast to coast trip finished :-) | Filip Zawadiak | Piloting | 6 | May 5th 04 08:45 PM |
Planning a trip | S Green | Piloting | 30 | January 14th 04 12:17 AM |
Crossing the Rockies in a 172 | Peter von Tresckow | Piloting | 14 | December 20th 03 05:27 AM |
First long-distance trip | Marc | Piloting | 2 | December 16th 03 04:03 AM |